building a clean water legacy
play

Building a Clean Water Legacy Rebecca Flood MPCA Assistant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Building a Clean Water Legacy Rebecca Flood MPCA Assistant Commissioner Water Policy June 10, 2010 Minnesota Association of County Planning and Zoning Administrators Presentation Overview Agency Mission Clean Water Focus Watershed


  1. Building a Clean Water Legacy Rebecca Flood MPCA Assistant Commissioner Water Policy June 10, 2010 Minnesota Association of County Planning and Zoning Administrators

  2. Presentation Overview  Agency Mission  Clean Water Focus  Watershed Approach  SSTS Legislation & Next Steps  Preparing for the Future 2

  3. MPCA Mission  Working with Minnesotans to protect, conserve and improve our environment and enhance our quality of life. 3

  4. Clean Water Focus Assess the condition of Minnesota’s ground  water systems, prevent and reduce degradation of ground water, and support ground water conservation. Protect and improve the chemical, physical and  biological integrity of Minnesota’s lakes, streams and wetlands. Interagency partnership to implement Clean  Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funding. 4

  5. Clean Water: Background The TMDL Process  Clean Water Legacy Act Assess the state’ s waters List those that do not meet  Provides authority standards and direction Identify sources and reductions  Clean Water Council needed (TMDL Study) created Implement restoration activities  Constitutional (Implementation Plan) Amendment Funding Evaluate water quality 5

  6. Clean Water Fund Total for All Agencies: $150.8 million for FY 2010-11 Monitoring/ Assessment 9% 14% $21.5M TMDL Development 14% $20.4M Protection/ Restoration $95.3M 63% Drinking Water Protect $13.6M 6

  7. Clean Water Amendment MPCA: $51.16 million total in FY2010-11 Monitoring/ Assessment 17% $16.74M 33% TMDL Development $18.5M 14% Protection/ Restoration $8.67M 36% Drinking Water Protect $7.25M 7

  8. Watershed Approach: Ten-Year Rotation Monitoring and Assessment Condition monitoring Effectiveness monitoring Every 10 Years Watershed Restoration Implementation and Protection Strategy Activities TMDL BMPs Protection Strategy Permits Implementation Plans 8

  9. Remote Sensing Local / Citizen Monitoring Condition Monitoring Lake Monitoring by Watershed V # # V V # Agency Monitoring V # River/Stream V # # V # V # V # V V # V # Monitoring V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # by Watershed V # V # V # # V V # V # # V # V V # V # # V # V Load Monitoring V # V # V # # V V # V # V # V # Network V # V # Assessment # V # V # V V # V # V # # V # V V # # V V # V # # V V # V # V # V # Unimpaired Impaired V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # V # # V V # V # V # # V # V Protection TMDL Study (Nondegradation) (Remediation) Effectiveness Monitoring Implementation

  10. Watershed Approach: Ten-Year Monitoring Schedule Leg egen end 2006 2006 *The 10 year schedule runs from 2008 to 2017. In 2018, the Snake, North Fork Crow and Pomme de Terre watersheds will be revisited; the first intensive watershed surveys on these watersheds were completed in 2006 and 2007.

  11. Watershed Approach: Restoration and Protection Where we have been Where we are now 11

  12. SSTS: Update on Recent Legislation  Rule revisions and County ordinances  Enforcement task force  Enforcement protocols and checklists  Progress report 12

  13. SSTS: Rule Revisions/County Ordinances  Rule revisions: April 4, 2011  Public Comment Period: June 21-July 21, 2010  Limited to proposed areas of change  County ordinances: February 4, 2012 13

  14. SSTS: Enforcement Task Force  Reduce SSTS-related public health threats  Enforce SSTS rules  Membership  Association of MN Counties  MN Association of County Planning and Zoning Administrators  MN Onsite Wastewater Association  MN Association of Realtors 14

  15. SSTS: Enforcement Protocols/Checklists  Update and assemble information for use during inspections and to support potential enforcement actions  Potential collaborators  MPCA  Attorney General’s Office  County Attorneys  SSTS Task Force 15

  16. SSTS: Progress Report  Minnesota Legislature: January 2011  Rule-making  Local ordinance adoption  Protection of state’s water resources from SSTS pollution 16

  17. Preparing for the Future Sustainable Agency Deliver and manage operations and services efficiently.  Focus on what the MPCA is uniquely positioned to do—and  do that work well. Align prevention and assistance activities with other  agency efforts to protect environment and human health. Be prepared to respond to emerging issues  Partner with government, businesses, and citizens to  support healthy ecosystems MPCA leads the way to minimize its environmental  footprint and assist other public entities to do the same. 17

  18. Preparing for the Future  Commissioner’s Office Changes  Integrated Solid Waste Management  Redistribution of staff to Watershed Units  Strategic Project Sector  Budget Reduction Exercise 18

  19. Preparing for the Future  The upcoming fiscal year will be “the most difficult to date” according to a survey by the National Governor’s Association.  Two-thirds of consumer spending is now related to services, which is not captured by…state tax structures. Council of State Governments, April 2010 19

  20. Preparing for the Future  FY 2010-2011  6% cut in General and Special Revenue Funds (≈ $2.3million)  Stormwater compliance grants ELIMINATED  Feedlot grants REDUCED  Clean Water Partnership grants REDUCED  Anticipated FY2012-2013  6% cut in General and Special Revenue Funds (≈ $2.3million)  Other changes likely on the horizon 20

  21. Rebecca Flood Assistant Commissioner Water Policy 651-757-2022 21

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend