Briefing on Flexible Ramping Capacity Product Mark Rothleder - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

briefing on flexible ramping capacity product
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Briefing on Flexible Ramping Capacity Product Mark Rothleder - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Briefing on Flexible Ramping Capacity Product Mark Rothleder Executive Director, Market Analysis & Development Board of Governors Meeting General Session July 12-13, 2012 Background on flexible ramping product: August 2011 Board


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Briefing on Flexible Ramping Capacity Product

Mark Rothleder Executive Director, Market Analysis & Development Board of Governors Meeting General Session July 12-13, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background on flexible ramping product:

  • August 2011

– Board approves flexible ramping constraint – Management directed to expedite a bid-based flexible ramping product

  • November 2011

– ISO starts flexible ramping product stakeholder process

  • December 2011

– ISO implements flexible ramping constraint – FERC set compensation and allocation issues to settlement

  • February 2012

– Board briefed on status of product design initiative and development of cost allocation principles

  • May 2012

– Board briefed on cost allocation principles – ISO planned to bring flexible product decision to July Board meeting

Page 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Flexible ramping is needed to balance for the range of expected net load conditions.

Page 3

Forecasted Upper limit Lower limit Actual now t Now Time Net load

Real upward ramp need Real downward ramp need

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Flexible ramping product enables the ISO to reliably and efficiently manage the fleet.

  • Improve real-time dispatch flexibility

– Manage net load variations on a 5-minute basis – Reduces ramping shortages – Reduce real-time operation risk

  • Recognize a resource’s ramping value through a

bid-based market product

– Incentivize resources to make ramping capability available – Compensate for increased maintenance costs

Page 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Three major issues are being addressed in the stakeholder process.

  • 1. How much capacity should be procured ahead of

real-time?

  • 2. How to resolve interplay between market processes?
  • 3. How to allocate costs?

Page 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How much capacity should be procured?

  • Option 1 – Fixed quantity
  • Option 2 – Demand curve

Page 6

MW

Cost ($)

Supply Fixed Demand MW

Cost ($)

Supply Demand Curve How much should be procured:

  • day-ahead,
  • real-time unit commitment,
  • real-time dispatch?
slide-7
SLIDE 7

How to resolve interplay between market processes?

  • Consider expected real-time energy dispatch cost in the

day-ahead procurement decision.

  • If energy dispatch cost is considered do not allow

suppliers to change energy bid in real-time.

  • Resolve interplay between integrated forward market

flexible ramp procurement and residual unit commitment.

  • Should suppliers be allowed to buy back in real-time?

Page 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Allocate flexible ramping product costs to resource deviations driving the need for the product.

Page 8

Flexible Ramping Up Flexible Ramping Down Negative Movement* Positive Movement*

Load Supply Intertie Ramp Load Supply Intertie Ramp

* Movement is the 10 minute change

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Align cost allocation with principles

Guiding Principle Cost Allocation Design Element Causation

  • Costs allocated to entities based upon system need for

real-time dispatch. Comparable Treatment

  • Similar resources are treated the same.

Efficient Policy Achievement

  • Allow netting across resources within a cost category.
  • Using actual data to analyze the proposed allocation.

Incentivize Behavior

  • Incentive for resources to improve dispatch performance

and provide service. Manageable

  • Use real-time forecast updated every 15 minutes to

measure variable energy resource’s uninstructed energy.

  • Functionality to allow a resource’s allocation to be

transferred between scheduling coordinators.

  • Transition period

Synchronized

  • Monthly re-settlement of hourly costs

Rational

  • Maximize the use of existing settlement functionality

Page 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Schedule to finalize flexible ramping product design and cost allocation rules:

Page 10

  • Stakeholder process: July – October 2012
  • Workshops to provide opportunity for technical understanding
  • Provide sufficient time to consider FERC’s recent variable

energy resource rulemaking

  • Provide sufficient time for proposal consideration and comment
  • Board decision: November 2012
  • Target implementation: Fall 2013