Brief Report of the 3rd International Forum for Sustainable Asia and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Brief Report of the 3rd International Forum for Sustainable Asia and the Pacific (ISAP2011): The Asia-Pacific Multi-stakeholder Dialogue

• n Rio+20

Takashi Otsuka Programme Management Office IGES

Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC 1-2 September 2011, Seoul, Republic of Korea

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 2

About IGES

 International Research Institute which

conducts practical and innovative research for realizing sustainable development in the Asia and the Pacific.

 IGES was established in 1998.  About 100 researchers, full-time and part-

tie, from diversity of countries other than Japan (about 1/3 of staff : non- Japanese).

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 3

International Forum for Sustainable Asia and the Pacific (ISAP2011)~ New Asia-Pacific Perspectives towards Rio+20: Implications of

the East Japan Disasters~  The 3rd ISAP: 26-27 July 2011, Yokohama, Japan.  Co-organized by IGES and UNU-IAS.  Collaborators: UNESCAP, UNEP-ROAP, and ADB.  Participants: about 850 people.  ISAP2011 is designated as the Asia-Pacific Multi-stakeholder Dialogue on Rio+20  Themes:

(1) Implications of the recent triple disasters in Eastern Japan. (2) Green Economy in the Context of Poverty Eradication (GECPE) (3) Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development (IFSD)

 The summary of the discussion will be presented to the Asia Pacific Regional Preparatory Meeting for UNCSD, to be held in Seoul, ROK, from 19 to 20 October 2011.

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 4

Outline

(1) Introduction (2) Resilient and Sustainable Society (3) Green Economy in the Context of Poverty

Eradication (GECPE)

(4) Institutional Framework for Sustainable

Development (IFSD)

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 5

General views on Rio+20



Sustainable development could be only achieved by addressing the three dimensions of sustainable development, namely economy, society, and environment, which are interdependent and should be addressed in an integrated manner.



Gaps in interests and priorities of each country has been one of the obstacles for enhancing international cooperation.



The international community can learn from the recent Great East Japan Earthquake and associated nuclear accident . Economic development Japan has been strongly pursued while underestimating social and environmental risks thereby undermining the resilience of society to manmade and natural hazards - with tremendous economic, social, and environmental costs.  One of the key concepts underpinning integration is ‘resilience’, which should be revisited by all countries to contribute to sustainable development. The emergence of an interlinked and resilient global governance and economic system based on the principles of sustainable development. The green economy is an important interim milestone in this system. At the same time, a better Institutional Framework for Sustainable Development (IFSD) is one of the necessary conditions.

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 6

• The 3.11 earthquake, tsunami and subsequent accidents at the Fukushima nuclear power plant

gave us a brutal reminder of challenges linked to energy supply and to where energy should come from.

• There is a need to reduce energy demand and substitute nuclear energy with renewable energy.

Although an intensive renewable energy pathway is not yet decided, early adoption of renewable energy substitutes (including geothermal) would offset initial price increase in the long run.

• Fukushima is a lesson on strengthening safety protocols in

countries with nuclear reactors, regardless of their plans for continued use of nuclear energy, through a sound system of governance emphasizing safety standards and measures, accountability, transparency and redress mechanisms which should be in place prior to nuclear energy promotion;

• Lessons from around the region should be shared on disaster risk reduction and mobilizing

communities in meaningful participation and decision making at each stage of disaster planning;

• Policy frameworks need to be revised in view of the increasing number and severity of climate-

related disasters and to enable better horizontal coordination between the ministries responsible for climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction.

• Disaster education should be

further enhanced, as evidenced by successful examples in northern Japan of students evacuating by following the drills they had practiced.

Topic 1:Resilient and Sustainable Society

Outcome of ISAP2011

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 7

Building Resilient Societies (1) – Multi-level and multi- stakeholder governance



The importance of horizontal and vertical cooperation – In order to build a resilient society, a multi-level and multi-stakeholder scheme needs to be developed in; and it is necessary for each of them to conduct actions which can be delivered most efficiently.

• National governments having a

facilitating and enabling role

• Local government have the

responsibility for decision making and implementation, and for promoting horizontal cooperation and participation of different stakeholders.



The integrated system of top-down and bottom- up approaches has the potential for providing the

• pportunities to learn from each other and

can be built strengthen resilient societies.

National Government Local government NPO Private Sector Local government Horizontal cooperation

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 8

Building Resilient Societies (2) – Community based pro- poor approach

 Through experiences of climate change adaptation, the best

way to manage disaster is community based pro-poor approach (i.e. poor communities are more vulnerable, facing on more risks, have less access to resources, funds, political connections, and information)

• A local community has in-depth knowledge of local environment and

society, and it is quite useful for the disaster prevention.

• At the recovery stage from the disaster, participation from local

community with autonomy is important.

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 9

Safe, secure, and low-carbon energy (1)



After the triple disaster, Japan faced serious shortages in energy supply



Think, review and revise energy and climate change policy, it is possible in Japan to abandon-nuclear energy from:

 (1) Right energy mix in the near future with moderate cost burden on the economy; and  (2) Balance of supply and demand side of energy for households and small- and medium-

enterprises (SMEs). 

(1) Right energy mix



Based on the preliminary result of various research scenarios, renewable energy scenario is less expensive than other options, which avoiding high cost energy import and strengthening energy supply security. This is the potential to be the most valuable policy option in Japan.



Japan’s indigenous resources like geothermal and tidal potential needs to be explored further and renewable energy needs to be aggressively promoted in the country to achieve energy security

[Ref.: A. Bhachattarya]

JPN_FFS_LR JPN_FFS_SR JPN_REN_LR FIX 0.35%

• 1.60%

1.83% INV 0.82% 2.93% 2.15% VAR 4.10% 5.36%

• 6.37%

Total 1.11% 2.41% 1.12%

• 8.00%
• 6.00%
• 4.00%
• 2.00%

0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% % chnage to baseline

% Change in system costs compared to baseline

1000.0 1050.0 1100.0 1150.0 1200.0 1250.0 1300.0 1350.0 1400.0 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Million ton

Total CO2 emissions comparison

REF FFS-LR FFS-SR REN

0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 2020 2030 2040 2050

% Change in cost of electricity production to REF

FFS-LR FFS-SR REN

Preliminary Result

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 10

Safe, secure, and low-carbon energy (2)



(2) Balance of supply and demand side of energy for households and small- and medium-enterprises (SMEs) – “Green Innovation” initiated by local government



Comprehensive energy system management: demand and supply side framework for sustainable and stable households and SMEs –reform of energy supply system considering demand side energy saving.



A combination of reducing energy consumption and strengthening energy efficiency regulations of products, housings, and buildings, promoting both life and work styles reforms

wind solar biomass hydro battery Energy Supply

<SMEs> Green electricity

<Households> Home electrical appliance

Energy Demand Energy System Management Initiated by Local Government

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 11

 The implication and definition of a green economy may vary depending on each country’s development stage, but all countries share the common goal of sustainable development. Establishing a green economy is a key interim implementing strategy for sustainable development.  The existing economic system does not fully account for environmental and social costs; the nuclear disaster in northern Japan is a clear case of the necessity of developing a green economy by incorporating resilience and the precautionary principle.  A green economy should have the twin goals of poverty alleviation and quality

• f life.

While poverty exists in every country, developed countries should take the leadership for promoting a green economy by shifting their consumption from goods to services and shifting their economic behavior towards increased quality of life.  Education and technology transfer are critical components of a green economy.

Topic 2: Green Economy

Outcome of ISAP2011

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 12

Key challenges for greening economy

• Economic context

Incorporation of social and environmental costs in the global economic system

• Environmental context
• Social context

Eradication of poverty and fulfill the basic human needs of all individuals Keeping the ecological capital sound and sustainable

• Political context

Shift from short-term thinking to longer-term and integrative view

• International context

Developmental gap between developed and developing countries

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 13

Measures for global green economy (1)

Production

Sustainable Consumption and Production

Decoupling between economic growth and resource use through promotion of green technologies and industrial transformation from brown to green Consumption Shift towards green lifestyle from mass consumption and promotion of governmental green procurement Inter-linkage Contribution to employment and poverty reduction Intergrated policy intervention Visualisation of environmental impacts e.g. green tax and subsidies green labelling Full examination of the appropriate stage of product life cycle for intervention in terms of cost effectiveness and efficiency.

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 14

Measures for global green economy (2)

Development of Alternative Indicators

Scaling up the existing incentive mechanisms and developing innovative implementation tools will be a first step Alternative or supplementary indicators to the current GDP for integration of social and environmental aspects e.g. gross national happiness, green accounting Contribution to change in value of the people from income maximization to enlargement of quality of life Contribution to enable political decision making based on a longer-term perspective To visualise externality, thereby to elaborate and adopt such indicators....

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 15

Measures for global green economy (3)

Developed countries – show initiative

International Cooperation

Developing countries – follow direction Mechanism to promote international cooperation and technology transfer But bear in mind…. Not to promote green protectionism Not to encourage export of brown industries from one country to another Green economy cannot be achieved within a single country, as economy is interlinked between countries in a globalised world

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 16

 Need more emphasis on integrating sustainable development concerns in

• ther policy areas; especially cooperation between different ministries

 Regional institutions can help persuade national governments from the top down, but sub-national governments and civil society organizations can also work from the bottom-up.  Need increased understanding by policy makers and the public that Sustainable Development can make significant contributions to poverty reduction and economic development.  Need a global or regional agreement on access to information to support genuine, informed multi-stakeholder participation in decision-making. East Asia has many underfunded regional cooperation mechanisms resulting in fragmentation and overlap, similar to the global situation. A regional

• rganisation for information and capacity development could improve

coordination and effectiveness. Such an organization could be new or based

• n existing ones.

Topic 3: IFSD

Outcome of ISAP2011

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 17

Key Challenges

 Much stronger institutional framework for sustainable

development (IFSD) is needed

 Institutional changes with coherent SD goals at

global, regional, national and local levels

 Leadership, coordination, effectiveness, information,

participation, compliance and enforcement

 Proper incentives, regulations, policies and actions  ……

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 18

 Problems can’t be solved at only one level  Different levels have different advantages & disadvantages  Solutions need cooperation between & within levels  ** Promote multistakeholder participation (at all levels)

Levels of Governance

 Global Multistakeholder Participation  Regional / Subregional  National  Subnational  Non-governmental **

• Business, NGOs, individuals, etc.

Solutions at all levels: Multilevel Governance

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 19

Proposals on UN Structure— Institutional Structure for Sustainable development (IFSD) 1. Need an umbrella organization for sustainable development.

• Option (1) ECOSOC with official sustainable development mandate

Option (2) new Sustainable Development Council Option (3) reformed CSD

• Should undertake assessments of the progress towards SD
• Should have participation of environment and non-environment

ministers

2. Need a high level individual person to promote sustainable development

• e.g. High Commissioner of Sustainable Development

3. Greater Participation and Coordination with Bretton Woods Institutions and Multilateral Development Banks

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 20

Proposals on UN Structure— International Environmental Governance (IEG) 4. UNEP enhancement – 2 phases reform Short-term: Universal membership of UNEP Governing Council

• Enhance legitimacy of UNEP’s actions and decisions
• Enable better coordination of multilateral environment

agreements (e.g. timing of meetings)

Mid- and Long-term: World (or UN) Environment Organization

• Increased mandate and autonomy
• Enhanced capacity building function in national policy

formulation and reporting, in MEA implementation, coordinating with others such as UNDP and World Bank, in line with the “One UN” concept.

• Should have more regular and predictable funding

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 21

Proposals on UN Structure— International Environmental Governance (IEG)

Source: Thrust of IEG Reform (Olsen, 2011)

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 22

IEG implications for Asia-Pacific region

 Many countries are facing serious environmental

challenges

 Need more capacity development & information sharing  Many underfunded small existing international cooperation

mechanisms resulting in fragmentation and overlap

 Regional organization for capacity development and

information sharing, e.g. Asia-Pacific Environmental Focal Point with Asia-Pacific Topic Centres

 An organization could be new or based on existing

• nes

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 23

Funding for Environment

 Environment funding is low  Need to Consider New Potential Sources

– e.g. Reallocation from national defense budgets (e.g. 0.5% )  Investment for avoiding security issues derived from

environmental problems, resource scarcity, environmental refugees, etc.

– e.g. International tax on currency transactions, international air travel,

etc.

 Collaborative international efforts (not dependent on contributions

from governments)

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 24

Overall implications for NEA

 Information sharing and further cooperation on resilience

and sustainability could be promoted in the existing frameworks, such as NEASPEC and TEMM.

 Green Economy/Green Growth concepts and activities,

actively promoted by the Republic of Korea and UNESCAP could be further mainstreamed in other

• countries. Cooperation frameworks in NEA could be

further strengthend.

 Strengthening IFSD/IEG is necessary at a sub-regional

• level. Streamlining the current institutional frameworks

could contribute to this objective.

IGES | http://www.iges.or.jp Sixteenth Senior Officials Meeting (SOM) of NEASPEC, 1-2 September, Seoul, Korea 25

Thank you very much for your attention.

http://www.iges.or.jp/