Boyertown Area School District Renovations & Additions to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Boyertown Area School District

Renovations & Additions to Boyertown Area High School

Community Update April 2014

Project History

• 2012 District-Wide Feasibility Study
• 2005 and 2011 Demographic Study

Complete information on both studies are on the Boyertown Area School District website at:

http://www.boyertownasd.org/site/default.aspx?PageType=3&Domai nID=4&ModuleInstanceID=1623&ViewID=047E6BE3-6D87-4130-8424- D8E4E9ED6C2A&RenderLoc=0&FlexDataID=1992&PageID=1

Demographic Study #1 MEA 2005

• In 2005 the Mid-Atlantic Employer’s Association was contracted to

perform a District Demographic Study and enrollment projection

• The MEA study was presented in January 2006 and an Ad-Hoc

Committee to investigate growth was established by the School Board

• The committee recommendation was to realign attendance areas,

pushing the student population west alleviating some of the

• vercrowding at the eastern most elementary schools

Demographic Study #2 PEL 2011

• The decline of the housing market in 2006 through 2008 helped to

slow the student growth although New Hanover Township reported 100 new homes constructed on average each year

• In 2011, the School Board approached the Pennsylvania Economy

League (PEL) to perform another demographic study and update enrollment projections

• The study was presented at the October 2011 Board meeting and

the projection was that the District would increase student population by 600 students over the next 10 years

Feasibility Study

• Increased enrollment, aging buildings and a 10-year old

feasibility study prompted the School Board to update the District’s Feasibility Study

• Through an RFP process, architects were approved in 2012 to

perform the study of the District’s buildings and provide suggestions for improvements and expansion to accommodate the future student additions

Project Goals

• Develop and maintain a collaborative environment
• Develop and maintain an academy structure

(smaller learning communities)

• Develop and maintain a Grade 9 academy (smaller

learning community) within the academy structure

• Develop and maintain campus security

Supporting 21st Century Skills

• Communication
• Collaboration
• Creative Thinking
• Critical Thinking
• Problem Solvers

Design Team Focus Questions

• What is the most efficient core content area classroom

academy design layout utilizing the current project scope & design?

• What is the best core content classroom design that would

best meet our building project goals and supporting 21st century skills?

• How can we best utilize our provided collaborative space (e.g.

teacher, student, teacher/student) to best meet our building project goals and supporting 21st century skills?

• What campus security measures can be taken to best support
• ur building project goals and supporting 21st century skills?

OVERALL LL SITE

SITE PLAN – MONROE STREET T EXTENSION

SITE PLAN – MONROE STREET T & MONTGOMERY AVE INTERSE SECTION CTION

OVERALL LL FLOOR PLAN First Floor Plan

9th

th GRADE ACADEMY (Smaller

aller Lear arnin ing Community ity) First Floor Plan

9th

th GRADE ACADEMY (Smaller

aller Lear arnin ing Community ity) Secon

• nd

d Floor Plan

9th

th GRADE ACADEMY (Smaller

aller Lear arnin ing Community ity) Third Floor Plan

9th

th GRADE ACADEMY (Smaller

aller Lear arnin ing Community ity) Science

HEALTH TH AND GUIDANCE First Floor Plan

ENTREPRENE ENEUR ACADEMY AND ROTC First Floor Plan

ADMINIST STRATI TION AND CAFETERIA IA EXPANSION First Floor Plan

CAFETERIA IA & LIFE SKILLS LLS ROOM IMPROVEMENT ENTS First Floor Plan

STEM ACADEMY First Floor Plan

MUSIC AND ART First Floor Plan

MUSIC First Floor Plan

ART First Floor Plan

GYM ADDITION ION AND ADAPTIV IVE E GYM First Floor Plan

2nd

nd FLOOR PLAN

CHEMISTR TRY ROOMS Secon

• nd

d Floor Plan

LEVEL L OF RENOVATIONS-1st

st Floor – SCHEMATIC

TIC DESIGN Level l 1 1 (grey), , Level 2 (green), ), Level l 3 (magen genta ta), , Additi ition

• ns

s (blue)

LEVEL L OF RENOVATIONS-2nd

nd Floor – SCHEMATI

TIC C DESIGN Level l 1 1 (grey), , Level 2 (green), ), Level l 3 (magen genta ta), , Additi ition

• ns

s (blue)

SQUARE FOOT TAKE-OFF OF BUILDING AREA

$56.20 $1,787,385 $69.60 $13,419,298 $143.40 $10,613,751 $140.30 $7,927,371 $237.75 $5,859,586

Building Renovation Cost $25,820,434 $5,859,586 $7,927,371 $4,115,500 Food Service Equipment $400,000 SUBTOTAL $44,122,891 $2,987,097 $47,109,988 $7,998,017 $4,100,000 $1,800,000 $61,000,000 Soft Costs Subtotal New Construction Renovate 1930's Original High School Building Roofing - New & Re-roofing SUBTOTAL Sitecosts - includes Monroe St. Extension & Utility Upgrades Excluding PennDOT Requirements ProjectContingency & PennDOT Costs 1920 / 1930's Building Contingency Total Project Budget

New Construction Level 1 Renovations GRAY Level 2 Renovations GREEN Level 3 Renovations MAGENTA Level 3 1920/1930's Building

24,646 31,804 192,806 74,015 56,503 EXTENT OF RENOVATIONS S – SCHEMATIC TIC DESIGN Feb. . 4, 2014 KCBA Architec tects ts, , DEI, and Boye yertow

• wn Area School
• l District

ict

1.

• 1. Board Approv
• val of Conc

ncept t Des esign & B Budget et Nove vember mber 12, , 2013 and Decision sion to to Proceed 2.

• 2. Schemati

atic Design ign Januar uary y 28, , 2014 2014 (Does not

t requi uire e PDE appr proval) l)

3.

• 3. Design

ign Devel velop

• pme

ment t May y 2014

(Does not t requi uire PDE Appr proval) l)

4.

• 4. Cons

nstru truct ctio ion Docume ments nts Septem tember r 2014

PlanC anCon ‘F’ Approval

5.

• 5. Project

ject Bids Received d Octo tobe ber r 2014 Pendi

nding ng receipt ipt of Appr provals

6.

• 6. Board Awa

ward of Bids and Notice ice to to Proceed Nov. . / D / Dec

• ec. 2014

Submit

mit Plancon ncon ‘G’ Pending receipt of Approvals

7.

• 7. Cons

nstru truct ctio ion (To Be D Deter termi mined) d) 2½ - 3 Years

Note: As per PDE’s confirmation, all previous PlanCon subm bmittals ittals are re acceptab able le. Plan anCo Con submit bmittals tals are re not t re requ quir ired d until til PlanCon ‘F’

ROAD AD MAP P TO PROJE JECT CT IMPLEMENT LEMENTATION TION

DISCUSS SSION ION