boundary conditions for a solid state divertor in a
play

Boundary Conditions for a Solid State Divertor in a Fusion Power - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Max-Planck-Institut fr Plasmaphysik Boundary Conditions for a Solid State Divertor in a Fusion Power Plant Rudolf Neu Max-Planck-Institut fr Plasmaphysik, D-85748 Garching, Germany 1 st IAEA Technical Meeting on Divertor Concepts, Vienna,


  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik Boundary Conditions for a Solid State Divertor in a Fusion Power Plant Rudolf Neu Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, D-85748 Garching, Germany 1 st IAEA Technical Meeting on Divertor Concepts, Vienna, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct. 2015

  2. G.F. Federici ‘ Design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO’, ISFNT 2015 Outstanding Technical Challenges with Gaps beyond ITER For any further fusion step, safety, T-breeding, power exhaust, RH, component lifetime and plant availability, are important design drivers and CANNOT be compromised Tritium breeding blanket Power Exhaust - most novel part of DEMO - Peak heat fluxes near - TBR >1 marginally technological limits achievable but with (>10 MW/m 2 ) thin PFCs/few penetrations - ITER solution may be marginal - Feasibility concerns/ for DEMO performance uncertainties Advanced divertor solutions - with all concepts -> R&D may be needed but integration - Selection now is premature is very challenging - ITER TBM is important Structural and HHF Materials Remote Maintenance - Progressive blanket operation strategy (1 st blanket 20 dpa; 2 nd blanket 50 dpa) - Strong impact on IVC design - Embrittlement of RAFM steels and Cu-alloys at - Significant differences with ITER low temp. and loss of mechanical strength at ~ RM approach for blanket high temp. - RH schemes affects plant design - Need of structural design criteria and design and layout codes - Large size Hot Cell required - Technical down selection and development of an - Service Joining Technology Early Neutron Source (IFMIF-DONES) R&D is urgently needed. G. Federici & PPPT Team | ISFNT-12 |Jeju Island (Korea)| 14/09/2015| Page 2

  3. G.F. Federici ‘ Design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO’, ISFNT 2015 Outstanding Technical Challenges with Gaps beyond ITER For any further fusion step, safety, T-breeding, power exhaust, RH, component lifetime and plant availability, are important design drivers and CANNOT be compromised Tritium breeding blanket Power Exhaust - most novel part of DEMO - Peak heat fluxes near - TBR >1 marginally technological limits achievable but with (>10 MW/m 2 ) thin PFCs/few penetrations - ITER solution may be marginal - Feasibility concerns/ for DEMO performance uncertainties Advanced divertor solutions - with all concepts -> R&D may be needed but integration - Selection now is premature is very challenging - ITER TBM is important Structural and HHF Materials Remote Maintenance - Progressive blanket operation strategy (1 st blanket 20 dpa; 2 nd blanket 50 dpa) - Strong impact on IVC design - Embrittlement of RAFM steels and Cu-alloys at - Significant differences with ITER low temp. and loss of mechanical strength at ~ RM approach for blanket high temp. - RH schemes affects plant design - Need of structural design criteria and design and layout codes - Large size Hot Cell required - Technical down selection and development of an - Service Joining Technology Early Neutron Source (IFMIF-DONES) R&D is urgently needed. G. Federici & PPPT Team | ISFNT-12 |Jeju Island (Korea)| 14/09/2015| Page 3

  4. G.F. Federici ‘Design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO’, ISFNT 2015 DEMO Physics Basis / Operating Point • Readiness of underlying physics assumptions makes the difference. • The systems code PROCESS is being used to underpin EU DEMO design studies, and another code (SYCOMORE), is under development. G. Federici & PPPT Team | ISFNT-12 |Jeju Island (Korea)| 14/09/2015| Page 4

  5. G.F. Federici ‘Design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO’, ISFNT 2015 Divertor and H-mode Operation as “size - drivers“ • One crucial point is the size of the device and the amount of power that can be reliably produced and controlled in it. • This is the subject of research and depends upon the assumptions that are made on the readiness of required advances in physics, technology and materials developments. • Main objectives: *Protect divertor P sep =P α +P add -P rad,core  Physics/ Material limits P sep /R ≤17MW/m *H-mode operation (P LH  R):  f LH= P sep /P LH,scal → confinement quality and controllability P sep ≥ P LH R. Kemp (CCFE) - PROCESS Fix P el,net =500 MW  pulse = 2 h - Scan Z eff G. Federici & PPPT Team | ISFNT-12 |Jeju Island (Korea)| 14/09/2015| Page 5

  6. G.F. Federici ‘Design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO’, ISFNT 2015 Preliminary DEMO Design Choices under Evaluation Design features (near-term DEMO): DEMO1 DEMO2 • 2000 MW th ~500 Mw e • Pulses > 2 hrs • SN water cooled divertor • PFC armour: W • LTSC magnets Nb 3 Sn (grading) • B max conductor ~12 T (depends on A) Under • RAFM (EUROFER) as blanket structure revision • VV made of AISI 316 • Blanket vertical RH / divertor cassettes • Lifetime: starter blanket: 20 dpa (200 appm He); 2 nd blanket 50 dpa; ITER DEMO1 DEMO2 divertor: 5 dpa (Cu) (2015) A=3.1 (2015) A=2.6 R 0 / a (m) 6.2 / 2.0 9.1 / 2.9 7.5 / 2.9 Κ 95 / δ 95 1.7 / 0.33 1.6 / 0.33 1.8 / 0.33 Open Choices: A (m 2 )/ Vol (m 3 ) 683 / 831 1428 / 2502 1253 / 2217 • Operating scenario H non-rad-corr / β N (%) 1.0 / 2.0 1.0 / 2.6 1.2 / 3.8 • Breeding blanket design concept selection P sep (MW) 104 154 150 • Primary Blanket Coolant/ BoP P F (MW) / P NET (MW) 500 / 0 2037 / 500 3255 / 953 • Protection strategy first wall (e.g., limiters) I p (MA) / f bs 15 / 0.24 20 / 0.35 22 / 0.61 B at R 0 (T) 5.3 5.7 5.6 • Advanced divertor configurations B max , conductor (T) 11.8 12.3 15.6 • Number of coils BB i/b / o/b (m) 0.45 / 0.45 1.1 / 2.1 1.0 / 1.9 Av NWL MW/m 2 0.5 1.1 1.9 O-6 : F. Maviglia G. Federici & PPPT Team | ISFNT-12 |Jeju Island (Korea)| 14/09/2015| Page 6

  7. Boundary Conditions for Divertor Plasma Facing Components • Plasma Compatibility: R-2: A. Leonard R-6: M. Wischmeier radiation, dilution, stability, … R-8: W. Morris I-3: B. Lipschultz • Tritium Compatibility: I-10: J.W. Coenen retention, co- deposition, penetration, … • Erosion Behaviour: I-10: J.W. Coenen I-5: S. Hong lifetime, dust production, … P4: S. Khirwadkar P5: Th. Loewenhoff • ‚Corrosion‘ Issues: reactions with seeding impurities, air, water, … I-10: J.W. Coenen • Thermo-Mechanical Behaviour: I-11: Rieth I-10: Coenen I-6: Firdaouss thermal conductivity, strength, DBTT, … O-6: Riesch O-11: You P-8: Nikolic • Joining Issues: I-11: M. Rieth O-11: J.-H.You joining to / compatibility with heat sink materials, … • Behaviour Under n-Irradiation: I-11: M. Rieth I-10: J.W. Coenen activation, transmutation, change of thermo- mechanical properties, … • Industrial production routes: availability, scalability, reliability of processes, … O-10: N. Wang / G. Luo 1 st IAEA TM on Divertor Concepts, Vienna, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct. 2015 Rudolf Neu 7

  8. Basic Plasma - Wall Interaction Processes PWI & PFM determine • component lifetime Reflection • T retention • dust production • plasma compatibility Re-deposition Erosion T co deposition Plasma Facing Material 1 st IAEA TM on Divertor Concepts, Vienna, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct. 2015 Rudolf Neu 8

  9. P/R as a figure of merit Device P heat /R upstream q || unmitig. q  (  int = 2.6 mm) * (MW/m 2 ) (GW/m 2 ) (MW/m) JET 7-12 2 8 AUG 14 3.5 13 ITER 20 5 20  30 DEMO 80-100 115 *based on the scaling of upstream SOL width (no size scaling and no radiation losses) by T. Eich et al. PRL 2011, see also A. Scarabosio JNM 2013  strong mitigation (> factor 7) of heat flux necessary  radiative cooling (bulk, SOL & divertor) M. Wischmeier , JNM 2015 1 st IAEA TM on Divertor Concepts, Vienna, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct. 2015 Rudolf Neu 9

  10. Steady state and transient thermal loads (in ITER) permanent degradation of material power density / MWm -2 Disruptions frequencies disruptions fast current quench for different n  200 events in ITER VDEs VDEs 10 3 Vertical Displacement ELMs n  1000 Events n  10 6 (loss of position control) divertor n  10 ELMs: ´steady state´ 1 transients Edge Localized Modes (periodical ejection of first wall particles and energy in high confinement (H)-Mode) 10 -3 1 10 3 (  all transients need mitigation!) duration / s after J. Linke Phys. Scripta 2006 1 st IAEA TM on Divertor Concepts, Vienna, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct. 2015 Rudolf Neu 10

  11. Operational domain of high power H-mode in AUG R=6.2 m A. Kallenbach R=1.65 m et al., NF 2015 P sep /R is divertor identity parameter, provided similar density and power width  applying the ITER divertor solution to DEMO, high f rad is needed! 1 st IAEA TM on Divertor Concepts, Vienna, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct. 2015 Rudolf Neu 11

  12. Bulk radiation will strongly narrow operational range 0-D Calculations for Ignition He Concentrations are typically 10-20% (for  He /  E =5) T. Pütterich, EFPW Split 2014 1 st IAEA TM on Divertor Concepts, Vienna, 29 Sep. – 2 Oct. 2015 Rudolf Neu 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend