boundaries of reduced c algebras of discrete groups
play

Boundaries of reduced C*-algebras of discrete groups Matthew - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Boundaries of reduced C*-algebras of discrete groups Matthew Kennedy (joint work with Mehrdad Kalantar) Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada June 23, 2014 1 Definition A discrete group G is amenable if there is a left-invariant mean i.e. a


  1. Boundaries of reduced C*-algebras of discrete groups Matthew Kennedy (joint work with Mehrdad Kalantar) Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada June 23, 2014 1

  2. Definition A discrete group G is amenable if there is a left-invariant mean i.e. a unital positive G -invariant linear map. In this case, is a unital positive G -equivariant projection. λ : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → C ,

  3. Definition A discrete group G is amenable if there is a left-invariant mean i.e. a unital positive G -invariant linear map. λ : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → C , In this case, λ is a unital positive G -equivariant projection.

  4. Reframed Definition A discrete group G is amenable if there is a unital positive G -equivariant projection Therefore, G is non-amenable if is “too small” to be the range of a unital positive G -equivariant projection on G . λ : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → C .

  5. Reframed Definition A discrete group G is amenable if there is a unital positive G -equivariant projection λ : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → C . Therefore, G is non-amenable if C is “too small” to be the range of a unital positive G -equivariant projection on ℓ ∞ ( G ) .

  6. G should somehow “measure” the non-amenability of G . Idea unital positive G -equivariant projection The size of Consider the minimal C*-subalgebra A G of ℓ ∞ ( G ) such that there is a P : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → A G .

  7. Idea unital positive G -equivariant projection Consider the minimal C*-subalgebra A G of ℓ ∞ ( G ) such that there is a P : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → A G . The size of A G should somehow “measure” the non-amenability of G .

  8. Theorem (Kalantar-K 2014) unital positive G-equivariant projection There is a unique minimal C*-algebra A G arising as the range of a P : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → A G . The algebra A G is isomorphic to the algebra C ( ∂ F G ) of continuous functions on the Furstenberg boundary ∂ F G of G .

  9. Motivation

  10. Kirchberg proved that every exact C*-algebra can be embedded into a nuclear C*-algebra. In the separable case, Kirchberg and Phillips proved the nuclear C*-algebra can be taken to be the Cuntz algebra on two generators.

  11. Kirchberg proved that every exact C*-algebra can be embedded into a nuclear C*-algebra. In the separable case, Kirchberg and Phillips proved the nuclear C*-algebra can be taken to be the Cuntz algebra on two generators.

  12. Ozawa conjectured the existence of what he calls a “tight” nuclear embedding. Conjecture (Ozawa 2007) The algebra will inherit many properties from , for example simplicity and primality. Let A be an exact C*-algebra. There is a canonical nuclear C*-algebra N ( A ) such that A ⊂ N ( A ) ⊂ I ( A ) , where I ( A ) denotes the injective envelope of A .

  13. Ozawa conjectured the existence of what he calls a “tight” nuclear embedding. Conjecture (Ozawa 2007) simplicity and primality. Let A be an exact C*-algebra. There is a canonical nuclear C*-algebra N ( A ) such that A ⊂ N ( A ) ⊂ I ( A ) , where I ( A ) denotes the injective envelope of A . The algebra N ( A ) will inherit many properties from A , for example

  14. n denote the reduced C*-algebra of n for n n . n is exact since n is an exact group. n Note that C r denotes the injective envelope of C r n where I C r n I C r Ozawa proved this conjecture for the reduced C*-algebra of the free N C r C r such that n canonical nuclear C*-algebra N C r . There is a Let C r Theorem (Ozawa 2007) n group F n on n ≥ 2 generators.

  15. n is exact since n is an exact group. Note that C r Ozawa proved this conjecture for the reduced C*-algebra of the free Theorem (Ozawa 2007) group F n on n ≥ 2 generators. Let C ∗ r ( F n ) denote the reduced C*-algebra of F n for n ≥ 2 . There is a canonical nuclear C*-algebra N ( C ∗ r ( F n )) such that C ∗ r ( F n ) ⊂ N ( C ∗ r ( F n )) ⊂ I ( C ∗ r ( F n )) , where I ( C ∗ r ( F n )) denotes the injective envelope of C ∗ r ( F n ) .

  16. Ozawa proved this conjecture for the reduced C*-algebra of the free Theorem (Ozawa 2007) group F n on n ≥ 2 generators. Let C ∗ r ( F n ) denote the reduced C*-algebra of F n for n ≥ 2 . There is a canonical nuclear C*-algebra N ( C ∗ r ( F n )) such that C ∗ r ( F n ) ⊂ N ( C ∗ r ( F n )) ⊂ I ( C ∗ r ( F n )) , where I ( C ∗ r ( F n )) denotes the injective envelope of C ∗ r ( F n ) . Note that C ∗ r ( F n ) is exact since F n is an exact group.

  17. Key Proposition (Ozawa 2007) Let be a quasi-invariant doubly ergodic measure on G . If C n L G is a unital positive n -equivariant map, then id. Ozawa takes N ( C ∗ r ( F n )) = C ( ∂ F n ) ⋊ r F n , where ∂ F n denotes the hyperbolic boundary of F n .

  18. Key Proposition (Ozawa 2007) Ozawa takes N ( C ∗ r ( F n )) = C ( ∂ F n ) ⋊ r F n , where ∂ F n denotes the hyperbolic boundary of F n . Let µ be a quasi-invariant doubly ergodic measure on ∂ G . If φ : C ( ∂ F n ) → L ∞ ( ∂ G , µ ) is a unital positive F n -equivariant map, then φ = id.

  19. Equivariant Injective Envelopes

  20. An operator system is a unital self-adjoint subspace of a C*-algebra. A G-operator system is an operator system equipped with the action of a group G , i.e. a unital homomorphism from G into the group of order isomorphisms on .

  21. An operator system is a unital self-adjoint subspace of a C*-algebra. A G-operator system is an operator system equipped with the action of a group G , i.e. a unital homomorphism from G into the group of order isomorphisms on S .

  22. When the objects are operator systems and the morphisms are unital completely positive maps, we get injectivity . When the objects are G -operator systems and the morphisms are G -equivariant unital completely positive maps, we get G-injectivity . Let C be a category consisting of objects and morphisms. An object I is injective in C if, for every pair of objects E ⊂ F and and every morphism φ : E → I , there is an extension ˜ φ : F → I .

  23. When the objects are operator systems and the morphisms are unital completely positive maps, we get injectivity . When the objects are G -operator systems and the morphisms are G -equivariant unital completely positive maps, we get G-injectivity . Let C be a category consisting of objects and morphisms. An object I is injective in C if, for every pair of objects E ⊂ F and and every morphism φ : E → I , there is an extension ˜ φ : F → I .

  24. When the objects are operator systems and the morphisms are unital completely positive maps, we get injectivity . When the objects are G -operator systems and the morphisms are G -equivariant unital completely positive maps, we get G-injectivity . Let C be a category consisting of objects and morphisms. An object I is injective in C if, for every pair of objects E ⊂ F and and every morphism φ : E → I , there is an extension ˜ φ : F → I .

  25. The G-injective envelope of a G -operator system is the minimal G -injective operator system containing . The injective envelope of an operator system S is the minimal injective operator system containing S .

  26. The injective envelope of an operator system S is the minimal injective operator system containing S . The G-injective envelope of a G -operator system S is the minimal G -injective operator system containing S .

  27. Theorem (Hamana 1985) extends to a unital completely isometric G-equivariant embedding Since there is a unital completely isometric G -equivariant embedding of into G there are unital completely isometric G -equivariant embeddings I G G If S is a G-operator system, then S has a unique G-injective envelope I G ( S ) . Every unital completely isometric G-equivariant embedding φ : S → T , φ : I G ( S ) → T . ˜

  28. Theorem (Hamana 1985) extends to a unital completely isometric G-equivariant embedding Since there is a unital completely isometric G -equivariant embedding embeddings If S is a G-operator system, then S has a unique G-injective envelope I G ( S ) . Every unital completely isometric G-equivariant embedding φ : S → T , φ : I G ( S ) → T . ˜ of S into ℓ ∞ ( G , S ) there are unital completely isometric G -equivariant S ⊂ I G ( S ) ⊂ ℓ ∞ ( G , S ) .

  29. Upshot unital completely isometric G -equivariant embeddings The G -injective envelope I G has a natural C*-algebra structure (induced by the Choi-Effros product). If S is an operator system equipped with a G -action, then there are S ⊂ I G ( S ) ⊂ ℓ ∞ ( G , S ) , and a unital positive G -equivariant projection P : ℓ ∞ ( G , S ) → I G ( S ) .

  30. Upshot unital completely isometric G -equivariant embeddings (induced by the Choi-Effros product). If S is an operator system equipped with a G -action, then there are S ⊂ I G ( S ) ⊂ ℓ ∞ ( G , S ) , and a unital positive G -equivariant projection P : ℓ ∞ ( G , S ) → I G ( S ) . The G -injective envelope I G ( S ) has a natural C*-algebra structure

  31. Corollary and there is a unital positive G-equivariant projection The G -injective envelope I G is a commutative C*-algebra equipped with a G -action, so there is a compact G -space space H G such that I G C H G . We call H G the Hamana boundary of G . Let G be a discrete group acting trivially on C and let I G ( C ) denote the G-injective envelope of C . Then C ⊂ I G ( C ) ⊂ ℓ ∞ ( G ) , P : ℓ ∞ ( G ) → I G ( C ) .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend