Body Effect (Back Bias) Body Effect (Back Bias) Drain 2 qN 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

body effect back bias body effect back bias
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Body Effect (Back Bias) Body Effect (Back Bias) Drain 2 qN 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Remember the Standard V t Equation? Short Channel MOS Transistor 2 qN 2 = + + a si B 2 V V t fb B C ox Y. Taur, T. Ning, Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, Professor Chris H. Kim Cambridge University Press,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Short Channel MOS Transistor

Professor Chris H. Kim

University of Minnesota

  • Dept. of ECE

chriskim@umn.edu www.umn.edu/~chriskim/

2

Remember the Standard Vt Equation?

  • x

B si a B fb t

C qN V V ψ ε ψ 2 2 2 + + =

  • Detailed derivation given in Taur’s book
  • Basically, three terms

– Flat band voltage – 2ψB: the magic number for on-set of inversion – Oxide voltage

  • Y. Taur, T. Ning, Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices,

Cambridge University Press, 2002.

3

Body Effect (Back Bias)

  • x

sb B si a B fb t sb

  • x

sb B si a sb B fb t

  • x

B si a B fb t

C V qN V V V C V qN V V V C qN V V + + + = − + + + + = + + = ψ ε ψ ψ ε ψ ψ ε ψ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

  • Body effect degrades transistor stack performance
  • However, we need a reasonable body effect for post silicon

tuning techniques

  • Reverse body biasing, forward body biasing

Drain Gate Source Body +

  • Vsb

Vsb > 0 : RBB Vsb < 0 : FBB

4

Body Effect (Back Bias)

  • Vt can be adjusted by applying FBB or RBB

– Essential for low power and high performance – Will talk about body biasing extensively later on

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 0.925 1 1.075 1.15 1.225 Normalized frequency Normalized leakage 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Die count

NBB ABB Accepted dies:

0% 110C 1.1V

Body Biasing for Process Compensation

NBB ABB

Body bias: controllability to Vt

6

Short Channel Effect: Vt roll-off

  • Ability of gate & body to control channel charge diminishes

as L decreases, resulting in Vt-roll-off and body effect reduction

n+ poly gate p-type body n+ source n+ drain

Short Channel

n+ source n+ drain n+ poly gate p-type body

Long Channel

depletion

Ec Ec Charge sharing Charge sharing

Vt Leff

3σ L variation

  • 3σ Vt variation increases in short channel devices

Short Channel Effect: Vt roll-off

8 n+ source n+ drain n+ poly gate p-type body

Long Channel

  • Increase in VDS reduces Vt and increases Vt-roll-off: DIBL

n+ poly gate p-type body n+ source n+ drain

Short Channel

depletion

Short Channel Effect: Drain Induced Barrier Lowering (DIBL)

Ec Ec Vds ↑ Vds ↑

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

9

Vt Leff

DIBL+Vt roll-off (Vds=Vdd) Vt roll-off (Vds~0V)

Short Channel Effect: Drain Induced Barrier Lowering (DIBL)

10

  • DIBL coefficient
  • DIBL increases leakage current
  • Dynamic Vdd can reduce leakage because of DIBL

Short Channel Effect: DIBL

Vgs (NMOS) Vgs (PMOS) log(Ids) log(Ids)

ds t d

V V Δ Δ = λ

Vds=0.1V Vds=2.0V

11

Short Channel Vt Equation

7 . 2 2

) 9 . 2 )( 15 . )( 012 . ( 2 . 2

− −

⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ + + + = m X m W m T m L

j sd

  • x

d

μ μ μ μ λ L X X W

j j b

⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ − + − = 1 2 1 1 λ [Poon, IEDM, 1973] [Ng, TED, 1993]

  • x

B si a B fb t

C qN V V ψ ε ψ 2 2 2 + + =

(Long channel Vt equation)

ds d sb B s a

  • x

b B fb t

V V qN C V V λ ψ ε λ ψ − + + + = ) 2 ( 2 2

12

Transistor Scaling Challenges - Xj

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 50 100 150 200 Junction Depth (nm) IDN (mA/ μm) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 IDP (mA/ μm) NMOS PMOS 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 50 100 150 200 Junction Depth (nm) LMET ( μm) 90 100 110 120 130 R EXT ( Ω μm) LMET REXT RC RSE Rsalicide Salicide Poly-Si Salicide

  • S. Asai et al., 1997.
  • S. Thompson et al., 1998.
  • S. Thompson et al., 1998.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

13

Effect of Series Resistance

(10nm Device)

14

Leakage Components

[Keshavarzi, Roy, and Hawkins, ITC 1997]

Gate Source Drain

n+ n+

Bulk

Reverse Bias Diode & BTBT Gate Induced Drain Leakage (GIDL) Gate Oxide Tunneling Punchthrough Weak Inversion Current, Drain Induced Barrier Lowering and Narrow Width Effect

p-sub

15

Sub-Threshold Current

  • NPN BJT is formed in sub-threshold region
  • Only difference with a real BJT is that the base voltage is

controlled through a capacitive divider, and not directly by a electrode

  • Like in a BJT, current is exponential to Vbe

16

Sub-Threshold Current

( )

( )

) 1 ( 1

2 kT qV mkT V V q B

  • x

eff d

ds t gs

e e m q T k C L W I

− −

− − ⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ = μ

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

17

Sub-Threshold Swing

  • Smaller S-swing is better
  • Ideal case: m=1 (Cox>>Csub)

– Fundamental limit = 1 * 26mV * ln10 = 60 mV/dec @ RT – Can only be achieve by device geometry (FD-SOI)

  • Typical case: m≈1.3

– S = 1.3 * 26mV * ln10 ≈ 80 mV/dec @ RT – At worst case temperature (T=110C), S ≈ 100 mV/dec

  • x

dep

C C m dec mV q kT m S + = = 1 , ) ( 10 ln

18

Vdd and Vt Scaling

As Vt decreases, sub-threshold leakage increases Leakage is a barrier to voltage scaling Performance vs Leakage: VT ↓ IOFF ↑ ID(SAT) ↑

) ( ) (

3 T GS SAT

  • x

eff D

V V C W K SAT I − ∝ υ

2 2

) ( ) (

T GS eff eff D

V V K L W SAT I − ∝

q mkT V eff eff OFF

T

e K L W I

/ 1 −

∝ VGS

VTL VTH

log(IDS)

IOFFL IOFFH

19

Vdd and Vt Scaling

  • Vt cannot be scaled indefinitely due to increasing leakage

power (constant sub-threshold swing)

  • Example

CMOS device with S=100mV/dec has Ids=10μA/μm @ Vt=500mV Ioff=10μA/μm x 10-5 = 0.1 nA/μm Now, consider we scale the Vt to 100mV Ioff=10μA/μm x 10-1 = 1 μA/μm Suppose we have 1B transistors of width 1μm Isub=1μA/μm x 1B x 1μm = 100 A !!

20

Gate Oxide Tunneling Leakage

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Gate Voltage (V)

10-7 103 100 7 6 5 4 3 2 2 3 2.5nm 3.0nm 3.5nm 5.1nm 7.6nm

  • C. Hu, 1996.

IGATE (A/cm2) IOFF IGATE N+ Gate e- P- Substrate

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

21

Gate Oxide Tunneling Leakage

  • Quantum mechanics tells us that there is a finite

probability for electrons to tunnel through oxide

  • Probability of tunneling is higher for very thin
  • xides
  • NMOS gate leakage is much larger than PMOS
  • Gate leakage has the potential to become one of

the main showstoppers in device scaling

  • x

t dd

  • x

E B

  • x

gate

t V V E e AE I

  • x

− = =

,

2

22

Band-to-Band Tunneling Leakage

EC EC EV EV

p(+)-side n(+)-side

q(Vbi+Vapp)

S/D junction BTBT Leakage

  • Reversed biased diode band-to-band tunneling

– High junction doping: “Halo” profiles – Large electric field and small depletion width at the junctions

23

Gate Induced Drain Leakage (GIDL)

  • Appears in high E-field region under gate/drain
  • verlap causing deep depletion
  • Occurs at low Vg and high Vd bias
  • Generates carriers into substrate from surface

traps, band-to-band tunneling

  • Localized along channel width between gate and

drain

  • Thinner oxide, higher Vdd, lightly-doped drain

enhance GIDL

  • High field between gate and drain increases

injection of carriers into substrate

24

Narrow Width Effect

Vt W

Channel

Gate Side view of MOS transistor Extra depletion region

  • Depletion region extends
  • utside of gate controlled

region

  • Opposite to Vt roll-off
  • Depends on isolation

technology

width

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

25

Leakage Components

[IEEE press, 2000]