Board of Regents March 2007 Meeting William Streeter Steve - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

board of regents march 2007 meeting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Board of Regents March 2007 Meeting William Streeter Steve - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Board of Regents March 2007 Meeting William Streeter Steve McLaughlin John Desch Southeastern Wisconsins University of Opportunity Most diverse campus in the UW System 21% students of color 50% of freshmen work > 16


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Board of Regents March 2007 Meeting

William Streeter Steve McLaughlin John Desch

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Southeastern Wisconsin’s University of Opportunity

  • Most diverse campus in the UW System
  • 21% students of color
  • 50% of freshmen work > 16 hours/week
  • 85% of students commute to campus
  • 21% of those seeking a degree > 25 years old
  • 40% from lowest two quintiles of family income
  • 71% of students receiving financial aid
  • 66% of entering freshmen are first generation

students

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Plan diagram from the 1969 Master Development Plan illustrating a fully built campus serving 25,000 students.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Original campus vehicular circulation plan with restricted access ring roads and consolidated remote parking lots.

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Create identifiable campus entries
  • Simplify vehicular circulation
  • Provide better pedestrian and bicycle

access within campus and links to surrounding neighborhoods

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Maintain and enhance Parkside’s

“woodland and prairie” image

  • Preserve places for study of the

environment

  • Identify sustainability programs for

development and implementation across campus

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Honor and build upon existing

architectural patterns

  • Create more of a traditional campus

experience for resident students

  • Strengthen ties to the surrounding

communities

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Student Union Expansion First Floor Plan And Admissions Center

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Landscape Design Guidelines

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Architectural Design Guidelines – Campus Patterns

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Flexible Planning – Functional Relationships Organic Growth – Orthogonal Grid Campus in Motion – Ring & Restricted Roads

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Interconnected Objects – Continuous Corridor Movement Systems as Form Generators – Volumetric Expression Modern Movement – Daylight & Transparency

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Campus as Destination – Family of Entrances The Academic Concourse – Public & Private Layers The Connected Campus – Visual Connectivity

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Campus with a Heart – Student Centers

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Visual Criteria: Materials

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Visual Criteria: Heights

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Prominent building details in each visual area should be alike

  • r compatible. These details

include such items as exposed structural elements, window

  • penings, and parapets.”

Master Development Plan, 1969

Visual Criteria: Building Details

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Visual Criteria: Related Design Elements

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37