Blackwater Project Update Investor/Analyst Breakfast September 20, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

blackwater project update investor analyst breakfast
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Blackwater Project Update Investor/Analyst Breakfast September 20, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Blackwater Project Update Investor/Analyst Breakfast September 20, 2012 Cautionary statement All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Blackwater Project Update Investor/Analyst Breakfast

September 20, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 2

Cautionary statement

All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold's future financial or operating performance may be deemed "forward looking". All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, that address events or developments that New Gold expects to occur, are "forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", “projects”, “potential”, "believes" or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", “should”, "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative connotation. All such forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates

  • f management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold's ability to control or predict.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; impact of any hedging activities, including margin limits and margin calls; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated reserves and resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in international, national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of

  • btaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction that New Gold operates,

including, but not limited to Mexico where the Cerro San Pedro mine has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our EIS and Chile where the courts have temporarily suspended the approval of the environmental permit for the El Morro project; the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges the company is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; competition; loss of key employees; additional funding requirements; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as "Risk Factors" included in New Gold's disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws..

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 3

Cautionary statement (cont’d)

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations discussed in this presentation has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" used in this presentation are Canadian mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101 under guidelines set out in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by the CIM Council on December 11, 2005. While the terms "Mineral Resource", "Measured Mineral Resource", "Indicated Mineral Resource" and "Inferred Mineral Resource" are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve calculation is made. As such, certain information contained in this presentation concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements

  • f the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An "Inferred Mineral Resource" has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. It

cannot be assumed that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of Measured or Indicated Resources will ever be converted into Mineral

  • Reserves. Readers are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an "Inferred Mineral Resource" exists, or is economically or legally mineable. In addition, the definitions of "Proven

Mineral Reserves" and "Probable Mineral Reserves" under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFORMATION Certain of the scientific and technical information in this presentation is derived from the NI 43-101 compliant technical report entitled “Technical Report, Blackwater Gold Project, Omineca Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada” dated March 23, 2012, which is filed on SEDAR. Another NI 43-101 compliant technical report supporting the PEA and updated mineral resource estimate (“PEA Report”) will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days. The following qualified persons, as that term is defined in NI 43-101, have prepared or supervised the preparation of technical information relating to the PEA Report:

  • Mark Petersen, C.P.G. (New Gold Inc.)
  • Ronald G. Simpson, P Geo (GeoSim Services Inc.)
  • Herbert E. Welhener, MMSA – QPM (Independent Mining Consultants Inc.)
  • Bruno Borntraeger, P. Eng (Knight Piesold Ltd.)
  • Ignacy (Tony) Lipiec, P. Eng (AMEC)
  • Ramon Mendoza Reyes, P. Eng (AMEC)

Mark Petersen, C.P.G., is also responsible for approving the technical information in this presentation that is not related to the PEA Report. Other than Mark Petersen, who is an employee of New Gold, each of the qualified persons listed above are independent of New Gold.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 4

Cautionary statement (cont’d)

(1) TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce figures are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, which was a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products and included leading North American gold producers. The Gold Institute ceased operations in 2002, but the standard is widely accepted as the standard of reporting cash costs of production in North America. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. Total cash costs includes mine site operating costs such as mining, processing, administration, royalties and production taxes, but is exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs. Total cash costs is reduced by any by-product revenue and is then divided by ounces sold to arrive at the total by-product cash costs of sales. The measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of a company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-IFRS measure. Total cash costs presented does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative

  • f operating costs presented under IFRS.

(2) PEA – ADDITIONAL CAUTIONARY NOTE This note regarding the preliminary economic assessment (PEA) is in addition to cautionary language already included within the presentation as required under NI 43-101. The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these mineral resources will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 5

The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA based on these Mineral Resources will be realized. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.

Preliminary Economic Assessment Cautionary Language

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 6

Discussion topics

Introduction Randall Oliphant PEA Review Paul Hosford Next Steps Bob Gallagher Continued Exploration Mark Petersen Conclusion Randall Oliphant

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 7

Introduction

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 8

BLACKWATER ENHANCES NEW GOLD’S PORTFOLIO IN MULTIPLE WAYS

Blackwater overview

Asset of world-class scale Excellent jurisdiction Excitement of new discoveries/continued exploration upside Potential to increase value – from exploration through production Robust project economics

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 9

Experienced project team

Project Director Peter Marshall Feasibility Study Director Paul Hosford VP Exploration Mark Petersen Environmental Director Tim Bekhuys

  • 28 years in minerals exploration in roles ranging from corporate management, project

evaluations and acquisitions, generative exploration and project management

  • Over 30 years in the mining industry primarily with Placer Dome and Terrane Metals
  • Civil engineer with experience in feasibility management and project development
  • 30 years mining industry experience in operations and engineering, primarily with Barrick,

Hatch and Terrane Metals

  • Metallurgical engineer with experience in project management of feasibility studies and EPCM
  • Led successful permitting and environmental construction aspects of Mt. Milligan Copper-

Gold Mine in British Columbia

  • Experienced in community and First Nations engagement

Chief Executive Officer Robert Gallagher

  • Over 32 years in the mining industry in leadership roles with Placer Dome, Newmont Mining

and New Gold VP Operations Ernie Mast

  • Over 25 years in the mining industry in leadership roles with Inmet, Xstrata, Noranda and

Falconbridge Chief Financial Officer Brian Penny

  • Over 23 years of experience in mine finance and accounting in leadership roles with

Kinross, Western Goldfields and Silver Bear Resources

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 10

Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) in review(1)

Gold Price (US$/oz) $1,275 $1,600 $1,775 $1,800 Silver Price (US$/oz) $22.50 $30.00 $34.50 $35.00 US$/CDN$ Foreign Exchange 0.94 0.97 1.00 1.00 5% NPV ($ billions) (2015) Pre-tax NPV 1.7 3.3 4.2 4.3 After-tax NPV 1.1 2.2 2.8 2.9 IRR (%) Pre-tax IRR 16.4 25.9 30.4 31.1 After-tax IRR 14.0 22.0 25.8 26.4 Payback period (years) Pre-tax payback period 4.7 3.0 2.6 2.5 After-tax payback Period 4.8 3.1 2.7 2.6

Highlights

  • Initial gold production targeted for 2017
  • First five years – average annual gold production of 569,000 ounces at total cash costs(1) per ounce sold, net of by product

sales, of $467 per ounce

  • Life-of-mine gold and silver production, inclusive of low grade stockpile, of 6.2 and 18.6 million ounces from the Indicated

category and 1.8 and 13.5 million ounces from the Inferred category, respectively – $1.00 per ounce change in silver price assumption equates to ~$4 per ounce change in total cash costs(1)

Note:

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.

Blackwater expected to generate solid economic returns in current capital cost environment, even when using a long-term gold price assumption of US$1,275 per ounce

Base Case Spot Case

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 11

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000

  • 100

200 300 400 500 600 700 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total cash costs ($/oz) Production (thousand ounces) Gold production Base Case cash costs

Production and total cash costs(1)

Average First 5 Years 569,000 ounces gold at $467 per ounce(1)

Note:

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.

Average First 15 Years 507,000 ounces gold at $536 per ounce(1)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 12

  • Blackwater development capital

cost of $1.8 billion inclusive of 24%,

  • r $346 million, contingency

– $227 per recoverable ounce

  • Costed in mid-2012 capital

environment assuming parity foreign exchange rate

  • Capital intensity may be abating
  • Large diversified companies,

accounting for ~55% of global capital, delaying certain projects

  • Oil sands project expansions also

being delayed

Perspectives on capital costs

After-tax IRR (%)(1)(2)

$1.8 $1.7 $1.6 $1.5 $1,275 $1,600 $1,775 18.1% 27.5% 31.8% 16.6% 25.4% 29.6% 15.2% 23.6% 27.6% 14.0% 22.0% 25.8%

Gold price ($/oz) Development capital ($ billions)

New Gold could benefit from announced delays in capital projects of major companies

$1,800 32.5% 30.2% 28.2% 26.4%

Note:

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.
  • 2. IRR calculated to beginning of construction period in 2015.
  • Each $100 million change in development capital equates

to a ~$100 million change in NPV

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 13

Total ($mm) $ Per Ounce(2) Total Acquisition costs to date $602 $75 Development capital $1,814 $227 Life-of-mine sustaining capital $537 $67 Life-of-mine average cash costs ($/oz)(3) $543 Total acquisition cost ($/oz) $912 Spot gold price ($/oz) $1,775 (Discount)/Premium to spot gold (49%) Break-even gold price $912

Total acquisition cost (“TAC”)

  • Acquisition costs of $602(1) million

based on: – Richfield - $470 million – Silver Quest - $114 million – Geo Minerals - $18 million

  • Total acquisition cost of $912 per
  • unce below recent industry

comparable transactions – Further potential to decrease break-even gold price with continued resource expansion Total Acquisition Cost per Ounce

Notes:

  • 1. Per 2011 Annual financial statements.
  • 2. Per ounce calculations based on 6.2 million ounces from the Indicated category and 1.8 million ounces from the Inferred category.
  • 3. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 14

PEA Review

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 15

Blackwater Project – South Central British Columbia

British Columbia, Canada New Afton Blackwater

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 16

Blackwater Project – South Central British Columbia

Power Line

Power Line

Railway

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 17

Blackwater – South Central British Columbia

~160km to Prince George ~112km to Vanderhoof

Blackwater Project

50km 80km

Capoose Resource Current resource grid

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 18

Blackwater Project – South Central British Columbia

Summer 2012

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 19

  • Start of production in 2017
  • Conventional truck and shovel open pit mine with 60,000 tonnes per day processing plant
  • Life-of-mine strip ratio of 2.36 to 1
  • Low grade stockpiling strategy
  • Simple, conventional flowsheet using whole ore leach process
  • Life-of-mine gold and silver recoveries of 87% and 53%, respectively
  • Conventional waste rock and Tailings Storage Facility
  • Power supply from the hydroelectric power grid, via 133 kilometre transmission line
  • Minimal off-site infrastructure required

– Good existing access road; water supply within 15 kilometres

  • Low environmental risk and facility designed for closure

Blackwater Project overview

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 20

Site overview

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 21

PEA resource summary

  • The deposit contains an Indicated mineral resource of 267 Mt at 0.88 g/t Au and 4.3 g/t Ag and an Inferred

mineral resource of 121 Mt at 0.69 g/t Au and 7.3 g/t Ag at a base case lower cut-off of 0.30 gram per tonne gold equivalent

  • Mineral estimate is CIM 2010 compliant and prepared under Canadian National Instrument 43-101

– Based upon geologic block model that incorporated over 147,282 individual assays from 168,709 metres of diamond drill core in 449 drill holes – Average drill hole spacing of approximately 50 metres is sufficient to support mineral resource estimation up to the Indicated category

  • Mineral resource includes drill data received through May 14, 2012

Notes:

  • 1. Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of July 27, 2012 and was prepared by Ronald G. Simpson, P Geo.
  • 2. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
  • 3. Mineral Resources are amenable to open pit mining methods as defined by a Lerchs-Grossmann optimized pit simulation.
  • 4. The Lerchs-Grossmann optimized pit is based on assumptions that include US$/CDN$ parity foreign exchange rate, 83.6% Au recovery, 44.9% Ag recovery,

$1.52/tonne mining cost, $1.90/tonne waste mining cost, $10.52/tonne process and G&A cost. No allowances have been made for mining losses and dilution. The average pit slope angle is assumed to be 40°.

  • 5. The base case gold equivalent (AuEq) cut-off (bolded) is greater than the conceptual marginal cut-off of 0.23 g/t.
  • 6. AuEq = $24/oz Ag x 44.9% / $1,300/oz x 83.6%.
  • 7. Gold analyses are performed by fire assay/AA finish methods and silver analyses are performed by Induction Coupled Plasmaspectrometry (ICP). Silver ICP

analyses are not known with the same precision and do not have the same quality control support as gold fire assay analyses.

  • 8. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines has been used, and totals may not sum.

AuEq Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes (Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) Au (Moz) Ag (Moz) AuEq Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes (Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) Au (Moz) Ag (Moz) 0.25 280.4 0.85 4.2 7.64 37.9 0.25 128.6 0.66 7.0 2.72 28.9 0.30 267.1 0.88 4.3 7.52 36.9 0.30 120.5 0.69 7.3 2.66 28.3 0.40 230.6 0.96 4.6 7.14 34.1 0.40 98.9 0.77 7.8 2.45 24.8 Blackwater Project PEA Mineral Resource Estimate Indicated Mineral Resource Inferred Mineral Resource

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 22

  • Mineral resources have been constrained using a Lerchs-Grossman optimized pit using ordinary kriging

– Pit slope – 40 degrees

  • Mineral resource is grade shell contained estimate

– Resource samples were capped at 40 g/t gold and 150 g/t silver

  • Mine production schedule incorporates an elevated cut-off grade strategy during the first five years to raise

the mill feed grade

  • Block model was created in Gemcom-Surpac Vision software using a block size with dimensions of 10m x

10m x 10m

PEA base case assumptions

Gold price (US$/oz) $1,275 Silver price (US$/oz) $22.50 Foreign exchange rate CAD$1.00 = US$0.94 Diesel price ($/L) $0.98 Average electricity rate (kWh) C$0.044 Capital contingency 24% or $346 million NPV calculation Calculated to 2015 (construction start)

  • PEA commodity prices represent a

significant discount to current spot prices: – Gold: ~$500 per ounce (~28%) below current gold price – Silver: ~$12 per ounce (~35%) below current silver price

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 23

Project Development Capital Costs Description Cost ($ million) Direct Costs Mining & Pre-production Development $208 On Site Infrastructure $181 Process $539 Tailing and Water Reclaim $74 Infrastructure (Power, Water, Road) $85 Total Direct Costs $1,087 Owner's and Indirect Costs Owner's Costs $54 EPCM $112 Other Indirects $215 Total Owner's and Indirect Costs $381 Subtotal $1,468 Contingency (24%) $346 Total Project $1,814

  • Project is located 112 kilometres southwest

from Vanderhoof and has access to low cost hydroelectric power

  • Development capital estimate of $1.8 billion is

inclusive of a 24% or $346 million contingency

  • Development capital estimated based on the

current cost environment – A parity foreign exchange rate was assumed and the capital estimate was held constant in the economic analysis

  • Sustaining capital of $537 million, reclamation

and closure costs of $95 million and $72 million in equipment salvage value

Blackwater PEA costs - Capital

Total development and sustaining capital estimated at $294 per recoverable gold ounce

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 24

Project Operating Costs Area Unit Cost (C$/t milled) $ per gold ounce produced Mining $6.21 $259 Processing $7.59 $317 General and Administrative $0.95 $40 Royalty (0.6%) $0.18 $8 Refining $0.23 $9 Silver by-product sales at $22.50 per ounce silver ($2.16) ($90) Total cash costs(1) net of by-product sales $13.01 $543

44% 24% 17% 8% 6% 1% Reagents Grinding Media/liners Electricity Labour Maint materials Water Supply 59% 11% 9% 6% 4% 4% 4%2% Hauling Auxiliary Blasting G&A Drilling Loading General Maint. General Mine

Blackwater PEA costs - Operating

Processing Costs Mining Costs

Blackwater’s location near infrastructure, low stripping ratio, access to low cost power and silver by-product revenue expected to result in the Project having well below industry average cash costs

Note:

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.

Total Cash Costs(1) Schedule Production Years $ per gold ounce produced Years 1 through 5 $467 Years 1 through 15 $536 Years 16 through 17 $678 Life-of-mine $543

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 25

Production and cash costs profile

Years 1 through 5 Gold production – 569koz Total cash costs - $467/oz Years 1 through 15 Gold production – 507koz Total cash costs - $536/oz Years 16 through 17 Gold production – 296koz Total cash costs - $678/oz Life-of-mine Gold production – 489koz Total cash costs - $543/oz

(1) Note:

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.
  • $250

$500 $750 $1,000

  • 100

200 300 400 500 600 700 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Total Cash Costs ($/oz) Gold production (thousand ounces) Gold production Base Case cash costs

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 26

$0 $150 $300 $450 $600 $750 $900 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Operating cash flow Base Case Spot Case

PEA highlights(1)

Operating cash flow ($ millions)

  • Average spot case

cash flow during first five years of ~$655 million

  • Cumulative spot case

cash flow during first five years of ~$3.3 billion

Note:

  • 1. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.

PEA Results Base Case Spot Case Gold Price (US$/oz) $1,275 $1,775 Silver Price (US$/oz) $22.50 $34.50 US$/CDN$ Foreign Exchange 0.94 1.00 After-tax NPV(5%) ($ billions) $1.1 $2.8 After-tax IRR 14.0% 25.8% After-tax payback period (years) 4.8 2.7

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 27

Areas of optimization

Potential for expansion of the resource to the north and to depth Further geotechnical drilling to assess the possibility of steepening pit slopes Potential to reduce mining costs through mine plan optimization Optimizing process flowsheet

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 28

Next Steps

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 29

Environment and permitting

Preparations have started for environmental assessment and permitting approval process Agreements are in place with key First Nations Environmental assessment approval anticipated for second half of 2014 The site has no significant environmental constraints Building on strong community and First Nations relations as demonstrated at New Afton

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 30

Development activity First Nations & Public Consultation Preliminary Economic Assessment Base Line Environmental Studies Feasibility Study Engineering Procurement Production Target Drilling Project Description/Terms of Reference Environmental Assessment Reports Provincial Approval Federal Approval Construction H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

  • Remains unchanged from mid-2011

Project timeline

Note:

  • 1. Indicative timeline is dependent on continued exploration success, permit approvals and the determination that the deposit is economically viable. There is no assurance this timeline will be achieved nor that

the deposit will ever reach the production stage.

Reflects critical path in timeline

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 31

Continued exploration

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 32

July 2012 – Updated mineral resource

Inferred Resource 121Mt at 0.69 g/t for 2.7 Moz Indicated Resource 267Mt at 0.88 g/t for 7.5 Moz

  • Based on 449 core holes totaling 147,282 meters drilled

from 2009 through May 14, 2012

  • ~30% step-out holes and ~70% infill holes
  • Majority of holes drilled to 400 meter depth

– Mineralization open at depth in some areas – System also remains open to north

  • Drilled an additional 100,363 metres in 377 holes since

mid-May cut-off

Notes:

  • 1. Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of July 27, 2012 and was prepared by Ronald G. Simpson, P Geo.
  • 2. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
  • 3. Mineral Resources are amenable to open pit mining methods as defined by a Lerchs-Grossmann optimized pit simulation.
  • 4. The Lerchs-Grossmann optimized pit is based on assumptions that include US$/CDN$ parity foreign exchange rate, 83.6% Au recovery, 44.9% Ag recovery,

$1.52/tonne mining cost, $1.90/tonne waste mining cost, $10.52/tonne process and G&A cost. No allowances have been made for mining losses and dilution. The average pit slope angle is assumed to be 40°.

  • 5. The base case gold equivalent (AuEq) cut-off (bolded) is greater than the conceptual marginal cut-off of 0.23 g/t.
  • 6. AuEq = $24/oz Ag x 44.9% / $1,300/oz x 83.6%.
  • 7. Gold analyses are performed by fire assay/AA finish methods and silver analyses are performed by Induction Coupled Plasmaspectrometry (ICP). Silver ICP

analyses are not known with the same precision and do not have the same quality control support as gold fire assay analyses.

  • 8. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines has been used, and totals may not sum.

AuEq Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes (Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) Au (Moz) Ag (Moz) AuEq Cut-off (g/t) Tonnes (Mt) Au (g/t) Ag (g/t) Au (Moz) Ag (Moz) 0.25 280.4 0.85 4.2 7.64 37.9 0.25 128.6 0.66 7.0 2.72 28.9 0.30 267.1 0.88 4.3 7.52 36.9 0.30 120.5 0.69 7.3 2.66 28.3 0.40 230.6 0.96 4.6 7.14 34.1 0.40 98.9 0.77 7.8 2.45 24.8 Blackwater Project PEA Mineral Resource Estimate Indicated Mineral Resource Inferred Mineral Resource

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 33

Sxn 5893,500N Sxn 375,000E

Blackwater PEA mineral resource

NW Silver Zone

SW Breccia Pipe

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 34

Blackwater exploration upside opportunities

Section 5893,500N Section 375,000E

Gold NW ‘Silver Zone’ SW Breccia Pipe

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 35

Blackwater exploration upside opportunities (cont’d)

Section 5893,500N Section 375,000E

Silver SW Breccia Pipe NW ‘Silver Zone’

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 36

Blackwater feasibility study drilling program

SW Breccia Pipe NW Silver Zone

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 37

Blackwater land position

Project Area – June to December 2011 Project Area – September 2012

Auro Property Capoose property Blackwater property

Blackwater Capoose

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 38

2012 exploration program

  • Delineate Blackwater resource to M&I level
  • BW area – Exploration / Condemnation drilling
  • Capoose area – Test potential to expand resource
  • Reconnaissance mapping and sampling – Planned on all

properties

Blackwater Capoose

Auro Property Capoose property Blackwater property MYAB Area

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 39

2012 exploration/condemnation program

2012 Progress

  • 58 holes totaling 23,639

metres YTD

  • Program ~50% complete
  • Favorable volcanics, alteration

and mineralization being intercepted northwest of Blackwater

  • Drilling northeast of

Blackwater pending 2013 Program

  • Complete remaining ~15,000

meters by end Q1’13

  • Follow up on areas of interest
  • Freeze and/or modify project

siting and infrastructure footprint by end Q3’13

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 40

Capoose exploration

  • Explored potential to expand resource laterally and at depth
  • Completed 22 holes totaling 10,894 metres
  • Significant mineralization intercepted south and below known resource
  • Known resource sits within larger footprint of favorable volcanic stratigraphy,

alteration and mineralization extending 1.5-2 kilometre north and south

1,800m 1,600m 1,400m 0.78 g/t Au, 4.4 g/t Ag 80m 0.24 g/t Au, 21.5 g/t Ag 25 m Assays pending 1,800m 1,600m 1,400m 0.77 g/t Au, 7.2 g/t Ag 78m 0.15 g/t Au, 24.4 g/t Ag 74m Assays pending Assays pending Sxn 5905,700N Sxn 5905,650N Capoose Resource GradeShell

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 41

2012 property wide reconnaissance

>1000 ppb Au 500-1000 ppb Au 250-500 ppb Au 50-250 ppb Au

Blackwater Capoose

  • Gold-in-till sampling over ~750 km2 area
  • Soil geochem sampling over ~237 line-km
  • Geologic reconnaissance mapping over 125 km2
slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 42

Conclusion

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 43

What Blackwater means to New Gold

World class asset in South Central BC Robust Project Experienced Management Team

New Afton Blackwater

 8 million recoverable gold ounces today  Well below industry average cash costs  Solid economics even with conservative gold price assumptions

  • Very few new discoveries of Blackwater’s

scale in North America/Mexico in last five years

  • Blackwater a new discovery in an

underexplored district with excellent infrastructure

  • New Gold teams who successfully delivered

Cerro San Pedro, Mesquite and New Afton further supplemented by former Mount Milligan permitting team

Continued Exploration Upside

  • Blackwater remains open, plus Capoose

and regional targets

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 44

Accretive resource growth

$602 million

Acquisition Cost

7.5Moz GOLD & 36.9Moz Silver

Blackwater accounts for 36% and 29% of New Gold’s consolidated gold and silver Measured & Indicated resources, respectively

~11% of current market capitalization

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 45

$0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250

  • 100

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Blackwater and New Afton Combined cash costs

Building presence in British Columbia

British Columbia Measured & Indicated Resources

Gold 9.3Moz Silver 42.4Moz Copper 1.6Blbs

British Columbia Gold Production and Total Cash Costs(1)(2)

Note:

  • 1. Blackwater production and cash costs based on PEA and New Afton production and cash costs based on latest Technical Report and New Gold assumptions.
  • 2. Refer to Cautionary Statement and note on Total cash costs and PEA additional cautionary note.

Gold production (thousand ounces) Combined cash costs ($/oz)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 46

Solid production profile

  • El Morro and Blackwater expected to more than double New Gold’s gold production by 2017

at low cost

387 405 - 445 ~450 - 500 200 400 600 800 1,000 2011A 2012E 2013E 2017E

Gold production (thousand ounces)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 47

  • $300

$600 $900 $1,200 2011A 2013E 2015E 2017E

Cash flow generation potential

Note:

  • 1. 2013E, 2015E and 2017E at spot commodity prices of $1,775/oz gold, $34.50/oz silver, $3.75/lb copper.

Operating Cash Flow ($ millions)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 48

2012 – A year of catalysts

Blackwater resource update New Afton production start El Morro litigation decision Further Blackwater PEA resource update New Afton commercial production Blackwater PEA New Afton mill achieving design capacity El Morro engineering/development planning Blackwater/New Afton exploration

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Blackwater PEA Investor/Analyst Breakfast | September 2012 49

The New Gold investment thesis

EXPERIENCED BOARD AND MANAGEMENT FULLY FUNDED COMPANY WITH STRONG BALANCE SHEET DIVERSIFIED ASSET BASE IN MINING FRIENDLY JURISDICTIONS ORGANIC GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES/METAL OPTIONALITY PRODUCTION GROWTH/MARGIN EXPANSION INCREASING UNDERLYING ASSET VALUE MULTIPLE CATALYSTS COMPELLING INVESTMENT PROPOSITION