Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals Sara Saeedi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals Sara Saeedi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Universit at Osnabr uck October 2015 Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani)

Universit¨ at Osnabr¨ uck

October 2015

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Binomial edge ideals

Let G be a finite simple graph with vertex set V (G) = {v1, . . . , vn} and edge set E(G). Associated to G is a binomial ideal JG = (fij : i < j, {vi, vj} ∈ E(G)), in S = k[x1, . . . , xn, y1, . . . , yn], called the binomial edge ideal of G, in which fij = xiyj − xjyi. It could be seen as the ideal generated by a collection of 2-minors

  • f a (2 × n)-matrix whose entries are all indeterminates.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Binomial edge ideals

Let G be a finite simple graph with vertex set V (G) = {v1, . . . , vn} and edge set E(G). Associated to G is a binomial ideal JG = (fij : i < j, {vi, vj} ∈ E(G)), in S = k[x1, . . . , xn, y1, . . . , yn], called the binomial edge ideal of G, in which fij = xiyj − xjyi. It could be seen as the ideal generated by a collection of 2-minors

  • f a (2 × n)-matrix whose entries are all indeterminates.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Reduced Gr¨

  • bner basis

By <, we mean the lexicographic order induced by x1 > · · · > xn > y1 > · · · > yn. Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

Let G be a graph. Then in<JG is a squarefree monomial ideal. In particular, JG is a radical ideal.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Minimal primes

Let G be a graph [n], and let G1, . . . , Gc(T) be the connected component of G[n]\T, the induced subgraph of G on [n] \ T. For each Gi we denote by Gi the complete graph on the vertex set V (Gi). For each subset T ⊂ [n] a prime ideal PT(G) is defined as PT(G) = (

  • i∈T

{xi, yi}, J

G1, . . . , J Gc(T)).

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Minimal primes

Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

Let G be a graph [n]. Then JG =

T⊂[n] PT (G).

Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

Let G be a graph [n]. Then PT(G) is a minimal prime ideal of JG if and only if T = ∅, or each i ∈ T is a cut point of the graph G([n]\T)∪{i}.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Minimal primes

Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

Let G be a graph [n]. Then JG =

T⊂[n] PT (G).

Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

Let G be a graph [n]. Then PT(G) is a minimal prime ideal of JG if and only if T = ∅, or each i ∈ T is a cut point of the graph G([n]\T)∪{i}. Corollary JG is a prime ideal if and only if all connected components of G are complete graphs.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Minimal primes

Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

Let G be a graph [n]. Then JG =

T⊂[n] PT (G).

Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

Let G be a graph [n]. Then PT(G) is a minimal prime ideal of JG if and only if T = ∅, or each i ∈ T is a cut point of the graph G([n]\T)∪{i}. Corollary JG is a prime ideal if and only if all connected components of G are complete graphs.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dimension

Corollary Let G be a graph [n]. Then heightPT(G) = |T| + (n − c(T)) and dimS/JG = max{(n − |T|) + c(T) : T ⊂ [n]}. In particular, dimS/JG ≥ n + c, where c is the number of connected components of G.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Closed graphs

Herzog - Hibi - Hreinsd´

  • ttir - Kahle - Rauh (2010)

The following conditions are equivalent: (1) The generators fij of JG form a quadratic Gr¨

  • bner basis.

(2) For all edges {i, j} and {k, l} with i < j and k < l one has {j, l} ∈ E(G) if i = k, and {i, k} ∈ E(G) if j = l.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Closed graphs

A graph G is said to be closed with respect to the given labeling of the vertices, if G satisfies conditions of previous theorem, and a graph G with vertex set V (G) = {v1, . . . , vn} is said to be closed, if its vertices can be labeled by the integer 1, 2, . . . , n such that for this labeling G is closed.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Closed graphs

1

v

3

v

2

v

4

v

5

v

C5 is not a closed graph.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Closed graphs

1

v

2

v

3

v

1

  • n

v

n

v

Pn is a closed graph.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Closed graphs

Ene - Herzog - Hibi (2010) The following conditions are equivalent: (1) G is closed. (2) There exists a labeling of G such that all facets of the clique complex of G are intervals.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Graded Betti numbers

Ene - Herzog - Hibi (2010) Let G be a closed graph with Cohen-Macaulay binomial edge ideal. Then βij(JG) = βij(in<(JG)) for all i, j. Conjecture (Ene - Herzog - Hibi (2010)) Let G be a closed graph. Then βij(JG) = βij(in<(JG)) for all i, j.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Graded Betti numbers

Ene - Herzog - Hibi (2010) Let G be a closed graph with Cohen-Macaulay binomial edge ideal. Then βij(JG) = βij(in<(JG)) for all i, j. Conjecture (Ene - Herzog - Hibi (2010)) Let G be a closed graph. Then βij(JG) = βij(in<(JG)) for all i, j.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Linear resolutions

Suppose I is a homogeneous ideal of R whose generators all have degree d. Then I has a linear resolution if for all i ≥ 0, βi,j(I) = 0 for all j = i + d.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Linear resolutions

Kiani - SM (2012) Let G be a graph with no isolated vertices. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (1) JG has a linear resolution. (2) JG is linearly presented. (3) in<(JG) has a linear resolution. (4) G is a complete graph.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pure resolutions

Let I be a homogeneous ideal of S whose generators all have degree d. Then I has a d-pure resolution (or pure resolution) if its minimal graded free resolution is of the form 0 → S(−dp)βp(I) → · · · → S(−d1)β1(I) → I → 0, where d = d1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pure resolutions

Schenzel - Zafar (2014) If G is a complete bipartite graph, then JG has a pure resolution.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Pure resolutions

Kiani - SM (2014) Let G be a graph with no isolated vertices. Then JG has a pure resolution if and only if G is a : (1) complete graph, or (2) complete bipartite graph, or (3) disjoint union of some paths.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Regularity

Matsuda - Murai (2013) Let G be a graph on [n], and let ℓ be the length of the longest induced path in G. Then reg(JG) ≥ ℓ + 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Regularity

Denoted c(G) we mean the number of maximal cliques of G. Kiani - SM (2012) Let G be a closed graph. Then reg(JG ) ≤ c(G) + 1. Conjecture (Kiani - SM (2012)) Let G be a graph. Then reg(JG ) ≤ c(G) + 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Regularity

Denoted c(G) we mean the number of maximal cliques of G. Kiani - SM (2012) Let G be a closed graph. Then reg(JG ) ≤ c(G) + 1. Conjecture (Kiani - SM (2012)) Let G be a graph. Then reg(JG ) ≤ c(G) + 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Regularity

Ene - Zarojanu (2014) Let G be a block graph. Then reg(JG) ≤ c(G) + 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Regularity

Ene - Zarojanu (2014) Let G be a closed graph with connected components G1, . . . , Gr. Then reg(JG) = reg(in<(JG)) = ℓ1 + · · · + ℓr + 1, where ℓi is the length of the longest induced path of Gi.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Regularity

Kiani - SM (2015) Let G1 and G2 be graphs on [n1] and [n2], respectively, not both

  • complete. Then

reg(JG1∗G2) = max{reg(JG1), reg(JG2), 3}. Corollary Let G be a complete t-partite graph which is not complete. Then reg(JG) = 3.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Regularity

Kiani - SM (2015) Let G1 and G2 be graphs on [n1] and [n2], respectively, not both

  • complete. Then

reg(JG1∗G2) = max{reg(JG1), reg(JG2), 3}. Corollary Let G be a complete t-partite graph which is not complete. Then reg(JG) = 3. It was proved before for bipartite graphs by Schenzel and Zafar.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Regularity

Kiani - SM (2015) Let G1 and G2 be graphs on [n1] and [n2], respectively, not both

  • complete. Then

reg(JG1∗G2) = max{reg(JG1), reg(JG2), 3}. Corollary Let G be a complete t-partite graph which is not complete. Then reg(JG) = 3. It was proved before for bipartite graphs by Schenzel and Zafar.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Regularity

Matsuda - Murai (2013) Let G be a graph on n vertices. Then reg(JG) ≤ n. Conjecture (Matsuda - Murai (2013)) Let G = Pn be a graph on n vertices. Then reg(JG) ≤ n − 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Regularity

Matsuda - Murai (2013) Let G be a graph on n vertices. Then reg(JG) ≤ n. Conjecture (Matsuda - Murai (2013)) Let G = Pn be a graph on n vertices. Then reg(JG) ≤ n − 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Matsuda and Murai’s Conjecture

Zahid - Zafar (2013) Let Cn be an n-cycle. Then reg(JCn) = n − 1. Ene - Zarojanu (2014) Let G = Pn be a block graph on n vertices. Then reg(JG) ≤ n − 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Matsuda and Murai’s Conjecture

Zahid - Zafar (2013) Let Cn be an n-cycle. Then reg(JCn) = n − 1. Ene - Zarojanu (2014) Let G = Pn be a block graph on n vertices. Then reg(JG) ≤ n − 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Matsuda and Murai’s Conjecture

Kiani - SM (2015) Let G = Pn be a graph on n vertices. Then reg(JG) ≤ n − 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Matsuda and Murai’s Conjecture

Mohammadi - Sharifan (2014) Let G be a graph and e = {i, j} be an edge of G. Then JG\e : fe = J(G\e)e + IG, where IG = (gP,t : P : i, i1, . . . , is, j and 0 ≤ t ≤ s), gP,0 = xi1 · · · xis and gP,t = yi1 · · · yitxit+1 · · · xis for every 1 ≤ t ≤ s.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The linear strand

Let S = K[x1, . . . , xn] be the polynomial ring. We view S as a standard graded K-algebra by assigning to each xi the degree 1. A graded complex G : · · · → G2 → G1 → G0 → 0

  • f finitely generated graded free S-modules is called a linear

complex (with initial degree d) if for all i, Gi = S(−i − d)bi for suitable integers bi.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The linear strand

Let M be a finitely generated graded S-module, and let d be the initial degree of M, and let (F, ∂) be the minimal graded free resolution of M with Fi =

j S(−j)βi,j. Note that βij = 0 for all

pairs (i, j) with j < i + d. Let F lin

i

be the direct summand S(−i − d)βi,i+d of Fi. It is obvious that ∂(F lin

i

) ⊂ F lin

i−1 for all i > 0.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The linear strand

Let M be a finitely generated graded S-module, and let d be the initial degree of M, and let (F, ∂) be the minimal graded free resolution of M with Fi =

j S(−j)βi,j. Note that βij = 0 for all

pairs (i, j) with j < i + d. Let F lin

i

be the direct summand S(−i − d)βi,i+d of Fi. It is obvious that ∂(F lin

i

) ⊂ F lin

i−1 for all i > 0.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-39
SLIDE 39

The linear strand

Thus Flin : · · · → F lin

2

→ F lin

1

→ F lin → 0 is a subcomplex of F, called the linear strand of the resolution of M. Obviously, Flin is a linear complex.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The linear strand

Thus Flin : · · · → F lin

2

→ F lin

1

→ F lin → 0 is a subcomplex of F, called the linear strand of the resolution of M. Obviously, Flin is a linear complex.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-41
SLIDE 41

The linear strand

Denoted by (f0(∆), f1(∆), . . . , fd(∆)) is the f -vector of a d-dimensional simplicial complex ∆. Conjecture (Kiani - SM (2014)) Let G be a graph. Then βi,i+2(JG) = (i + 1)fi+1(∆(G)), where ∆(G) is the clique complex of G.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Determinantal facet ideal

A clutter C on the vertex set [n] is a collection of subsets of [n] with no containment between its elements. An element of C is called a circuit. If all circuits of C have the same cardinality m, then C is called an m-uniform clutter. A clique of an m-uniform clutter C is a subset σ of [n] such that each m-subset of σ is a circuit of C. We denote by ∆(C) the simplicial complex whose faces are the cliques of C which is called the clique complex of C.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Determinantal facet ideal

A clutter C on the vertex set [n] is a collection of subsets of [n] with no containment between its elements. An element of C is called a circuit. If all circuits of C have the same cardinality m, then C is called an m-uniform clutter. A clique of an m-uniform clutter C is a subset σ of [n] such that each m-subset of σ is a circuit of C. We denote by ∆(C) the simplicial complex whose faces are the cliques of C which is called the clique complex of C. An m-uniform clutter is called complete if its clique complex is a simplex.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Determinantal facet ideal

A clutter C on the vertex set [n] is a collection of subsets of [n] with no containment between its elements. An element of C is called a circuit. If all circuits of C have the same cardinality m, then C is called an m-uniform clutter. A clique of an m-uniform clutter C is a subset σ of [n] such that each m-subset of σ is a circuit of C. We denote by ∆(C) the simplicial complex whose faces are the cliques of C which is called the clique complex of C. An m-uniform clutter is called complete if its clique complex is a simplex.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Determinantal facet ideal

Let C be an m-uniform clutter on [n]. To each circuit τ ∈ C with τ = {j1, . . . , jm} and 1 ≤ j1 < j2 < · · · < jm ≤ n we assign the m-minor mτ of X = (xij) which is determined by the columns 1 ≤ j1 < j2 < · · · < jm ≤ n. Denoted by JC is the ideal in S = K[xij : 1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ j ≤ n] which is generated by the minors mτ with τ ∈ C. This ideal is called the determinantal facet ideal of C.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Determinantal facet ideal

Let C be an m-uniform clutter on [n]. To each circuit τ ∈ C with τ = {j1, . . . , jm} and 1 ≤ j1 < j2 < · · · < jm ≤ n we assign the m-minor mτ of X = (xij) which is determined by the columns 1 ≤ j1 < j2 < · · · < jm ≤ n. Denoted by JC is the ideal in S = K[xij : 1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ j ≤ n] which is generated by the minors mτ with τ ∈ C. This ideal is called the determinantal facet ideal of C. In the case that C is a 2-uniform clutter, C may be viewed as a graph G, and hence JC = JG.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Determinantal facet ideal

Let C be an m-uniform clutter on [n]. To each circuit τ ∈ C with τ = {j1, . . . , jm} and 1 ≤ j1 < j2 < · · · < jm ≤ n we assign the m-minor mτ of X = (xij) which is determined by the columns 1 ≤ j1 < j2 < · · · < jm ≤ n. Denoted by JC is the ideal in S = K[xij : 1 ≤ i ≤ m, 1 ≤ j ≤ n] which is generated by the minors mτ with τ ∈ C. This ideal is called the determinantal facet ideal of C. In the case that C is a 2-uniform clutter, C may be viewed as a graph G, and hence JC = JG.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-48
SLIDE 48

The linear strand

Herzog - Kiani - SM (2015) Let G be a finite linear complex with initial degree d. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (1) G is the linear strand of a finitely generated graded S-module with initial degree d. (2) Hi(G)i+d+j = 0 for all i > 0 and for j = 0, 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Eagon-Northcott complex

Let F and G be free S-modules of rank m and n, respectively, with m ≤ n, and let ϕ : G → F be an S-module homomorphism. We choose a basis f1, . . . , fm of F and a basis g1, . . . , gn of G. Let ϕ(gj) = m

i=1 αijfi for j = 1, . . . , n. The matrix α = (αij)

describing ϕ with respect to these bases is an (m × n)-matrix with entries in S.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Eagon-Northcott complex

Let F and G be free S-modules of rank m and n, respectively, with m ≤ n, and let ϕ : G → F be an S-module homomorphism. We choose a basis f1, . . . , fm of F and a basis g1, . . . , gn of G. Let ϕ(gj) = m

i=1 αijfi for j = 1, . . . , n. The matrix α = (αij)

describing ϕ with respect to these bases is an (m × n)-matrix with entries in S. The ideal of m-minors of this matrix is denoted Im(ϕ). It is know that if grade Im(ϕ) = n − m + 1, then the so-called Eagon-Northcott complex provides a free resolution of Im(ϕ).

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Eagon-Northcott complex

Let F and G be free S-modules of rank m and n, respectively, with m ≤ n, and let ϕ : G → F be an S-module homomorphism. We choose a basis f1, . . . , fm of F and a basis g1, . . . , gn of G. Let ϕ(gj) = m

i=1 αijfi for j = 1, . . . , n. The matrix α = (αij)

describing ϕ with respect to these bases is an (m × n)-matrix with entries in S. The ideal of m-minors of this matrix is denoted Im(ϕ). It is know that if grade Im(ϕ) = n − m + 1, then the so-called Eagon-Northcott complex provides a free resolution of Im(ϕ).

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Eagon-Northcott complex

Denote by S(F) is the symmetric algebra of F. The complex C(ϕ) : 0 →

n

  • G ⊗ Sn−m(F)∗ → · · · →

m

  • G ⊗ S0(F)∗ → 0,

is called the Eagon-Northcott complex.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Eagon-Northcott complex

We set Ci(ϕ) = m+i G ⊗ Si(F)∗ and b(σ; a) = gσ ⊗ f (a), where gσ = gj1 ∧ · · · ∧ gjm+i for σ = {j1 < j2 < · · · < jm+i}, and f (a) is the dual of f a = f a1

1 f a2 2 · · · f am m

with a ∈ Zm

≥0 and

|a| = a1 + · · · + am = i. Moreover, we set f (a) = 0 if ai < 0 for some i. Then the elements b(σ; a) form a basis of Ci(ϕ), and ∂(b(σ; a)) =

m+i

  • k=1

m

  • ℓ=1

(−1)k+1αℓjkb(σ \ {jk}; a − eℓ). Here e1, . . . , em is the canonical basis of Zm.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Eagon-Northcott complex

We set Ci(ϕ) = m+i G ⊗ Si(F)∗ and b(σ; a) = gσ ⊗ f (a), where gσ = gj1 ∧ · · · ∧ gjm+i for σ = {j1 < j2 < · · · < jm+i}, and f (a) is the dual of f a = f a1

1 f a2 2 · · · f am m

with a ∈ Zm

≥0 and

|a| = a1 + · · · + am = i. Moreover, we set f (a) = 0 if ai < 0 for some i. Then the elements b(σ; a) form a basis of Ci(ϕ), and ∂(b(σ; a)) =

m+i

  • k=1

m

  • ℓ=1

(−1)k+1αℓjkb(σ \ {jk}; a − eℓ). Here e1, . . . , em is the canonical basis of Zm.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Generalized Eagon-Northcott complex

Let ∆ be a simplicial complex on [n]. We denote Ci(∆; ϕ) the free submodule of Ci(ϕ) generated by all b(σ; a) such that σ ∈ ∆ with |σ| = m + i, and a ∈ Zm

≥0 with |a| = i.

Since ∂(b(σ; a)) ∈ Ci−1(∆; ϕ) for all b(σ; a) ∈ Ci(∆; ϕ), we obtain the subcomplex C(∆; ϕ) : 0 → Cn−m(∆; ϕ) → · · · → C1(∆; ϕ) → C0(∆; ϕ) → 0

  • f C(ϕ) which we call the generalized Eagon-Northcott complex

attached to the simplicial complex ∆ and the module homomorphism ϕ : G → F.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Generalized Eagon-Northcott complex

Let ∆ be a simplicial complex on [n]. We denote Ci(∆; ϕ) the free submodule of Ci(ϕ) generated by all b(σ; a) such that σ ∈ ∆ with |σ| = m + i, and a ∈ Zm

≥0 with |a| = i.

Since ∂(b(σ; a)) ∈ Ci−1(∆; ϕ) for all b(σ; a) ∈ Ci(∆; ϕ), we obtain the subcomplex C(∆; ϕ) : 0 → Cn−m(∆; ϕ) → · · · → C1(∆; ϕ) → C0(∆; ϕ) → 0

  • f C(ϕ) which we call the generalized Eagon-Northcott complex

attached to the simplicial complex ∆ and the module homomorphism ϕ : G → F.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Generalized Eagon-Northcott complex as a linear strand

Let X be an (m × n)-matrix of indeterminates xij, and let S be the polynomial ring over a field K in the variables xij. Moreover, let ϕ : G → F be the S-module homomorphism of free S-modules given by the matrix X. Now we give a (Zm × Zn)-grading to the polynomial ring S, by setting mdeg(xij) = (ei, εj) where ei is the i-th canonical basis vector of Zm and εj is the j-th canonical basis vector of Zn.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Generalized Eagon-Northcott complex as a linear strand

Let X be an (m × n)-matrix of indeterminates xij, and let S be the polynomial ring over a field K in the variables xij. Moreover, let ϕ : G → F be the S-module homomorphism of free S-modules given by the matrix X. Now we give a (Zm × Zn)-grading to the polynomial ring S, by setting mdeg(xij) = (ei, εj) where ei is the i-th canonical basis vector of Zm and εj is the j-th canonical basis vector of Zn.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Generalized Eagon-Northcott complex as a linear strand

The chain complex C(∆; ϕ) inherits this grading. More precisely, for each i, the degree of a basis element b(σ; a) of Ci(∆; ϕ) with σ = {j1, . . . , jm+i} is set to be (a + 1, γ) ∈ Zm × Zn, where γ = εj1 + · · · + εjm+i, and 1 is the vector in Zm whose entries are all equal to 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Generalized Eagon-Northcott complex as a linear strand

Herzog - Kiani - SM (2015) Let ∆ be a simplicial complex, and let m be a positive integer. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (1) C(∆; ϕ) is the linear strand of a finitely generated graded S-module with initial degree m. (2) ∆ has no minimal nonfaces of cardinality ≥ m + 2.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-61
SLIDE 61

The linear strand of JC

Herzog - Kiani - SM (2015) Let C be an m-uniform clutter, and let F be the minimal graded free resolution of JC. Then Flin ∼ = C(∆(C); ϕ).

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-62
SLIDE 62

The linear strand of JC

Corollary Let C be an m-uniform clutter. Then βi,i+m(JC) = m + i − 1 m − 1

  • fm+i−1(∆(C)),

for all i. Therefore, the length of the linear strand of JC is equal to dim ∆(C) − m + 1,

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-63
SLIDE 63

The linear strand of JC

Corollary Let C be an m-uniform clutter. Then βi,i+m(JC) = m + i − 1 m − 1

  • fm+i−1(∆(C)),

for all i. Therefore, the length of the linear strand of JC is equal to dim ∆(C) − m + 1, and in particular, projdim JC ≥ dim ∆(C) − m + 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-64
SLIDE 64

The linear strand of JC

Corollary Let C be an m-uniform clutter. Then βi,i+m(JC) = m + i − 1 m − 1

  • fm+i−1(∆(C)),

for all i. Therefore, the length of the linear strand of JC is equal to dim ∆(C) − m + 1, and in particular, projdim JC ≥ dim ∆(C) − m + 1.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Dterminantal facet ideals with linear resolution

Herzog - Kiani - SM (2015) Let C be an m-uniform clutter. Then the following conditions are equivalent: (1) JC has a linear resolution. (2) JC is linearly presented. (3) C is a complete clutter.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-66
SLIDE 66
  • V. Ene, J. Herzog, T. Hibi, Cohen-Macaulay binomial edge

ideals, Nagoya Math. J. 204 (2011), 57-68.

  • V. Ene, J. Herzog, T. Hibi, F. Mohammadi, Determinantal

facet ideals, Michigan Math. J. 62 (2013), 39-57.

  • V. Ene, A. Zarojanu, On the regularity of binomial edge

ideals., Math. Nachr. 288, No. 1 (2015), 19-24.

  • J. Herzog, T. Hibi, F. Hreinsdotir, T. Kahle, J. Rauh, Binomial

edge ideals and conditional independence statements, Adv.

  • Appl. Math. 45 (2010), 317-333.
  • J. Herzog, D. Kiani, S. Saeedi Madani, The linear strand of

determinantal facet ideals, (arXiv:1508.07592).

  • D. Kiani, S. Saeedi Madani, Binomial edge ideals with pure
  • resolutions. Collect. Math. 65 (2014), 331-340.
  • D. Kiani, S. Saeedi Madani, The Castelnuovo-Mumford

regularity of binomial edge ideals, (arXiv:1504.01403).

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-67
SLIDE 67
  • K. Matsuda, S. Murai, Regularity bounds for binomial edge

ideals, J. Commut. Algebra. 5(1) (2013), 141-149.

  • F. Mohammadi and L. Sharifan, Hilbert function of binomial

edge ideals, Comm. Algebra 42 (2014), 688-703.

  • M. Ohtani, Graphs and ideals generated by some 2-minors,
  • Comm. Algebra. 39 (2011), 905-917.
  • S. Saeedi Madani, D. Kiani, Binomial edge ideals of graphs.
  • Electron. J. Combin. 19(2) (2012), ♯ P44.
  • S. Saeedi Madani, D. Kiani, On the binomial edge ideal of a

pair of graphs. Electron. J. Combin. 20(1) (2013), ♯ P48.

  • P. Schenzel, S. Zafar, Algebraic properties of the binomial

edge ideal of a complete bipartite graph, An. St. Univ. Ovidius Constanta, Ser. Mat. 22(2) (2014), 217-237.

  • Z. Zahid, S. Zafar, On the Betti numbers of some classes of

binomial edge ideals, Electron. J. Combin. 20(4) (2013), ♯ P37.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Thanks for your attention.

Sara Saeedi Madani (joint with J. Herzog and D. Kiani) Binomial edge ideals and determinantal facet ideals