5 31 2013
play

5/31/2013 Disclosures Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: Evidence I have - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

5/31/2013 Disclosures Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: Evidence I have nothing to disclose David J. Lee, MD Professor Pain Management Center Department of Anesthesia Facet Joint Pain Facet Joint Pain Prevalence 60% with degenerative changes by


  1. 5/31/2013 Disclosures Lumbar Facet Joint Pain: Evidence I have nothing to disclose David J. Lee, MD Professor Pain Management Center Department of Anesthesia Facet Joint Pain Facet Joint Pain Prevalence � 60% with degenerative changes by age 30 � Spinal pain 54-80% lifetime � Clinical history, physical exam and diagnostic imagings 80-90% resolve in 6 weeks are unreliable for facet joint pain and can not reliably 5-10% persistent predict response to diagnostic facet injections 25-75% recurrent and persistent � There is no tissue diagnosis to confirm facet joint pain 60% multiple regions � Facet joint pain 54-67% chronic cervical pain 42-48% chronic thoracic pain 15-45% chronic lumbar pain 1

  2. 5/31/2013 Diagnostic Block Lumbar Facet Joint Pain Validity of comparative local anesthetic blocks confirmed with placebo controlled diagnostic blocks � Diagnostic block (single vs comparative) � Comparative local anesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of � Therapeutic intervention (intra-articular injection vs cervical zygapophysial joints pain medial branch block vs radiofrequency ablation) Barnsley et al 1993 Pain � Repeat radiofrequency ablation � The utility of comparative local anesthetic blocks versus � Spinal fusion placebo controlled blocks for the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joint pain Lord et al 1995 Clin J Pain Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N: Comparative local anesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joints pain. Pain 1993; 55:99-106 Lord SM, Barnsley L, Bogduk N: The utility of comparative local anesthetic blocks versus placebo-controlled blocks for the diagnosis of cervical zygopophysial joint pain. Clin J Pain 1995: 11:208-13 Diagnostic Block Diagnostic Block � Retrospective review � 438 patients � False positive rate: high � Comparative local anesthetic blocks placebo (18-32%) � Outcome: >=80% pain relief and ability to perform sedation painful movement liberal superficial local anesthetic � Multiple regions: 38% spread of injectate Patient Single Double Prevalence False Positive Bilateral � False negative rate:11% Cervical 251 175 97 39% 45% 72% Thoracic 65 38 22 34% 42% 80% Lumbar 303 150 83 27% 45% 79% Hogan QH, Abram SE: Neural blockade for diagnosis and prognosis: a review. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:216-41 Manchukonda R, et al: Facet joint pain in chronic spinal pain: an evaluation of prevalence Kaplan M, et al: The ability of lumbar medial branch blocks to anesthetize and false-positive rate of diagnostic blocks. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20:539-45 the zygapophysial joint: a physiologic challenge. Spine 1998; 23:1847-52 2

  3. 5/31/2013 Diagnostic Block Lumbar Facet Joint Pain � Review of literature � 10/2004 to 12/2006 � Diagnostic block (single vs comparative) (2) � Comparative local anesthetic blocks � Therapeutic intervention (intra-articular injection vs medial branch block vs radiofrequency ablation) � Outcome: >50% pain relief � Cervical: strong/II � Repeat radiofrequency ablation � Thoracic: moderate/III � Spinal fusion � Lumbar: strong/II � Intra-articular injections vs medial branch blocks Sehgal N, et al: Systematic review of diagnostic utility of facet (zygapophysial) joint injections in chronic spinal pain: an update. Pain Physician 2007; 10:213-28 Marks RC, Houston T, Thulbourne T: Facet joint injection and facet nerve block: a randomized comparison in 86 patients with chornic low back pain. Pain 1992; 49:325-8 Diagnostic Block Diagnostic Block � Review of literature � Level of evidence: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) � 1966 to 6/2012 � Lumbar medial branch blocks Evidence � Single or comparative local anesthetic blocks Single block, 50-74% relief (1) Poor � Outcome: 50-74% or 75-100% pain relief and ability to Single block, 75-100% relief (4) Limited perform painful movement Comparative blocks, 50-74% relief (5) Fair Comparative blocks, 75-100% relief (13) Good Falco F, et al: An update of the systematic assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar Falco F, et al: An update of the systematic assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks. Pain Physician 2012; 15:869-907 facet joint nerve blocks. Pain Physician 2012; 15:869-907 3

  4. 5/31/2013 Level of Evidence Diagnostic Block � Retrospective � 262 patients Adapted and modified from methods developed by U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) � Single local anesthetic block � Outcome: >=50% pain relief after radiofrequency ablation Definition Grade persisting >=6 months and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) Evidence includes at least 2 consistent, higher quality RCTs or studies of diagnostic test accuracy. Good � Degree of pain relief from medial branch blocks does not Evidence is includes at least 1 higher quality RCT or study of diagnostic test accuracy. Fair correlate with outcome from radiofrequency ablation Limited Evidence is insufficient to assess effects on health outcome. or Poor � Not to be extrapolated to controlled or comparative local anesthetic blocks Patients Pain Relief GPE >=50%<80% 145 52% 67% >=80% 117 56% 66% Cohen S, et al: Lumbar zygapophysial (facet) joint radiofrequency denervation success as a function of pain relief during diagnostic medial branch blocks: a multicenter analysis. The Spine Journal 2008; 8;498-504 Diagnostic Block Lumbar Facet Joint Pain � Strong evidence for diagnostic accuracy � Diagnostic block (single vs comparative) � No consensus � Therapeutic intervention (intra-articular injection vs Intra-articular injection vs medial branch block medial branch block vs radiofrequency ablation) (4) >=50% vs >=80% � Repeat radiofrequency ablation � Comparative blocks: decrease false positive rate, increase � Spinal fusion false negative rate 4

  5. 5/31/2013 Therapeutic Intervention Therapeutic Intervention � Level of evidence: Manchikanti et al � Review of literature � 11/2004 to 12/2006 Evidence Evidence � Outcome: pain relief, functional improvement, Short Term Long Term psychological status, and return to work Cervical Intra-articular (1) Limited IV IV MBB (1) Moderate III III � Intra-articular injections and medial branch blocks RFA (1) Moderate III III Short term: <6 weeks Thoracic MBB Moderate III III Long term: >=6 weeks RFA Indeterminate V V � Radiofrequency ablation Lumbar Intra-articular (2) Moderate III III Short term: <3 months MBB (2) Moderate III III Long term: >=3 months RFA (1) Moderate III III Boswell M, et al: A systematic review of therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic Boswell M, et al: A systematic review of therapeutic facet joint interventions in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10:229-53 spinal pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10:229-53 Level of Evidence Therapeutic Intervention � Review of literature � 1966 to 12/2008 Conclusive: Research-based evidence with multiple relevant and high-quality scientific studies or Level I consistent reviews of meta-analyses � Diagnostic with controlled local anesthetic blocks Strong: Research-based evidence from at least 1 properly designed randomized, controlled trial; or Level II research-based evidence from multiple properly designed studies of smaller size; or multiple low quality Outcome: >=80% pain relief and ability to perform trials Moderate: painful activities a) Evidence obtained from well-designed pseudorandomized controlled trials (alternate allocation or some other method); � Therapeutic facet intra-articular injections, MBBs and RFA Level III b) Evidence obtained from comparative studies with concurrent controls and allocation not randomized (cohort studies, case-controlled studies, or interrupted time series with a control group); Primary outcome: pain relief and long-term follow up c) Evidence obtained from comparative studies with historical control, 2 or more single-arm studies, or interrupted time series without a parallel control group Secondary outcome: Limited: Evidence from well-designed nonexperimental studies from more than 1 center or research group; Level IV or conflicting evidence with inconsistent findings in multiple trials improved functional status, psychological Level V Indeterminate: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical evidence, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees status, return to work, and reduction in opioids Manchikanti, et al: Methods for evidence synthesis in interventional pain management. Pain Physician 2003; 6:89-111 Datta S; et al: Systematic assessment of diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic utility of lumbar facet joint interventions. Pain Physician 2009; 12:437-60 5

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend