bemuse phase ii bemuse phase ii comparison and analysis
play

BEMUSE PHASE II: BEMUSE PHASE II: COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 01, 2023 •580 likes •1.13k views

DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA MECCANICA, NUCLEARE E DELLA PRODUZIONE - UNIVERSITA' DI PISA 56100 PISA - ITALY BEMUSE PHASE II: BEMUSE PHASE II: COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE RESULTS REV. 1 REV. 1 A.

  1. DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA MECCANICA, NUCLEARE E DELLA PRODUZIONE - UNIVERSITA' DI PISA 56100 PISA - ITALY BEMUSE PHASE II: BEMUSE PHASE II: COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF THE RESULTS REV. 1 REV. 1 A. Petruzzi, F. D’Auria Workshop on Evaluation of Uncertainties In Relation To Severe Accidents and Level 2 Probabilistic Safety Analysis November 7 – 9, 2005 – Aix-En-Provence, (FRANCE)

  2. FOREWORD FOREWORD BEMUSE: OECD/NEA/CSNI PROJECT (02- -07) 07) BEMUSE: OECD/NEA/CSNI PROJECT (02 PHASE I (completed) THIS PRESENTATION DESCRIPTION OF UNCERTAINTY METHODS PHASE II (completed, report to be approved) KEY RESULTS LOFT ISP 13 (test L2-5) REVISIT & SENSITIVITY STUDY PHASE III (activity completed, report to be issued) UNCERTAINTY METHOD APPLICATION TO TEST L2-5 PHASES IV AND V (started, to be endorsed by CSNI) UNCERTAINTY METHOD APPLICATION TO ZION W NPP LBLOCA

  3. CONTENTS CONTENTS � NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION � Nodalization Tables ( Template N° 1, Pag. 1 ) � Pressures Vs Length Curve ( New Request to the Participants ) � QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION � Resulting Time Sequence of Events ( Template N° 1, Pag. 1 ) � Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments ( T. #1 ) � Relevant Thermalhydraulic Aspects (RTA) Tables ( Template N° 2, Pag. 1 ) � QUANTITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION � Application of the FFTBM � USER’S EFFECT � SENSITIVITY STUDY ( Template N° 3 ) 2/50 �

  4. PARTICIPANT ORGANIZATIONS TO PHASE II PARTICIPANT ORGANIZATIONS TO PHASE II Code Resources 14 Participating Organizations; 7 TH System Codes 3/50

  5. 4/50 NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION Part B Part A

  6. 5/50 NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION Development Nodalization Part A:

  7. 6/50 NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION Steady State Part B: Level

  8. NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION Results of the Nodalization Qualification � Q A and Q B should be less than 1. 7/50

  9. NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION Results of the Nodalization Qualification 1.20 1.443 Qa Qb 1.00 Global Acceptability Factors 0.80 0.745 0.692 0.662 0.591 0.586 0.60 0.540 0.526 0.481 0.477 0.450 0.40 0.329 0.301 0.273 0.163 0.191 0.20 0.154 0.084 0.066 0.052 0.024 0.021 0.006 0.000 0.011 0.000 0.006 0.002 0.00 CEA [C25] IRSN [C25] NRI-2 [A20] GRS [A12] KFKI [A20] UPI [R5] NRI-1 [R5] UPC [R5] KINS [R5] TAEK [R5] PSI [TR4] EDO [T97] JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] Organization's Name 8/50

  10. NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION NODALIZATION QUALIFICATION Pressures – Length Curve CEA [C25] (14.916 MPa) EDOGIDRO [T97] (14.963 MPa) GRS [A12] (14.940 MPa) 1.008 IRSN [C25] (14.974 MPa) JNES [TM55] (14.948 MPa) KAERI [M23] (14.940 MPa) KFKI [A20] (15.093 MPa) KINS [R5] (14.924 MPa) NRI-1 [R5] (14.967 MPa) NRI-2 [A20] (14.967 MPa) PSI [TR4] (14.951 MPa) TAEK [R5] (14.968 MPa) 1.006 UPC [R5] (14.960 MPa) UPI [R5] (15.020 MPa) Experimental PUMP OUT CL OUT 1.004 Normalized Pressure (-) 1.002 LP BAF HL OUT HL IN CL IN LOOP SEAL TAF SG OUT 1.000 UT TOP HL IN 0.998 SG IN 0.996 PUMP IN OUT SG NOZZLE 0.994 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Loop Length (m) 9/50

  11. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Resulting Time sequence of Events - 1 120.0 Maximum cladding temperature reached LPIS injection terminated 100.0 CEA [C25] Time After Experiment Initiation (s) EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 80.0 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] 60.0 KFKI [A20] KINS [R5] NRI-1 [R5] Core cladding fully quenched 40.0 NRI-2 [A20] Accumulator emptied PSI [TR4] TAEK [R5] 20.0 UPC [R5] UPI [R5] Experimental 0.0 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 Time (s) 10/50

  12. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Resulting Time sequence of Events - 2 Partial top-down rewet CEA [C25] Pressurizer emptied 25.0 EDOGIDRO [T97] initiated GRS [A12] IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] 20.0 Time After Experiment Initiation (s) KAERI [M23] KFKI [A20] KINS [R5] NRI-1 [R5] 15.0 NRI-2 [A20] PSI [TR4] TAEK [R5] 10.0 UPC [R5] Partial top-down rewet ended Accumulator A injection initiated UPI [R5] Experimental 5.0 Subcooled break flow ended in cold leg 0.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Time (s) 11/50

  13. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Resulting Time sequence of Events - 3 1.4 Subcooled blowdown ended CEA [C25] EDOGIDRO [T97] 1.2 GRS [A12] IRSN [C25] Time After Experiment Initiation (s) 1.0 JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] KFKI [A20] 0.8 KINS [R5] NRI-1 [R5] Reactor scrammed NRI-2 [A20] 0.6 PSI [TR4] TAEK [R5] UPC [R5] 0.4 UPI [R5] Experimental 0.2 DNB 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Time (s) 12/50

  14. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments INTACT LOOP PRESSURE IN HOT LEG CEA [C25] 16.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 14.00 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] 12.00 KAERI [M23] KFKI [A20] Pressure (MPa) 10.00 KINS [R5] NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] 8.00 PSI [TR4] TAEK [R5] 6.00 UPC [R5] UPI [R5] 4.00 EXP: PE-PC-002 2.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 13/50

  15. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments SG PRESSURE - SECONDARY SIDE CEA [C25] 7.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] IRSN [C25] 6.50 JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] KFKI [A20] Pressure (MPa) KINS [R5] 6.00 NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] PSI [TR4] 5.50 TAEK [R5] UPC [R5] UPI [R5] EXP: PE-SGS-001 5.00 4.50 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 14/50

  16. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments ACCUMULATOR "A" PRESSURE CEA [C25] 5.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 4.50 IRSN [C25] 4.00 JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] 3.50 KFKI [A20] Pressure (MPa) KINS [R5] 3.00 NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] 2.50 PSI [TR4] 2.00 TAEK [R5] UPC [R5] 1.50 UPI [R5] EXP: PT-P120-043 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 15/50

  17. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgements PRESSURIZER PRESSURE CEA [C25] 16.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 14.00 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] 12.00 KAERI [M23] KFKI [A20] Pressure (MPa) 10.00 KINS [R5] NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] 8.00 PSI [TR4] TAEK [R5] 6.00 UPC [R5] UPI [R5] 4.00 EXP: PT-P139-05-1 2.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 16/50

  18. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgements CORE INLET FLUID TEMPERATURE CEA [C25] 650.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 600.00 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] 550.00 KFKI [A20] Temperature (K) KINS [R5] 500.00 NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] PSI [TR4] 450.00 TAEK [R5] UPC [R5] 400.00 UPI [R5] EXP: TE-3LP-001 350.00 300.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 17/50

  19. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgements CORE OUTLET FLUID TEMPERATURE CEA [C25] 650.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 600.00 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] 550.00 KFKI [A20] Temperature (K) KINS [R5] 500.00 NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] PSI [TR4] 450.00 TAEK [R5] UPC [R5] UPI [R5] 400.00 EXP: TE-5UP-003 350.00 300.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 18/50

  20. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments BREAK FLOW RATE IN COLD LEG CEA [C25] 800.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 700.00 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] 600.00 KAERI [M23] KFKI [A20] 500.00 Flow Rate (Kg/s) KINS [R5] 400.00 NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] 300.00 PSI [TR4] TAEK [R5] 200.00 UPC [R5] UPI [R5] 100.00 EXP: FR-BL-001 0.00 -100.00 -200.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 19/50

  21. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments BREAK FLOW RATE IN HOT LEG CEA [C25] 700.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 600.00 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] 500.00 KAERI [M23] KFKI [A20] 400.00 Flow Rate (Kg/s) KINS [R5] NRI-1 [R5] 300.00 NRI-2 [A20] PSI [TR4] 200.00 TAEK [R5] UPC [R5] 100.00 UPI [R5] EXP: FR-BL-002 0.00 -100.00 -200.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 20/50

  22. QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION QUALITATIVE ACCURACY EVALUATION Experimental Time Trends Comparisons – Qualitative Judgments ECCS INTEGRAL FLOW RATE CEA [C25] 3500.00 EDOGIDRO [T97] GRS [A12] 3000.00 IRSN [C25] JNES [TM55] KAERI [M23] 2500.00 KFKI [A20] KINS [R5] Mass (Kg) 2000.00 NRI-1 [R5] NRI-2 [A20] PSI [TR4] 1500.00 TAEK [R5] UPC [R5] 1000.00 UPI [R5] EXP: Derived-ECCS 500.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Time (s) 21/50

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Analysis and simulation of a two phase flow F. Sma , A. Bourgeat, M. Jurak model with phase

Analysis and simulation of a two phase flow F. Sma , A. Bourgeat, M. Jurak model with phase

Scaling Up and Modeling for Transport and Flow in Porous Media Analysis and simulation of a two Dubrovnik, Croatia, 13-16 October 2008 phase flow model with phase appari- tion/disappearance Analysis and simulation of a two phase flow F.

885 views • 88 slides
Phase IB Supplement Phase II Submission Progressing Towards a Phase II Submission Phase IB

Phase IB Supplement Phase II Submission Progressing Towards a Phase II Submission Phase IB

Phase IB Supplement Phase II Submission Progressing Towards a Phase II Submission Phase IB Supplement Foster relationships with strategic partners and investors Advance Phase I research Help bridge the Phase I/Phase II gap

370 views • 9 slides
Phase Angle What is it & why is it Important? Phase Angle Basics What is Phase Angle and

Phase Angle What is it & why is it Important? Phase Angle Basics What is Phase Angle and

RJL Systems is the Industry Innovator and First Company to introduce Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) to the market in 1979. Phase Angle What is it & why is it Important? Phase Angle Basics What is Phase Angle and Why is it

289 views • 10 slides
THE VILLAGE OF OAK PARK MUNICIPAL WAYFINDING PHASE 1 ANALYSIS D PHASE 1_a WEEK 2 THE

THE VILLAGE OF OAK PARK MUNICIPAL WAYFINDING PHASE 1 ANALYSIS D PHASE 1_a WEEK 2 THE

THE VILLAGE OF OAK PARK MUNICIPAL WAYFINDING PHASE 1 ANALYSIS D PHASE 1_a WEEK 2 THE PROCESS Analysis and Documentation WE ARE HERE PHASE 1_b WEEK 6 Recommendations and Key Objectives PHASE 2_a WEEK 8 Design & Implementation

476 views • 32 slides
COMMUNITY GAME RETURN TO PLAY ROADMAP Phase 1 Phase 2A Phase 2B Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 WRU &

COMMUNITY GAME RETURN TO PLAY ROADMAP Phase 1 Phase 2A Phase 2B Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 WRU &

COMMUNITY GAME RETURN TO PLAY ROADMAP Phase 1 Phase 2A Phase 2B Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 WRU & club Return to Household/ Non-Sanctioned sanctioned Season start - Competition Contact household Group Training Small Group

432 views • 6 slides
and Synchronization Project Phase 3 Planning, Analysis & Design (PAD) Phase PMLC Gate Review

and Synchronization Project Phase 3 Planning, Analysis & Design (PAD) Phase PMLC Gate Review

Banner/EAS Chart of Accounts (CoA) Clean-Up and Synchronization Project Phase 3 Planning, Analysis & Design (PAD) Phase PMLC Gate Review February 7, 2018 CoA Phase 3 PAD Phase Gate Review Agenda Project Overview Project Team

510 views • 11 slides
January 2018 Over 60 years of history PHASE IV PHASE II PHASE I PHASE III PROFITABILITY AND

January 2018 Over 60 years of history PHASE IV PHASE II PHASE I PHASE III PROFITABILITY AND

Ripley Corp January 2018 Over 60 years of history PHASE IV PHASE II PHASE I PHASE III PROFITABILITY AND REPOSITIONING BEGINNING SCALE SELECTIVE GROWTH Opening of Acquisition of Credit Opening of First bond Consolidation Ripley

838 views • 30 slides
Phase 2 1 cmarinas@uni-bonn.de Phase 2 Phase 2: BEAST and partial Belle II Phase 3: Full

Phase 2 1 cmarinas@uni-bonn.de Phase 2 Phase 2: BEAST and partial Belle II Phase 3: Full

Phase 2 1 cmarinas@uni-bonn.de Phase 2 Phase 2: BEAST and partial Belle II Phase 3: Full Belle II detector Phase 2 (BEAST II) The SuperKEKB accelerator will be operating, for the first time, with QCS magnets First operation with

597 views • 56 slides
Phase and Frequency detection Detection of sinusoidal signal characteristics Phase

Phase and Frequency detection Detection of sinusoidal signal characteristics Phase

Phase and Frequency detection Detection of sinusoidal signal characteristics Phase Frequency Usually involves some type of feedback. Typically use a local oscillator (DDS) for a comparison. The Analogy PLL The digital World

374 views • 26 slides
Strategic Plan Update Boulder Valley Schools Strategic Planning Process Phase 1: Analysis Phase

Strategic Plan Update Boulder Valley Schools Strategic Planning Process Phase 1: Analysis Phase

Strategic Plan Update Boulder Valley Schools Strategic Planning Process Phase 1: Analysis Phase 2: Strategy Development Leadership Overview Phase 3: Define Long-term Outcomes and Action Planning Strategic Themes Data Gathering Determine

586 views • 13 slides
Phase 5 - Operational Workshop 16 December 1 Uncleared Margin Rules Phases 5 & 6 EU

Phase 5 - Operational Workshop 16 December 1 Uncleared Margin Rules Phases 5 & 6 EU

Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) Euroclear triparty solutions Phase 5 - Operational Workshop 16 December 1 Uncleared Margin Rules Phases 5 & 6 EU Phase 1 Phase 1.5 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 Sept-2016 Feb-2017

680 views • 28 slides
Project Phases of the project III. I. II. PHASE PHASE PHASE May 2014 - 2015+ 2016+

Project Phases of the project III. I. II. PHASE PHASE PHASE May 2014 - 2015+ 2016+

National Business Center Project Phases of the project III. I. II. PHASE PHASE PHASE May 2014 - 2015+ 2016+ October 2015 Support in the Launch of the NBC Transfer of the NBC establishment of the operation in Bratislava as concept

472 views • 22 slides
matrix Police Services Analysis Phase 1 Draft Report Kensington Police Protection and

matrix Police Services Analysis Phase 1 Draft Report Kensington Police Protection and

matrix Police Services Analysis Phase 1 Draft Report Kensington Police Protection and Community consulting group Services District, California Phase 1 Goals u There are three basic goals of the Phase 1 study: To develop an understanding

464 views • 12 slides
What Landowners Need to Know about Intrusions on Surface Use 1 Big Picture Phase 1: Company

What Landowners Need to Know about Intrusions on Surface Use 1 Big Picture Phase 1: Company

What Landowners Need to Know about Intrusions on Surface Use 1 Big Picture Phase 1: Company or agency study Engineering, environmental, etc. Phase 2: Routing Phase 3: Land acquisition (condemnation) Phase 4: Construction 2

765 views • 39 slides
OCP IV and the SWRCP Plan Pieces of Success OCTOBER 6, 2015 Key Inputs and

OCP IV and the SWRCP Plan Pieces of Success OCTOBER 6, 2015 Key Inputs and

OCP IV and the SWRCP Plan Pieces of Success OCTOBER 6, 2015 Key Inputs and Milestones for OCP IV Stakeholder Consultation & Engagement; Ongoing Environmental Scanning Phase V: Phase IV: Phase I: Phase II: Phase III: Phase VI:

374 views • 15 slides
Downtown Plan Community Workshop May, 2009 Downtown Community Plan Process Vision and Phase 1:

Downtown Plan Community Workshop May, 2009 Downtown Community Plan Process Vision and Phase 1:

The Big Picture Downtown Plan Community Workshop May, 2009 Downtown Community Plan Process Vision and Phase 1: Background Analysis Phase 2: Issues and Opportunities Planning Principles Phase 3: Ideas into Directions Phase 4: Draft Plan

364 views • 33 slides
Thermal-Hydraulic Uncertainty Factors for Prediction of Fuel Rod Burst in LBLOCA Safety Analysis

Thermal-Hydraulic Uncertainty Factors for Prediction of Fuel Rod Burst in LBLOCA Safety Analysis

Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Virtual Spring Meeting July 9-10, 2020 Thermal-Hydraulic Uncertainty Factors for Prediction of Fuel Rod Burst in LBLOCA Safety Analysis Joosuk Lee, Deog-Yeon Oh, Young-Seok Bang Korea Institute of

65 views • 4 slides
Fuel Performance Uncertainty to Rod Burst Power in LBLOCA Analysis Joosuk Lee and Young-Seok Bang

Fuel Performance Uncertainty to Rod Burst Power in LBLOCA Analysis Joosuk Lee and Young-Seok Bang

Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Virtual Spring Meeting July 9-10, 2020 Fuel Performance Uncertainty to Rod Burst Power in LBLOCA Analysis Joosuk Lee and Young-Seok Bang Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety 62 Gwahak-ro, Yusong-gu,

314 views • 4 slides
CEF a game in which two teams try to score points by throwing a ball basketball 8 74 through a

CEF a game in which two teams try to score points by throwing a ball basketball 8 74 through a

WORD UNIT NO PAGE DEFINITION PoS EXAMPLE IPA CEF a game in which two teams try to score points by throwing a ball basketball 8 74 through a high net, or the ball used in this game noun He plays a lot of basketball.

288 views • 3 slides
National Gambling Statistics Casinos, Bingo, Limited Pay-out Machines and Betting on Horse Racing

National Gambling Statistics Casinos, Bingo, Limited Pay-out Machines and Betting on Horse Racing

National Gambling Statistics Casinos, Bingo, Limited Pay-out Machines and Betting on Horse Racing and Sport offered by Bookmakers and Totalisators Audited Statistics 2018/19 Financial Year 1 April 2018 31 March 2019 Introduction The

1.23k views • 73 slides
NSK HOT METAL FORGING NSK GROUP About Us, NSK Group NSK Group includes the companies NSK

NSK HOT METAL FORGING NSK GROUP About Us, NSK Group NSK Group includes the companies NSK

NSK HOT METAL FORGING NSK GROUP About Us, NSK Group NSK Group includes the companies NSK Automotive, NSK Hot Metal Forging, NSK Rubber Production Plant, RAN Industrial Products, and NSK Do Brasil. In a total area of 48.000 m2, of which 15.000

577 views • 13 slides
LEI Experience on modelling spent fuel pools during severe accident conditions T. Kaliatka, V.

LEI Experience on modelling spent fuel pools during severe accident conditions T. Kaliatka, V.

LEI Experience on modelling spent fuel pools during severe accident conditions T. Kaliatka, V. Vileiniskis, A. Kaliatka and E. Uspuras Laboratory of Nuclear Installations Safety, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas,

657 views • 22 slides
240 & 242 West 10 th Street, Borough of Manhattan How to Testify Via Zoom:

240 & 242 West 10 th Street, Borough of Manhattan How to Testify Via Zoom:

April 28 th , 2020 Name of Landmark Building Type of Presentation Month xx, year Public Hearing The current proposal is: Item 8 & 9; LPC-20-07361/LPC-20-07360 240 & 242 West 10 th Street, Borough of Manhattan How to Testify Via Zoom:

525 views • 9 slides
Response to Stakeholder Feedback 1 August 2, 2019 Anacostia River Sediment Project (ARSP) 2

Response to Stakeholder Feedback 1 August 2, 2019 Anacostia River Sediment Project (ARSP) 2

Anacostia River Sediment Project Feasibility Study Response to Stakeholder Feedback 1 August 2, 2019 Anacostia River Sediment Project (ARSP) 2 Study Area Operable Units (OUs) Three Operable Units Washington Channel Kingman Lake Main Stem

334 views • 17 slides

More recommend