Giant Dipole Resonance with at very low temperatures and the critical behavior
Balaram Dey
Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre 1/AF Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata-700064, INDIA
Supervisor : Prof Sudhee Ranjan Banerjee
16 -09-2015 COMEX5-2015
Balaram Dey Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre 1/AF Bidhan Nagar, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Giant Dipole Resonance with at very low temperatures and the critical behavior Balaram Dey Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre 1/AF Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata-700064, INDIA Supervisor : Prof Sudhee Ranjan Banerjee COMEX5-2015 16 -09-2015 Giant
Giant Dipole Resonance with at very low temperatures and the critical behavior
Balaram Dey
Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre 1/AF Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata-700064, INDIA
Supervisor : Prof Sudhee Ranjan Banerjee
16 -09-2015 COMEX5-2015
Giant Resonance : Collective modes of vibration of nucleus
E (MeV) 5 10 15 20 25 30 GDR Strength Fn (a.u.) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 EGDR GDR
2 2 GDR 2 2 2 2 2 GDR GDR
E Γ F E (Ε Ε ) E Γ
Centroid Energy : Inversely proportional to the linear dimension of the nucleus. Strength Function: Gives an idea about the nuclear shape degrees of freedom. Resonance Width : Related to the damping mechanism of the collective motion.
Giant Dipole Resonance
Temperature (MeV)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
GDR Width (MeV) 5 10
120Sn
(b) J = 15
Evolution of GDR width as a function of temperature
Experimental observation Mostly investigated Nucleus 120Sn Experimental systematic shows GDR width increases monotonically with temperatures (typically 6-10 MeV for change in ‘T’ of 1.5-2.5 MeV)
Why GDR width increases with increase in temperature ???
PLB 709 (2012) 9
Thermal Shape Fluctuation Model : (∆β vs T)
GDR Width (MeV)
5 10 5
120Sn
(b) J = 15
Temperature (MeV) GDR width (MeV)
3 2 1
!! At low temperatures (T<1.5 MeV), the picture is not clear !!
Critical Temperature Fluctuation Model : Including an important physics point
GDR vibration itself produce a quadrupole moment causing the nuclear shape to fluctuate even at T = 0 MeV ( GDR vibration induced intrinsic fluctuation) : βGDR
The effect of thermal fluctuation on GDR width will appear
GDR Width (MeV)
5 10 5
120Sn
(b) J = 15
Temperature (MeV) GDR width (MeV)
3 2 1
Critical behavior :
TSFM CTFM
Study of GDR width at very low temperatures (T < 1.5 MeV).
We probed A=100 mass region at very low temperature (T ~ 0.8 to 1.5 MeV ) to understand exact nature of the damping mechanism inside the nucleus.
Verify the critical behavior : The number of GDR width measurements at low T < 1 MeV are inadequate to conclude that GDR width remains same at below the critical point. Mass dependence of the critical behavior. My WORK:
Experimental Details
High energy gamma photons are the main tools to study GDR characteristics Need a detector system with high detection efficiency and very good time resolution.
Projectile : 4He Target : 93Nb E lab : 28, 35, 42, 50 MeV
4He + 93Nb 97Tc* E* : 29.3, 36.0, 43.0, 50.4 MeV J = 10 – 20 h
LAMBDA
Multiplicity Filter Liquid Scintillator
Experimental Setup Electronics Setup
ARRAY
TOP MULT
F.A DELAY (Attenuator) 100 ns
QDC 1 QDC 2 TDC 1 TDC 2
FAN IN (Linear) CFD 1 FAN IN (Logic) 20 ns
2 s 20 nsFOLD
5 m 5 m 5 m
E long (1/10) E short (9/10)
Long gate 2 s Short gate 50 ns
F.A F.A CFD 2 CFD 3
BOTT MULT
CFD 6 CFD 7
5 m
OR OR OR ORDISC FAN IN (Logic)
150 nsAND 2 DISC GDG
100 ns 40 ns 20 nsCFD 4 FA N IN (Lo gic)
QDC 3 QDC 4
DISC DISC 100 ns FAN IN (Logic) LED 3 LED 2 LED 1 VETO DISC FAN IN (Logic) AND 1
70 ns 70 nsCFD 5 GDG
Schematic Electronics Circuit Diagram for LAMBDA and Multiplicity
Schematic Electronics Circuit Diagram for BC501A
TOF Spectrum PSD spectrum cluster summing Cosmic rejection
Channel Number
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
Counts
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Time-of-flight spectrum Prompt - cutExtraction of GDR parameters
Experimental data compared with a theoretical model (CASCADE) to extract the GDR parameter !! The following steps are essential !!
5 10 15 20 25 Yield /(0.5 MeV) 100 101 102 103 104 105 E (MeV)
angular momentum distribution
parameter
(1) Detector simulation studies using GEANT4
Detector response function must be folded with CASCADE calculation. Only after that it can be compared with experimental spectrum
NIM A 582 (2007) 603
(2) Mapping of experimental Fold to Angular Momentum space with a very realistic technique
NIM A624 (2010) 148
Fold
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Counts
100 101 102 103 104
Angular Momentum ( )
5 10 15 20 25 30
Counts x 103
5 10 15 20 25 30 Very essential To determine average angular momentum To determine average rotational energy To construct initial population matrix for CASCADE calculation
J = C
m M M M M P
max
exp 1 1 2
Incident distribution :
Geant4 Simulation
(3) Nuclear level density parameter from neutron evaporation spectrum
Crucial input for CASCADE Calculations & important for the proper estimation
Neutron detector (BC501A) is generally used to measure the neutron energy spectrum by TOF technique
100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 5 10 15 20 25 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 10 15 20 25
Elab = 28 MeV Elab = 35 MeV Elab = 42 MeV Elab = 50 MeV
F > 2 F=2 F=3 F>4 F=2 F=3 F>4 F=2 F=3 F>4
Yield / 0.5 MeV Energy (MeV)
High energy gamma spectra along with CASCADE calculation
Final GDR spectra along with CASCADE calculation
Temperature (MeV)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
GDR width (MeV)
4 6 8 10
GDR width (MeV)
4 6 8 10 12 TSFM CTFM PDM
(a) (b)
Results and Discussion
Tc = 1.08 MeV
Balaram Dey et al., Physics Letter B 731 (2014) 92
First experimental data at below and above the critical temperature
First exp data point in A ~ 100
GDR induced intrinsic fluctuation could play a decisive role in describing the increase of GDR width as a function of T. Intrinsic fluctuation due to GDR vibration should be incorporated in TSFM (macroscopically) to explain the behavior of GDR width at low T.
PDM : PRC 86 (2012) 044333
Summary and conclusion
A systematic study of the Giant Dipole Resonance width at very low temperature (T = 0.8 – 1.5 MeV) in A ~ 100 mass region. GDR widths have been compared with different theoretical calculations (TSFM, CTFM and PDM). TSFM fails to explain the experimental data where as CTFM and PDM calculation nicely matches with the experimental data. GDR induced intrinsic fluctuation plays an important role in describing the evolution GDR width as a function of temperature First experimental data at below and above the critical temperature. Microscopic PDM (with pairing fluctuation) also explain the data very well. It would also be interesting if the pairing fluctuation can be included in the TSFM calculation.
GDR group at VECC, kolkata, India
Channel Number
100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Energy (MeV)
4 8 12 16 20 24 28
Channel Number
100 120 140 160 180 200
Counts
200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Channel Number
160 200 240 280 100 200 300 400 500 Channel Number 200 400 600 800 1000 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 22Na 241Am - 9Be Cosmic
0.511 MeV 1.274 MeV 4.43 MeV 23.1 MeV
1/A
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03
GDR
0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16
40Ca 80Zr 120Sn 97Tc 208PbGDR = 0.04 + 4.13/A
Temperature (MeV) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 GDR
Detector properties
35cm BaF2 detector = 960 ps 5cm BaF2 detector = 460 ps
35cm BaF2 detector = 16/ √E MeV thus 20% at 0.662 MeV 5cm BaF2 detector = 12% at 0.662 MeV
35cm BaF2 detector = 95 % at 0.662 MeV, 93 % 10 MeV. 5cm BaF2 detector = 80 % at 0.662 MeV, 73% at 1 MeV.
cluster summing technique(3x3) 35cm BaF2 detector = ~ 50 % from energy range 10MeV
cluster summing technique(7x7) 35cm BaF2 detector = ~ 70 % from energy range 10 MeV What is the advantage of BaF2 detector over NaI detector?
where as NaI is highly hygroscopic.
in modular(array) from since they have to be kept inside a air tight container.
comparable.
timing resolution than NaI (250ns)
greater than NaI(3.67 g/cc) hence for efficient for high energy detection.
NaI(53) which is required for high energy gamma
capture cross section for thermal neutrons due to the neutron magic number
1/A 0.005 0.010 0.015 Tc (MeV) 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 Tc = 0.7 + 37.5/A
208Pb 120Sn 63Cu