Backscatter communication for wearables/IoT Deepak Ganesan Associate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

backscatter communication for wearables iot
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Backscatter communication for wearables/IoT Deepak Ganesan Associate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Backscatter communication for wearables/IoT Deepak Ganesan Associate Professor Computer Science UMass Amherst Emerging ecosystem of on-body sensors GPS, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, activity monitoring Camera, Microphone wristband blood pressure


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Backscatter communication for wearables/IoT

Deepak Ganesan Associate Professor Computer Science UMass Amherst

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Emerging ecosystem of on-body sensors

activity monitoring wristband GPS, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Camera, Microphone blood pressure glucose monitors implantable “nanosensors” sleepshirt sleep monitor

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Why is communication a problem?

Communica)on ¡is ¡a ¡major ¡bo/leneck ¡for ¡low-­‑power ¡opera)on

Power Consumption (uW)

1 1000 1000000

Communication Sensing

802.15.4 (Zigbee) Bluetooth Low Energy Ultra-Wide Band Camera (Stonyman) ECG Microphone Accelerometer WiFi

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Backscatter communication

Backscatter reader Sensor

Backscatter is extremely efficient because the device is reflecting the signal rather than generating a signal.

Transistor

Carrier Wave Reflected Signal

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Why is backscatter a challenging domain?

Carrier Wave Reflected Signal

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Why is backscatter a challenging domain?

Carrier Wave Reflected Signal

Energy

available ¡energy ¡is ¡miniscule

distance from reader

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Why is backscatter a challenging domain?

Carrier Wave Reflected Signal

  • 0.3
  • 0.2
  • 0.1

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 2 4 6 8 10 12

Amplitude Time (seconds)

I Channel Q Channel

Antenna coupling

  • 1
  • 0.8
  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 2 4 6 8 10 12

Amplitude Time (seconds)

I Channel Q Channel

Antenna rotation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Why is backscatter a challenging domain?

Carrier Wave Reflected Signal

Human activity

  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 2 4 6 8 10

Signal Strength Transmission Time (ms)

transmitted signal decoding fails

  • 0.6
  • 0.4
  • 0.2

0.2 0.4 0.6 2 4 6 8 10 12

Amplitude Time (seconds)

I Channel Q Channel

Capacitor charge decay

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Why is backscatter a challenging domain?

Carrier Wave Reflected Signal

RX

0° 90° ADC PLL VCO ADC Antenna Low Noise Amplifier Mixer Mixer Low-pass Filter Low-pass Filter Base Band Base Band

TX

0° 90° DAC Base Band PLL VCO DAC Antenna Power Amplifier Mixer Mixer Low-pass Filter Base Band Low-pass Filter

TX RX

Sensor Antenna Switch Z0 Z1 Antenna Comparator D1 C1 C2 R1 R2 +

  • Reader

Message Processing

Asymmetry

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Why is backscatter a challenging domain?

Carrier Wave Reflected Signal

Range Throughput Power

bit-by-bit backscatter

[NSDI 2014]

Re-thinking tag architecture

[Mobicom 2014]

Hybrid harvesting

[MobiSys 2012]

Concurrent backscatter

[HotWireless 2014]

Asymmetry

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Taking stock…

Major step is to measure/evaluate/iterate under uncontrolled environments Many promising techniques for solving hard problems in backscatter: range (50 ft), throughput (Mbps), harvesting (Reader/Ambient/WiFi)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Case for a backscatter testbed

  • Testbed #1: Backscatter-instrumented house
  • Reader/WiFi/Ambient Backscatter for IoT/wearables
  • Testbed #2: Backscatter-instrumented human
  • Mobile backscatter reader +“bandaid” sensors
  • Why? design complete solutions
  • Robustness in indoor environments
  • Perpetual link while user is mobile
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Computer Science@UMASS Amherst

Thank you