Background Flanigan et al. NEJM 2001 1 8/5/2014 Surgery to remove - - PDF document

background
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Background Flanigan et al. NEJM 2001 1 8/5/2014 Surgery to remove - - PDF document

8/5/2014 Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Removal of the Breast Primary in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Mylin A. Torres Assistant Professor Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University Background Flanigan et al. NEJM


slide-1
SLIDE 1

8/5/2014 1 Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University

Removal of the Breast Primary in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Mylin A. Torres Assistant Professor Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University

Background

Flanigan et al. NEJM 2001

slide-2
SLIDE 2

8/5/2014 2

Surgery to remove the Breast Primary in Breast Cancer Patients with Metastatic Disease

slide-3
SLIDE 3

8/5/2014 3

Study Aim

To assess the effect of removal of primary tumor

  • n overall survival in women presented with

metastatic breast cancer

slide-4
SLIDE 4

8/5/2014 4

Statistics

  • N=350
  • Detect an expected improvement in overall

survival of 6 months in patients treated with breast surgery compared to baseline median survival of 18 months in patients not treated with surgery. alpha = 0.05, power of 80%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

8/5/2014 5

Local Progression Free Survival

slide-6
SLIDE 6

8/5/2014 6

Distant Progression Free Survival

Limitations

  • Her2+ patients did not receive trastuzumab
  • Statistical assumptions regarding baseline

median survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer is low and the study was not powered to detect a difference of <6 months

  • r <4% change in overall survival
  • Survival was low in both arms compared with

more modern series

  • Supraclavicular lymph node surgical clearance

in N3 patients

slide-7
SLIDE 7

8/5/2014 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8/5/2014 8

Objectives

  • Primary: To assess if early surgical treatment
  • f the primary breast cancer in women

presenting with Stage IV disease effects

  • verall survival
  • Secondary:

– Progression Free Survival (local) – Quality of Life – Morbidity

Overall Survival

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8/5/2014 9

Overall Survival and Number of Bone Metastasis

Conclusions

  • No statistical difference in overall survival at

early follow‐up

  • Potentially important subgroup differences

– Patients with solitary bone metastases had prolonged survival – Patients with aggressive phenotypes appear to derive less benefit from early surgical intervention – Multiple liver and/or pulmonary metastases had a significant worse prognosis with initial surgery

slide-10
SLIDE 10

8/5/2014 10

Limitations

  • Biopsy was not required of metastatic disease

even if solitary lesion was found

  • Heterogeneous local and systemic treatments
  • Patients did not have to achieve a CR or PR to

systemic therapy before randomization

  • Multiple unplanned subset analyses with

small patient numbers without Bonferroni correction

  • Short Follow‐up

Take Home Message

  • Neither study of metastatic disease supports

the use of surgery to the primary breast tumor in women with metastatic breast cancer

slide-11
SLIDE 11

8/5/2014 11