SLIDE 80 Be ne fit/ Cost Ratio Be ne fit/ Cost Ratio
All ma jo r sho re pro te c tio n wo rks a re typic a lly re q uire d to unde rg o a fo rma l Co nse rvatio n Ontario Class E nviro nme ntal Asse ssme nt fo r Re me dial F lo o d and E ro sio n Co ntro l Pro je c ts (Cla ss
E A) whic h wo uld re q uire a full a sse ssme nt o f a ll po te ntia l me a sure s, the ir po te ntia l e nviro nme nta l impa c t a nd a n e xa mina tio n o f the b e ne fit/ c o st ra tio a sso c ia te d with e a c h.
While the sc a le o f sho re pro te c tio n a sso c ia te d with individua l pro pe rtie s is to o sma ll to wa rra nt
this, the c umula tive impa c ts o f g ra nting pe rmissio n to c o nstruc t sho re pro te c tio n o ve r e xte nsive a re a s o f the sho re line is c o mpa ra b le to a ve ry la rg e pro je c t a nd a s suc h re q uire s so me a sse ssme nt o f the b e ne fit/ c o st ra tio
Suc h a c a lc ula tio n wo uld no rma lly inc lude the c o sts a sso c ia te d with studie s o f the site a nd
pro c e sse s a ffe c ting it, the de sig n a nd c o nstruc tio n o f the struc ture , a nd the c o st o f ma inta ining the struc ture o ve r its life spa n. Additio na lly, so me c o sting o f the po te ntia l e nviro nme nta l impa c ts wo uld b e inc lude d a nd so me o f the se impa c ts mig ht pro hib it c o nstruc tio n a lto g e the r
I
n the c a se o f mo st priva te sho re pro te c tio n struc ture s no fo rma l b e ne fit/ c o st a sse ssme nt is unde rta ke n a nd ve ry fe w o f the m inc lude a fo rma l de sig n a nd c o sting b y a q ua lifie d c o a sta l e ng ine e r. I n g e ne ra l o n a la rg e ly rura l c o a st suc h a s this it is like ly tha t the ra tio , e ve n witho ut a sse ssme nt o f e nviro nme nta l impa c ts is to o sma ll to suppo rt c o nstruc tio n.
All ma jo r sho re pro te c tio n wo rks a re typic a lly re q uire d to unde rg o a fo rma l Co nse rvatio n Ontario Class E nviro nme ntal Asse ssme nt fo r Re me dial F lo o d and E ro sio n Co ntro l Pro je c ts (Cla ss
E A) whic h wo uld re q uire a full a sse ssme nt o f a ll po te ntia l me a sure s, the ir po te ntia l e nviro nme nta l impa c t a nd a n e xa mina tio n o f the b e ne fit/ c o st ra tio a sso c ia te d with e a c h.
While the sc a le o f sho re pro te c tio n a sso c ia te d with individua l pro pe rtie s is to o sma ll to wa rra nt
this, the c umula tive impa c ts o f g ra nting pe rmissio n to c o nstruc t sho re pro te c tio n o ve r e xte nsive a re a s o f the sho re line is c o mpa ra b le to a ve ry la rg e pro je c t a nd a s suc h re q uire s so me a sse ssme nt o f the b e ne fit/ c o st ra tio
Suc h a c a lc ula tio n wo uld no rma lly inc lude the c o sts a sso c ia te d with studie s o f the site a nd
pro c e sse s a ffe c ting it, the de sig n a nd c o nstruc tio n o f the struc ture , a nd the c o st o f ma inta ining the struc ture o ve r its life spa n. Additio na lly, so me c o sting o f the po te ntia l e nviro nme nta l impa c ts wo uld b e inc lude d a nd so me o f the se impa c ts mig ht pro hib it c o nstruc tio n a lto g e the r
I
n the c a se o f mo st priva te sho re pro te c tio n struc ture s no fo rma l b e ne fit/ c o st a sse ssme nt is unde rta ke n a nd ve ry fe w o f the m inc lude a fo rma l de sig n a nd c o sting b y a q ua lifie d c o a sta l e ng ine e r. I n g e ne ra l o n a la rg e ly rura l c o a st suc h a s this it is like ly tha t the ra tio , e ve n witho ut a sse ssme nt o f e nviro nme nta l impa c ts is to o sma ll to suppo rt c o nstruc tio n.