Aurora Central High School Accountability Hearing Rico Munn, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

aurora central high school accountability hearing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Aurora Central High School Accountability Hearing Rico Munn, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aurora Central High School Accountability Hearing Rico Munn, Superintendent Jeff Park, Executive Director, Office of Autonomous Schools (OAS) Gerardo De La Garza, Principal, Aurora Central Kate Garvin, Director of Family Advocacy and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Aurora Central High School Accountability Hearing

Rico Munn, Superintendent Jeff Park, Executive Director, Office of Autonomous Schools (OAS) Gerardo De La Garza, Principal, Aurora Central Kate Garvin, Director of Family Advocacy and Engagement, OAS Knyaw Mu, Parent, Aurora Central High School

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Overview

  • History & Context
  • Office of Autonomous Schools
  • Implementation of Innovation Plan & Work with

External Management Partner

  • Parent Perspective
  • Continuing the Work

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Aurora Central High School: A Snapshot

Total Enrollment: 2,044 Race/Ethnicity:

  • 68.7% Hispanic
  • 16.7% Black
  • 5.8% Asian
  • 3.8% White
  • 2.8% More than one race
  • 1.3% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

English Language Learners:

  • NEP, LEP, FEP: 56.5%
  • FELL & PHLOTE: 16.2%

Home Languages: 46 Immigrant: 10.5% Refugee: 7.7% Free/Reduced Price Lunch: 67.9% Homeless: 5.6% Gifted & Talented: 2.9% Students with Disabilities: 13.8%

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

ACHS Points of Pride

Student & Staff Recognitions:

  • Home to 2019 Boettcher Scholar
  • Home to three 2018 Daniels Scholars
  • ACHS students accepted into the prestigious UCD

& Anschutz Medical Campus BA/BS MD Program

  • Armonium Tsegaye in 2018
  • Jesús Dorado Madera in 2017
  • Yishak Bedaso in 2017
  • 2019 East Metro Athletic Conference (EMAC)

Boys Soccer League Champions

  • 2017 Unified Basketball State Champions
  • Home to a 2019 Boettcher Foundation Teacher

Recognition Award Winner

  • Home to the 2016 Civic Educator of the Year

Award on behalf of The Civic Canopy

  • Home to the 2016-17 Colorado School

Psychologist of the Year (Colorado Society of School Psychologists) & Challenge Denver Education Champion Award Winner

  • ACHS Music Teacher Wins 7 Games on

Jeopardy! During Season 35 4 Community & Donor Partnerships:

  • ACHS Alumnus donated funds for a new digital

marquee in front of the school in 2017

  • The Denver Broncos and NFL Foundation

Grassroots Program provided a $250,000 grant to install a new turf field in 2019

  • Community donors funded a new College and

Career Center at the school in 2017

  • ACHS student leaders are teaming up with

community partners to organize neighborhood clean-up events in 2019

  • The Trojan Wellness Center provides free and/or

low-cost medical care for ACHS students and

  • siblings. Medical, dental and behavioral health

services are provided thanks to partnerships with Aurora Mental Health, Children’s Hospital Dental and Every Child Pediatrics.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Aurora Central High School Pathways Request

Aurora Public Schools is asking the State Board to allow Aurora Central to continue implementation of the Innovation Pathway and its Innovation Plan for an additional two years. Through the implementation of the Innovation Plan, Aurora Central has demonstrated improvements in climate and culture and establishing the systems and structures needed to drive academic improvements. In order to see the desired academic improvements, it is critical for Aurora Central to build on this progress, rather than start over with a new Pathway. This additional time would also be consistent with the research that indicates that:

  • Full school turnaround takes 3-5 years, with larger high schools requiring more time
  • Successful turnaround requires a school-wide culture shift, often preceding

instructional change

  • Within the first three years of turnaround efforts, evaluators of success can expect to

see improvements in leading indicators and progress against baseline data.1

1 Mass Insight Education & Research, “Aurora Central High School (ACHS) Report on Progress 2015 to 2019,” September 2019, p. 4.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Accountability Pathways Statutory Framework

  • The statutory framework for State-directed Pathways is based on an evaluation of a

school or district’s capacity to carry out turnaround work.

  • C.R.S. 22-11-209 and 22-11-210 are intended to capture the capacity of a district

and/or school to:

  • Plan for, support, and lead school improvement and turnaround efforts;
  • Implement change; and
  • Partner with external groups to receive support.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

APS: 2016-17 Prior to State-directed Action

  • APS had a District Performance Framework Rating of Accredited with Priority

Improvement and was in Year 5 on the State’s Accountability Clock

  • Early Implementation of Communities Organized to Reach Excellence (CORE)

Reform Framework, which was launched in 2015. CORE focuses on:

  • Increasing District and School Staff Capacity for Change
  • Shifting the Organizational Culture Regarding Change and Success through:
  • Communities of Practice
  • Innovative Systems and Structures
  • CORE Improvement Strategies and Timeline
  • APS had never implemented one of the State Turnaround Pathways:
  • Innovation
  • External Management Partner
  • Charter Conversion
  • Closure

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

APS: 2019-20

  • APS has a District Performance Rating of Accredited with Improvement and has not been on Performance

Watch since 2016-17.

  • APS is fully implementing its CORE Reform Framework. Examples include:

Establishing the ACTION Zone, an Innovation Zone

Participating in Communities of Practice, such as University of Virginia Partnership for Leaders in Education, Communities in Schools, U.S. Human Capital Academy, etc.

Implementing a set of district-required actions for each year a school is on the State’s Performance Watch

Pursuing and implementing Early Action of State Turnaround Pathways in two schools in Year 4 on the State Accountability Clock

  • APS has implemented all four State Turnaround Pathways:

Innovation: APS established the ACTION Zone, an Innovation Zone, with five schools with State- approved Innovation Status, including Aurora Central.

External Management Partner: APS is working with External Management Partners to provide additional capacity in targeted areas at three schools: Aurora Central, Gateway High School and North Middle School.

Charter Conversion: APS has converted Fletcher Elementary School to Rocky Mountain Prep.

Closure: APS closed APS Online and Fletcher Elementary School and proposed the closure of HOPE Online Learning Centers within APS due to underperformance.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

ACHS Timeline

9

2015

  • Spring 2015: APS investigates turnaround options for ACHS and APS BOE directs district to pursue Innovation

Status

  • June 2015: APS asks CDE to take early action and recognize Innovation as a Turnaround Pathway for ACHS; State

Board declines

  • 2015-16: New Principal Hired and APS begins design work for ACTION Zone and Innovation Plan for ACHS

2016

  • May 2016: State Board of Education approves ACHS’ Innovation Plan, but declines to decide whether it will be

an approved Turnaround Pathway

  • 2016-17: ACHS begins implementation of Innovation Plan

2017

  • April 2017: State Board Holds Hearing on ACHS after 5 years on the Accountability Clock
  • May 2017: State Board directs ACHS to implement Innovation Pathway and targeted External Management

Partner

  • 2017-18: Year 1 of implementation of Innovation Status as a Turnaround Pathway and Year 1 of work with an

External Management Partner 2018

  • 2018-19: Year 2 of Implementation of Innovation Status as a Turnaround Pathway

2019

  • March 2019: CDE awards EASI grant to support ACHS’ work with Mass Insight for the 2018-19 and 19-20 school

years

  • 2019-20: Year 3 of Implementation of Innovation Status as a Turnaround Pathway

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

ACHS Review & Analysis

10

  • Historical Review
  • Reviewed APS History since 2013
  • Reviewed History of ACHS since 2013, including State-directed Action in 2017
  • Third-Party Reviews
  • Onsite review conducted by consultant Shelley Billig, formerly of RMC using CDE’s 2015 Diagnostic

Review Standards and comparing to previous reviews of ACHS, since she had been a participant in the 2012 and 2014 reviews

  • Review by Mass Insight over two years of implementation
  • Internal Review & Analysis
  • Conducted by APS staff from OAS, Division of Equity in Learning, Research & Accountability, Legal, and

Office of Superintendent

  • Review & Analysis of School-Level Data, Implementation, CDE Progress Monitoring Report, and Billig

Consulting’s Third-Party Review

  • Parent/Family Input
  • Parents provided input on ACHS’ Innovation Plan through a SWOT analysis
  • Hosted Parent Coffees and Parents in Action Meetings
  • Staff Input
  • Staff participated in External Review
  • Staff also provided input on ACHS’ Innovation Plan through a SWOT Analysis
  • Student Input
  • Students provided input on ACHS’ Innovation Plan through a SWOT analysis

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Third-Party Review: Billig Consulting, LLC

11 11 Standard Summary of Contrast to Past Performance 1: Standards & Instructional Planning ACHS teachers have consistently aligned their teaching to standards in the past. However, their instructional lessons were typically aimed well below grade-level expectations. Former planning approaches featured far more direct instruction (lecture) followed by drill and practice. Currently teachers allot time for mini-lessons but allocate more time for student-centered activities. In the past, there were fewer classes that encouraged collaboration among students, fewer opportunities for spiraling, and less attention paid to reteaching. 2: Best First Instruction Remarkable progress has been made in the quality of first best instruction for students, though there is much more work to be done. In the past, teachers used the Hunter gradual release model for instruction, but they spent too much time lecturing and consistently used drill and practice worksheets. Large percentages of students were disengaged. Many classrooms were poorly managed such that behavioral disruptions, cell phone use, and headphones were the norm. Some teachers shouted over students and little learning occurred in many classrooms. There were notable exceptions, but most of the exceptions were in advanced learning classrooms. There was some evidence of skillful teacher questioning, but in most classrooms, teachers only worked with a handful of students. Now first best instruction is delivered using a common instructional framework with limited time spent lecturing the students and more time devoted to activities. Teachers more often use culturally and temporally relevant materials. Teachers frequently monitor student learning by reviewing students’ work during practice time (rather than sitting at their desks). More students are on task now than in the past, though some students are still allowed to opt out of instruction. Both in the past and currently, more differentiation, more advanced thinking skills questions, and more effective strategies for English learners need to be employed.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Third-Party Review: Billig Consulting, LLC

12 12 Standard Summary of Contrast to Past Performance 3: Assessment of and for Learning The school has made many improvements in their approach to analyzing data and using results to improve instruction. In the past, review of data was cursory and infrequent. Teachers used chapter and unit tests as formative assessments and as the basis for reteaching. They offered feedback to students that was often not specific, timely, or constructive. Teachers now align their assessment practices to the standards. They are at least trying to devise assessments that align to the rigor of the standard and planning to analyze and use assessment results for reteaching. They have a structured data protocol and engage in data dialogue during PLCs and after interims are administered on data days devoted to understanding student strengths and needs. Feedback to students is more frequent and occurs as the students are working. Most of the time, feedback is specific and constructive, though sometimes it is general and superficial. Teachers still only perform a cursory analysis of summative data.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Third-Party Review: Billig Consulting, LLC

13 13 Standard Summary of Contrast to Past Performance 4: Tiered Support ACHS has had a consistent need to provide effective academic and behavioral interventions to students. Years ago, they tried to meet academic intervention needs by targeting students on the cusp of proficiency to help them gain enough knowledge and skills to boost their performance. Students performing below grade level were expected to be supported by teachers using differentiated instruction, but there was little evidence that appropriate levels of support were provided. Software-based credit accrual opportunities were available to students in need. Large percentages of students were being identified for special education services and receiving ESS support. The school currently still expects teachers to provide differentiated instruction and intervention and still overidentifies students for ESS. There is no universal screener being used for academics and no clearly defined Tier II and III interventions. As in the past, tutoring, enrichment, and credit accrual sessions are available to students. The credit accrual approach now uses blended learning and is more effective in helping students recover credits and graduate on time. Family and community involvement approaches are more systematized than in the past and appear to be more effective. Families are asked to review data and engage in action planning to address a school problem of their choice. Some have implemented planned actions while some need more time. The school has consistently had many community partners, but in the past, the partners’ goals appeared to have been given priority over the school’s goals. Plans for coordinated community partner work are being formulated and will be launched in the next few weeks. This should lead to greater effectiveness since the effort should result in less duplication of services and more targeted support to address student needs. The school continues to be effective in providing information about available community services to meet health and other needs.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Third-Party Review: Billig Consulting, LLC

14 14 Standard Summary of Contrast to Past Performance 5: Leadership The school has been through many changes, most of which represent improvements compared to the past. The former principal’s style was not valued and there was a lot of conflict among the adults and the students in the building. Change strategies were not adequately focused on instruction and instructional rigor. Change management was ineffective. The climate for change was poor. With the current principal, there has been more continuity and steadier leadership. The climate was changed first as many new staff were hired to replace the 70 who left. Now the focus is on instructional rigor and instructional quality. One major difference from the past is that teachers are generally on board with the current focus and believe that it is the right one to implement to improve students’ academic growth and performance. In stark contrast to the past, there are strong collaborative processes in place, a clearer set of strategies for improvement, and a desire to work together to make a difference in the students’ lives. 6: Culture and Climate The culture in the school five years ago was described as toxic and chaotic. Hallways and other common areas were always filled with students and characterized by students and adults yelling at each other, cursing, and jostling each other. Many students failed to follow any directions issued by deans, monitors, and teachers. Many classrooms had students who were completely off task, talking on cell phones, listening to music on headphones, and interacting with each other both verbally and physically, often without consequence. Students reported that they disliked the school and did not feel safe. School climate and culture data reflected this negative state. Currently, the building is orderly and considered safe by nearly all respondents. Data from climate surveys affirm that the school has become a more attractive and welcoming place for students and adults. The learning environment is positive: teachers display caring attitudes toward students, warmly greeting them by name and welcoming them to class. The front office is equally warm and welcoming to family members and the school provides translation services for parents or guardians who are not fluent in

  • English. The physical structure is well maintained, and there are symbols, pictures, artifacts, and other

displays that evidence the positive value that the school places on diversity. The current culture is characterized by respect, positive reinforcement, collaboration, and support. It feels like a different school.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Third-Party Review: Billig Consulting, LLC

15 15 Standard Summary of Contrast to Past Performance 7: Educator Effectiveness Professional learning has consistently been an emphasis in the school as a key strategy to improve student performance. However, the focus of professional learning has changed each year, as has the format and effectiveness. For example, in some years, teachers participated in PLCs and in some years they did not. In some years, there was sustained professional development in one area, but in most years there was not. Some years featured expectations for application but follow up was inconsistent and not part of the system. Currently, the school has aligned professional development with overarching school goals. PLCs focus on the instructional framework and rigor, along with student-centered instruction. Leaders and coaches serve as PLC facilitators and then follow up to provide meaningful feedback for improvement. The emphasis is on immediate implementation of strategies and dialogue using data and a common observation/feedback protocol. This tighter more system-oriented and systematic approach provides a common set of expectations and practices within the school. 8: Continuous Improvement ACHS has consistently developed improvement plans directed toward increasing student growth and academic performance. Current plans reflect systems thinking and are more aligned to evidence- based practices and data on needs. The mission of the school changed from being focused on STEM to having an emphasis on producing global leaders and global and local actions. The former STEM mission was articulated and addressed. The current globally focused mission has not been adequately addressed: school practices do not align with the mission. Improvement plans continue to be formulated based on data analysis, research, external reviews, and stakeholder input. Representativeness of stakeholders has varied by year.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Data

16

Leading Indicators

  • Attendance
  • Average Daily Attendance: + 3.2 ppts.

since 14-15

  • Student Behavior
  • # of referrals: +20% since 14-15; -40%

since 15-16

  • Suspensions: +13% since 14-15; -42%

since 15-16

  • Expulsions: -50% since 14-15; -29% since

15-16

  • Students with ICAPs: +33 ppts. since 14-15
  • Students Accessing Credentials (AP, IB, CE,

CTE, Internships, Digital Badging): + 40.9 ppts. since 14-15

  • Teacher Turnover: -8.7 ppts. since 14-15
  • Parent Involvement:
  • 4X as many parents participated in

parent survey in 18-19 compared to 16- 17

  • +14 ppts. since 14-15 in agreement on

parent involvement questions Lagging Indicators

  • School Performance Framework (SPF):

Improved to Priority Improvement from Turnaround in 2016

  • Achievement: Relatively flat; No Change in

SPF points earned since 2016

  • Growth: +7.1 ppts. in SPF points earned

since 2016

  • Grad/Dropout
  • Graduation: +25.7 ppts. since 14-15
  • Drop Out: -4.3 ppts. since 14-15
  • Overall Satisfaction on Stakeholder

Surveys

  • Students: +5 ppts. since 14-15
  • Parents: +4 ppts. since 14-15
  • Licensed staff: +12 ppts. since 14-15
  • Classified: +3 ppts. since 14-15

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Office of Autonomous Schools & ACTION Zone

  • Establishment of Office of Autonomous Schools in 2016,

which oversees the ACTION Zone schools and charter schools

  • OAS Staff support APS’ five State Innovation schools in

implementing their Innovation Plans aligned with the four pillars of the ACTION Zone: – Create a Climate and Culture for International Leadership – Focus on Student-Centered Data Driven Instruction – Develop a Comprehensive Talent Strategy – Develop Strong Family and Community Partnerships

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

2017 State-Directed Innovation Pathway

18 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

2017 State-Directed Innovation Pathway

19 19

  • Culture of Performance
  • Culture & Climate
  • Family & Community

Partnerships

  • Student Pathways & Post-

Secondary Readiness

  • Educational Program
  • International Leadership
  • Competency-Based Instruction
  • Human Capital
  • Retention & Compensation
  • Recruitment & Hiring
  • Evaluation
  • Onboarding, PD, Coaching and

Job-Embedded Supports

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

2017 State-Directed External Management Partner Pathway

20 20

Mass Insight would serve as a targeted External Management Partner for a minimum of the 2017-18 school year focused on:

  • Innovation Implementation Support. MIE will focus on developing systems and

processes for schools to improve academic systems, to find school-based approaches to further strengthen the culture of performance, and to manage talent effectively at all five ACTION Zone schools.

  • Autonomy Implementation Support. MIE will be tasked with leading a project to

ensure all ACTION Zone schools start the 2017-18 school year with clear implementation pathways for all critical autonomies.

  • Performance Management Support. MIE will be tasked with developing school- and

Zone- capacity to manage critical projects at ACHS and the other schools in the ACTION Zone.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Aurora Central High School Pathways Implementation

  • Created a culture of Performance. Implemented systems and structures and staffing strategies that

have led to improved leading indicators in:

  • student attendance, behavior incidents, overall satisfaction, parent involvement, student/teacher

relationships, ICAP's, students accessing credentials, and increased graduation rate (+26 ppts.), and decreased dropout rates (-4.3 ppts.).

  • Implemented a House Model. Improved student culture, relationships, attendance, and student

behavior.

  • Implemented Home Visit program. Pivoting to Parents In Action (PIA) to increase parent engagement.
  • Strategic Staffing and Support Staff. Address student attendance and support post-secondary coaching.
  • Implementation of Enrichment and Aurora Central Career Academy (ACCA). Address credit recovery

and dropout.

  • Professional Learning and Talent Development. Supports content and grade-level alignment to state

standards and creates a culture of teacher support.

  • Tiered Teacher Coaching system/structure. Improves teacher practice, creates a culture of teacher

support, and improves teacher retention rates.

  • Partnered with Mass Insight. Created Professional Learning Community and Professional Development

systems and structures.

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

22

Parents in Action

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

23

Parents in Action Create an Authentic Voice for Parents

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

24

Parents in Action: Create an authentic voice for parents

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

25

Parents in ACTION: ACHS Outcomes

Parents In Action: year 1

  • ACHS Communities of Burma PIA made a YouTube station on common gaps in

knowledge of US Schools

  • ACHS Nepali PIA Hosted seminars on requested topics
  • PIA conducted outreach for Parent Climate survey in 19-20SY
  • PIA program awarded 35k per year of CAO navigation services (total of 5 years)
  • APS Presented Parents in Action @ National FCE Conference in July

2018-19 2019-2020 25 parent leaders trained Currently 34 parents active in PIA meetings 3 active groups: Nepali, Communities of Burma, and Spanish PIA program is expanding at ACHS. The Community School Coordinator and Family Liaison are mobilizing in Somali, Swahili, and English communities for 19-20SY launch 100% of parent leaders indicated they feel connected to their school community in the PIA post survey PIA hosted feedback sessions for ACHS parents to engage in APS’ Accountability Hearing recommendation

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

26

I feel welcomed in my child’s school. 70.8% to 89.3% (+18.5%) The teachers and staff in my child’s school respect the different cultures that are represented in the community. 70.8% to 92.2% (+21.4) I find that the school’s staff is able to meet with me when I need to discuss my child’s progress. 62.5% to 89.8% (+27.3%) The school provides me with the opportunity to give input on the school’s programs and goals. 50% to 80.9% (+30.9%) If needed, the school provides me with information on local agencies and

  • ther community support.

55% to 87.2% (+32.2%) The school provides me with many opportunities to plan and participate in the school’s activities. 54.1% to 84.6% (+30.5%) I can be involved in school improvement planning and decision making at my child’s school. 29% to 86.7% (+57.7%)

Comparing 2017-18 to 2018-19 ACHS Parent Climate Survey Data

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Parent Voice

Knyaw Mu Parent of: 2 current Aurora Central students in 11th and 12th grades 6 students in other ACTION Zone schools

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Aurora Central’s Innovation Plan Moving Forward

28 28

Moving forward, ACHS will continue to leverage its Innovation Plan to:

  • Continue to improve school culture through sustained implementation of House Model,

Attendance Strategy, Parent Engagement

  • Continue the work with Mass Insight to build ACHS Instructional Leadership capacity and

strengthen collaborative structures for teachers

  • Continue to implement professional learning and Professional Learning Community (PLC)

structures with opportunities to strengthen alignment and effectiveness

  • Strengthen teacher coaching particularly related to teaching to grade-level standards and rigor

and development of common formative assessments

  • Develop intentional recruitment and retention strategy
  • Further align International Leadership Focus with curriculum
  • Further develop MTSS system within House Model to address tiered academic and behavioral

needs

  • Strengthen supports for English Language Learners
  • Enhance approach to Pathways and Post-Secondary readiness
  • Monitor on-track and college and career readiness indicators
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

APS Board Approved Recommendation for ACHS

Recommendation: Continue the Innovation Pathway, previously directed by the State Board, by continuing to implement its existing Innovation Plan; Identify additional

  • pportunities to support identified areas of need

Rationale:

  • CDE has indicated that ACHS has been implementing its plan with fidelity.
  • ACHS has demonstrated improvements in leading indicators that are necessary to lay the foundation for

improved academic outcomes, and lagging indicators, such as graduation rates and dropout rates.

  • ACHS Leadership has established structures to support improved culture and academic performance that

need to be sustained to see improved academic improvements.

  • Consistent with the research, ACHS needs additional time to implement its Innovation Plan in order to see

improvements in lagging indicators such as achievement and address additional areas for improvement.

  • Changing ACHS’ existing Pathway would create significant disruption to the progress that has occurred

and is likely to set ACHS back, needing to re-establish a new culture, expectations, and systems.

  • Areas for improvement, such as those to provide increased support for students with disabilities, English

Language Learners, and students not meeting grade level standards, need to be addressed within the context of the existing approach and structures that ACHS has established to ensure consistency, coherence, and alignment.

  • APS has demonstrated its ability and capacity to drive district turnaround and school turnaround through

use of the Pathway models.

  • Closure is not a viable option, given that APS does not have capacity at other high schools for the ~2000

students currently enrolled at Central.

  • Charter conversion is not a viable option for a large, comprehensive high school.

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Every Student Shapes a Successful Future

Thank You!

30