Attractor Models of Cortical Computations (Working) Memory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

attractor models of cortical computations working memory
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Attractor Models of Cortical Computations (Working) Memory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Master of Integrative Biology Neuroscience UE 5BN04 2018-19 Attractor Models of Cortical Computations (Working) Memory Gianluigi Mongillo Center for Neurophysics, Physiology and Pathology Paris Descartes University CNRS UMR 8119


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Attractor Models

  • f

Cortical Computations

Master of Integrative Biology Neuroscience – UE 5BN04

2018-19 Gianluigi Mongillo

Center for Neurophysics, Physiology and Pathology Paris Descartes University – CNRS UMR 8119

(Working) Memory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Learning/Memory

Learning – process by which relatively permanent changes occur in behavioral potential as a result of experience. Memory – relatively permanent record of the experience that under- lies learning. Learning – acquiring new knowledge from experience Memory – retention of the acquired knowledge over time Internal representations

modification stabilization

neurons synapses

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Models of Behavior

How do organisms select appropriate behavior?

stimulus response

reactive

“In mammals even as low as the rat it has turned out to be impossible to describe behavior as an interaction directly between sensory and motor processes” (Hebb, 1949)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Models of Behavior

How do organisms select appropriate behavior?

stimulus response

reactive

“In mammals even as low as the rat it has turned out to be impossible to describe behavior as an interaction directly between sensory and motor processes” (Hebb, 1949)

stimulus response internal representations

cognitive

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Cell Assembly Hypothesis

“Let us assume that the persistence or repetition of a reverberatory activity (or 'trace') tends to induce lasting cellular changes that add to its stability...”

  • Perceptive experience activates sub-populations in neuronal assemblies,

by increasing/decreasing firing rates.

  • Pairs of activated cells potentiate synapses between them, while synapses

from activated to non-activated cells are depressed.

  • The resulting cell assembly is able to sustain a pattern of activity similar to

the perceptive one in absence of the eliciting stimulus. (Hebb, 1949)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Hebb Framework

sensory motor association areas

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Hebb Framework

sensory motor association areas

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Hebb Framework

sensory motor association areas

reverberatory activity

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The Hebb Framework

sensory motor association areas

reverberatory activity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Hebb Framework

sensory motor association areas

reverberatory activity

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Working Memory (WM)

cue delay period correct error

Delayed-response paradigm

test

Object Memory WM refers to the mechanism(s) underlying the maintenance of task-relevant information while performing the task. Items in WM are available in a special status, which makes them able to drive/control behavior (active maintenance).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

+ + + + + + + + + + + +

correct saccade

cue delay period test

Spatial Memory

Working Memory (WM) Delayed-response paradigm

WM refers to the mechanism(s) underlying the maintenance of task-relevant information while performing the task. Items in WM are available in a special status, which makes them able to drive/control behavior (active maintenance).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

DMS task and Delay Activity

(adapted from Meyer et al., 2007)

cue delay period correct error test cue delay period

slide-14
SLIDE 14

cue delay period correct error test cue delay period

DMS task and Delay Activity

(adapted from Meyer et al., 2007)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

cue delay period cue delay period correct error test

DMS task and Delay Activity

(adapted from Meyer et al., 2007)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

(adapted from Funahashi et al., 1989)

ODR task and Delay Activity

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Different Delay's Durations

(adapted from Funahashi et al., 1989)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Delay Activity During Error Trials

(adapted from Funahashi et al., 1989)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Mechanistic Accounts

Active maintenance as a result of the collective network dynamics Active maintenance as a result changes in single-cell excitability Active maintenance as a result of short-term modifications

  • f synaptic efficacies
slide-20
SLIDE 20

external input r e c u r r e n t c

  • n

n e c t i v i t y neuronal population

Hebbian assembly

(Hebb, 1949; Amit, 1995)

activity time time activity

spontaneous activity memory activity

'active maintenance' through reverberatory activity

The Cell Assembly Hypothesis

slide-21
SLIDE 21

cue period delay period

Persistent Activity and Network Multi-Stability

+ + + + + + + +

slide-22
SLIDE 22

cue period delay period

Persistent Activity and Network Multi-Stability

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A Toy Model

external input r e c u r r e n t c

  • n

n e c t i v i t y neuronal population

Hebbian assembly

Si(t)=0,1

Si(t)=

0 otherwise 1 if I i(t)≥1 I i(t)=μext+ σext⋅ηi(t)+∑ j Jij S j(t−1)

all-to-all connected: Jij=J/N

slide-24
SLIDE 24

A Toy Model

external input r e c u r r e n t c

  • n

n e c t i v i t y neuronal population

Hebbian assembly

Si(t)=0,1

Si(t)=

0 otherwise 1 if I i(t)≥1 I i(t)=μext+ σext⋅ηi(t)+∑ j Jij S j(t−1)

all-to-all connected: Jij=J/N

ν(t)= 1 N ∑i Si(t) Φ(ν)= 1

√2π∫1−μext−J ν

σext ∞

dx e

−x

2/2

ν(t+ 1)=Φ[ν(t)]

with

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Bi-Stability through Positive Feedback

ν(t) ν(t+ 1)

0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0

slide-26
SLIDE 26

ν(t)

0.5 1.0

ν(t+ 1)

0.5 1.0

Bi-Stability through Positive Feedback

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ν(t)

0.5 1.0

ν(t+ 1)

0.5 1.0

Bi-Stability through Positive Feedback

slide-28
SLIDE 28

ν(t)

0.5 1.0

ν(t+ 1)

0.5 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1

Bi-Stability through Positive Feedback

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Realistic Models with Spiking Neurons

(Amit & Brunel, 1997; Brunel, 2000)

Network Architecture Single-cell Dynamics

slide-30
SLIDE 30

AB Model: Population Activities

(Brunel, 2000)

sel.

  • ther sel.

non sel. inhib.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

AB Model: Single-Cell Spiking Patterns

sel.

  • ther sel.

non sel. inhib.

(Brunel, 2000)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

(adapted from Lisman & Idiart, 1995)

Through Single-Cell Properties

Firing is sustained by increased membrane excitability which is refreshed through network oscillations ADP time course

Acetylcholine Serotonin

V (t)=V osc(t)+V ADP(t)−V inh(t)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

(adapted from Lisman & Idiart, 1995)

Through Single-Cell Properties

Firing is sustained by increased membrane excitability which is refreshed through network oscillations ADP time course

Acetylcholine Serotonin

V (t)=V osc(t)+V ADP(t)−V inh(t)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

(adapted from Lisman & Idiart, 1995)

Through Single-Cell Properties

Firing is sustained by increased membrane excitability which is refreshed through network oscillations ADP time course

Acetylcholine Serotonin

V (t)=V osc(t)+V ADP(t)−V inh(t)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

(adapted from Lisman & Idiart, 1995)

Through Single-Cell Properties

Firing is sustained by increased membrane excitability which is refreshed through network oscillations ADP time course

Acetylcholine Serotonin

V (t)=V osc(t)+V ADP(t)−V inh(t)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

(adapted from Lisman & Idiart, 1995)

Through Single-Cell Properties

Sternberg effect (1966)

Response time increase linearly with the nr. of items in memory

slide-37
SLIDE 37

(adapted from Lisman & Idiart, 1995)

Through Single-Cell Properties

Sternberg effect (1966)

Response time increase linearly with the nr. of items in memory

Nested oscillations (slow/fast)

Observed both in cortex and hippocampus:

  • segment information in time
  • time compression (for associations)
slide-38
SLIDE 38