astro aapm radiation oncology incident learning system ro
play

ASTRO/AAPM Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System (ROILS) Todd - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ASTRO/AAPM Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System (ROILS) Todd Pawlicki, Ph.D. Dept of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences University of California, San Diego Joint IAEA-ICTP training on patient safety in radiotherapy Trieste,


  1. ASTRO/AAPM Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System (RO•ILS) Todd Pawlicki, Ph.D. Dept of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences University of California, San Diego Joint IAEA-ICTP training on patient safety in radiotherapy Trieste, Italy 24 – 28 November, 2014

  2. ASTRO’s 6-Point Plan 1. Create a database for RT error reporting 2. Develop a new practice accreditation program 3. Expand quality and safety education/training 4. Develop tools for patients 5. Further develop interconnectivity compliance 6. Advocate for expanded legislation

  3. Why create a national ILS? 1 Incident: March 2005 Public knowledge: January 2010 2 Incident: March 2008 Public knowledge: September 2013

  4. Other Benefits of an ILS • Safety improvement (data-based) • Better insight into processes – “I did not know that!” • Resource and effort allocation • Whether or not quality/safety interventions work • Positive staff experience

  5. A National U.S. Error Database • Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act – Signed into law July 29, 2005 – Share information about patient safety events without liability – Allowed for the creation of Patient Safety Organizations (PSOs)

  6. Patient Safety Organization (PSO) • An entity listed by AHRQ that meets PSQIA requirements • A way to operationalize the PSQIA for healthcare entities www.claritygrp.com

  7. The ASTRO/AAPM System PSO: Patient Safety Organization PSWP: Patient Safety Work Product Analysis PSES: Patient Safety Evaluation System and Reports National Safety Alerts and Reports Provider Database Analytics Send and Analysis to Database by RO-HAC PSO Provider’s PSES Clarity PSO PSES

  8. RO•ILS Home Page

  9. RO•ILS Event Submission

  10. RO•ILS Event Submission

  11. RO•ILS Follow-up • Identify contributing factors • Add additional information • Record corrective actions

  12. Status of the RO• ILS • Released June 19, 2014 • Beta testing began in September 2013 • 19 signed contracts covering 26 sites* • 29 contracts pending (will add an additional 41 sites) * • Academic and community centers • Currently free to ASTRO and AAPM members • Rad Onc Healthcare Advisory Council (RO-HAC) • MD, PhDs, RTT, Administrator • Procedures still in progress … *as of 9 September 9 2014

  13. Encourage All Reporting • Major events • Minor frequent events • Near-misses • Unsafe/Unexpected conditions

  14. as of 15 October 2014 Percentage total responses 45% 43% N = 145 40% 33% 35% 30% 23% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 1% 0% Incident Near-miss Unsafe condition Not patient related

  15. as of 15 October 2014 Who reported the event? (percentage total responses) Radiation Therapist 32% Physicist 28% Dosimetrist 14% Administrator 8% Attending Radiation Oncologist 2% N = 145 Other 1% Resident Radiation Oncologist 1% Other Physician 1% Unknown 13% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

  16. as of 15 October 2014 Type of Event (total count) 160 139 140 120 N = 145 100 80 60 40 20 4 2 0 External Beam Other Brachytherapy

  17. as of 15 October 2014 Treatment Technique (total count) 3D 49 IMRT 20 2D 11 Other 9 SBRT 6 Electrons 5 Modulated Arc 4 N = 145 Total Body Irradiation (TBI) 2 Cranial SRT/SRS 1 HDR 1 Intracavitary 1 Protons or other particles 1 Not Applicable 1 Unknown 43 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

  18. as of 15 October 2014 Did event occur with other patients? (percentage total responses) 70% N = 145 57% 60% 50% 40% 30% 30% 20% 12% 10% 0% No Yes Unknown

  19. Successful Incident Learning 20 • Part of quality/safety improvement program – Explicit support from leadership • System for reporting and guidelines – Share data and provide feedback • Competence to interpret reported data – Ability to make process changes • Appropriate organizational culture – Reporting and Just cultures

  20. Organizational Culture • Shared values and beliefs produce behavioral norms – Shared values → What is important – Shared beliefs → How things work • Safety culture – Reporting culture – Just culture

  21. Reporting Culture • Efficient method to submit all event types • Indemnity against retribution for reporting • Separate data collection from those with authority to discipline • Feedback to the reporting community

  22. Just Culture • Not all errors result from acceptable actions • Blanket immunity is not appropriate • Establish performance standards and expectations of behavior

  23. Summary • RO-ILS is a national incident learning system for the U.S. • Should be implemented within the appropriate organizational culture

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend