the role of checklists on improving safety in radiation
play

The Role of Checklists on Improving Safety in Radiation Oncology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Role of Checklists on Improving Safety in Radiation Oncology Luis E. Fong de los Santos, Ph.D. April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting Learning Objectives Understand the role of checklists as a safety management tool Recognize the


  1. The Role of Checklists on Improving Safety in Radiation Oncology Luis E. Fong de los Santos, Ph.D. April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  2. Learning Objectives • Understand the role of checklists as a safety management tool • Recognize the importance of the organization and department culture on checklists success • Describe the checklists development and implementation process • Review the standard components and format of safety checklists April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  3. Airline Industry Medical Industry Number of people visiting a Number of people flying per year medical facility per year (Globally) (USA) 3.1 billion 1.24 billion Fatalities from Preventable Fatalities per year: Medical Mistakes per year 692 200,000 to 450,000 http://aviation-safety.net/ James JT, Journal of Patient Safety, 2013 April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  4. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/us/27RADIATIONSIDEBAR.html?ref=us http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/24/health/24radiation.html April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  5. Rischin et al. JCO, 28(18), 2989, 2010 April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  6. Quality and Outcomes Peters et al. JCO, 28(18), 2996, 2010 April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  7. Checklists - Background • Checklists have been extensively validated in non-medical and medical fields for many years, and have proven to be an effective tool in error management and a key instrument in reducing the risk of costly mistakes and improving overall outcomes. Boeing 2012 April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  8. Checklists - Background • Pronovost P, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine 2006 – Reducing hospital-acquired infection rates by 70%. • Haynes AB, et al. A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population. New England Journal of Medicine 2009 – Improved compliance with standards of care by 65% and reduced surgical mortality by nearly 50% • What about Radiation Oncology ? April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  9. TG-230 / MPPG-4 The Development, Implementation, Use and Maintenance of Safety Checklists Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD (Consultant) Start: 6/26/2012 April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  10. Human Tasks and Error • Tasks requiring schematic behavior, in other words done “on autopilot” – Error Type: Slips or Omissions. They are associated with lapses of concentration, distractions, exhaustion or burnout • Tasks requiring attentional behavior, which need a predefined active plan and problem-solving skills – Error Type: Mistakes. Often occurring due to lack of experience, poor training, poor judgment or misunderstanding a situation April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  11. Role of Checklists in Error Management • Basic memory guides those tasks that are easily forgotten; allowing the team to concentrate on tasks that require full attention (Gawande 2009) • Checklists function as a supporting interface among individuals, and between individuals and their environment (Patient Safety Primers: Checklists) April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  12. April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  13. Sociocultural Component of Checklists • The mistake of the “ simple checklist ” story is in the assumption that a technical solution (checklist) can solve an adaptive (sociocultural) problem. ” (Bosk et al. 2009) April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  14. Hazard Mitigation Effectiveness Most Effective Hazard Mitigation Effectiveness o Forcing Functions and Constraints o Automation and Computerization o Simplification and Standardization o Reminders and Checklists Least Effective o Policies and Procedures o Training and Education Human Factor Institute for Safe Medical Practices, Vaida et al. 1999 April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  15. April 2015 Forcing Function NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  16. Checklists • Procedure • Process • System • Motivation • Perception • Interpretation • Discipline • Fatigue • Distraction • Compliance • Mood • Cooperation • Etc. April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  17. Drill Bench Drill Bit + April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  18. Checklist in Airline Industry Checklists + Crew Resource Management (CRM) CRM focuses on: interpersonal communication, leadership, and decision making April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  19. Checklist in Medical Industry Checklists + Safety Culture Factors of Safety Culture (Pidgeon and O'Leary) : • Commitment of upper level management to safety • Shared attitudes towards safety and hazards • Flexible norms and rules to deal with hazardous situations • Organizational learning April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  20. Checklists – Where do I start? • Find areas or processes with: – The strongest evidence on quality improvement and safety – Have the highest clinical impact – Have the lowest barriers for implementation and utilization • Selection process should concentrate on: – Tasks that are critical, often missed and overlooked – Tasks that can potentially put the patient at the highest risk for harm if not done or done incorrectly • Note: Poor selection or ambiguity on the checklist goal, role or tasks will most likely lead to failure on the checklist intervention April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  21. Achievable Goals for Checklists • Compliance improvement of clinical protocols, procedures and processes • Reduction of near-misses in critical clinical processes • Enhancement of communication and team dynamic • Improve practice standardization • Streamline workflow April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  22. Checklist Development and Implementation Process Clinical Need and Evidence- Based Best Practices Designing Phase Content and Format Definition Validation and Pilot Phase Pre-Clinical Implementation Training Outcomes and Performance Evaluation Maintenance and Continuous Improvement TG-230 – in progress April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  23. Simple versus Complex Environments and Processes Single physicist practice with one linac and developing a checklist for setting water tank • Multidisciplinary group developing a checklist for a specialized procedure • Examples: SBRT, SRS, Brachytherapy. • Large practice developing a checklist for pre-treatment physics plan check April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  24. Gather the Team • Team approach should be used throughout all the phases of development, implementation and maintenance of a specific checklist April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  25. Human Factors Engineering (HFE) • HFE uses knowledge about human characteristics, both capabilities and limitations that are relevant during any designing process and aims to optimize the interactions among people, machines, procedures, systems and environments • Checklist design recommendations can be classified into three main areas: – Physical Characteristics – Content – Workflow, Layout and Format “We cannot change the human condition, but we can change the conditions under which humans work.”- James Reason April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  26. HFE - Poor vs Good Design Norman, D. A. (2013). Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded. New York: Basic Books. London: MIT Press April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  27. Poor Improved (a) BEFORE INCISION (a) PRE ‐ INCISION All items must be verbally verified by (b) patient and nurse  Patient has confirmed: CHECK BOOLD PRESS ‐ (b) Site ‒ ‐ URE Identity ‒ ALLERGIES? Procedure ‒ Consent (a) (c) CHECK PULSE ‒  Site marked or not CHECK MEDICATION applicable (d) USE (IF YES, SEE CHECKLIST PAGE c ‐ 112) Allergies VERIFY SITE, (c)  Yes (list) (f)  No IDENTITY, (e)  Pulse oximeter in place PROCEDURE, and working CONSENT (d) Poor Designed: Improved Designed: a) Use of “pre” may look similar to “post”. Before and After are Overall flow moves from questions that need patient input and less likely to be confused confirmation to actions that need to be confirmed by nursing b) Vague question; unknown what a check here would mean team. Whitespaces and changes in font act as visual cues for flow c) Boxes are low contrast. Far removed from the action they refer through the checklist and completeness. to a) High contrast text d) Lack of whitespace & use of caps decreases readability b) Responsibility assigned e) Listed actions not clearly separated c) Outcome of allergy questioning is clear; environmental f) Creates undue load on memory, both in keeping the current support added by having allergens recorded checklist in mind while looking at another page and in the d) Raised boxes draw attention and shadow gives additional lengthy wording: “CHECKLIST PAGE c ‐ 112” contrast McLaughlin, A. C. (2010). What Makes a Good Checklist. In, (AHRQ) - http://www.webmm.ahrq.gov/perspective.aspx?perspectiveID=92 April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  28. Atul Gawande ’ s website Project Check (http://www.projectcheck.org/checklist-for-checklists.html) April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  29. April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  30. Operating Room Crisis Checklist - Brigham and Women's Hospital - http://www.projectcheck.org/crisis-checklist-templates.html April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

  31. Group at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center April 2015 NCC-AAPM SPRING Meeting

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend