assessment of counseling services
play

Assessment of Counseling Services: How Does Counseling Fit Into The - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ACCA National Conference 1 February 24, 2018 Charlotte, NC Assessment of Counseling Services: How Does Counseling Fit Into The Mission Of Student Affairs? Perry C. Francis, Ed.D., LPC, ACS ACCA Representative to CAS Professor of Counseling


  1. ACCA National Conference 1 February 24, 2018 Charlotte, NC Assessment of Counseling Services: How Does Counseling Fit Into The Mission Of Student Affairs? Perry C. Francis, Ed.D., LPC, ACS ACCA Representative to CAS Professor of Counseling Eastern Michigan University pfrancis@emich.edu

  2. How many of you… 2 • Work in a counseling center? • Work in another student affairs area? • Work somewhere else at your institution? • Have looked at the CAS Standards for at least one functional area? • Have participated in a department/program review process using CAS standards? • Have used CAS standards for other purposes?

  3. Official Participant Outcomes 3 • To list and describe the CAS Standards & Guidelines for use in analysis of College Counseling services. • To analyze CAS Standards and functional areas (College Counseling) for use in creating plans for improvement, expansion, or demonstrating efficacy of services. • To use CAS standards to design tools for data collection to discuss and explain impact of services on student body. • To create or develop assessment tools aligned with CAS Standards to create outcome studies for development of strategic goals.

  4. CAS Mission 4 • The mission of the Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS) is to promote the improvement of programs and services to enhance the quality of student learning and development. • CAS is a consortium of professional associations who work collaboratively to develop and promulgate standards and guidelines and to encourage self-assessment.

  5. CAS Overview 5 • Based in philosophy of self-assessment • 41 member associations • 43 sets of functional area standards – Developing standards that are cross functional (have two or more departments) • Standards of practice informed by wide range of professionals and approved by consensus • Self-assessment guides (SAGs) for program self-study • 30+ years of history; span across higher education

  6. Uses of CAS Standards 6 • Credibility, Accountability, Improvement – Program & service improvement – Measures of quality and effectiveness – Measures of impact on learning and development – Design of new programs & services – Institutional self-studies – Preparation for accreditation or program review • Staff development • Academic preparation

  7. Standards & Guidelines 7 Understanding Standards and Guidelines Standards Guidelines Indispensible Requirements Clarify & Amplify Standards Achievable by any & all Guide enhanced practice programs of quality beyond essential function Appear in Appear in light-faced type Bold type Use verbs Use verbs Must & Shall Should & May

  8. 12 Component Parts 8 1. Mission 7. Diversity, Equity, & Access 2. Program 8. Institutional & External Relations 3. Organization & Leadership 9. Financial Resources 4. Human Resources 10. Technology 5. Ethics 11. Facilities & Equipment 6. Law, Policy, & Governance 12. Assessment & Evaluation

  9. General & Specialty Standards 9 General Standards Specialty Standards • Address issues specific to the • Common across all functional areas functional area • For Example: • For Example: • Programs & services must develop, • The primary mission of career services disseminate, implement, and regularly is to assist students and other review their mission. designated clients through all phases of their career development.

  10. Student Learning & Development: 10 Part of the Program • Programs and services must: – Assess relevant and desirable student learning and development – Provide evidence of impact on outcomes – Articulate contributions to or support of student learning and development in the domains specifically assessed – Articulate contributions to or support of student persistence and success – Use evidence gathered through this process to create strategies for improvement of programs and services

  11. Outcome Domains 11 • Knowledge Acquisition, Construction, Integration, and Application • Cognitive Complexity • Intrapersonal Development • Interpersonal Competence • Humanitarianism and Civic Engagement • Practical Competence

  12. Domain Example: 12 Intrapersonal Development Dimensions • Realistic self-appraisal, self-understanding, and self-respect • Identity development • Commitment to ethics and integrity • Spiritual awareness Examples of Learning Outcomes • SELF : Assesses, articulates, and acknowledges personal skills, abilities, and growth areas; uses self-knowledge to make decisions such as those related to career choices; articulates rationale for personal behavior; seeks and considers feedback from others; critiques and subsequently learns from past experiences; employs self-reflection to gain insight; functions without need for constant reassurance from others; balances needs of self with needs of others • IDENTITY : Integrates multiple aspects of identity into a coherent whole; recognizes and exhibits interdependence; recognizes and exhibits interdependence in accordance with cultural and personal values; identifies and commits to important aspects of self • INTEGRITY : Incorporates ethical reasoning into action; explores and articulates the values and principles involved in personal decision- making; acts in congruence with personal values and beliefs; exemplifies dependability, honesty, and trustworthiness; accepts personal accountability • SPIRITUAL : Develops and articulates personal belief system; understands roles of spirituality in personal and group values and behaviors; critiques, compares, and contrasts various belief systems; explores issues of purpose, meaning, and faith

  13. Standards & Outcomes 13 • Standards serve a purpose in • Some outcomes may be more leading toward intentional salient to a program/service than outcomes others, but all should be on radar • CAS identifies 6 learning and • Critically important to think first developmental outcome domains of desired outcomes & then design programs that will achieve the outcome • Each functional area either directly influences, contributes to, or • Standards, outcomes, assessment makes outcome possible lead us to accountability

  14. Sharing Perspectives 14 • With 2-3 other people… – What are your experiences with using CAS? – What are the benefits? – What are the challenges? – What are your questions? • Report out…

  15. Self-Assessment 15 The CAS Perspective

  16. Program Evaluation 16 • Is the program or service functioning effectively to achieve its mission? • What evidence is available to support the determination? • How is evidence used to make program decisions?

  17. Student Outcomes Assessment 17 • What is the effect of our work on students? • How are they different as a result of interacting with our programs and services? • How do we know? • How do we demonstrate their learning or development? • What and how do we measure?

  18. Balanced Assessment 18 • Current attention focuses on • Important to know both sides: outcomes – Are our programs & services organized and run effectively to – Shift from industrial e economy achieve the intended outcomes? focusing on inputs, consistency of product – Are the intended outcomes achieved? – Shift to the infor ormation on e econ onom omy focuses on outcomes, fit of product – In counseling, are we focused on to consumer (Art Levine) outcomes for individuals or for our overall program/service?

  19. What if…? 19 • What if we just focused on • If we assess both outcomes? programs/services and the actual outcomes, we can make more informed determinations about – If we always achieve the intended what needs to be changed or outcomes, there’s no problem – we keep doing what we’re doing. improved. – If we don’t achieve the intended outcomes, and all that we have assessed is those outcomes, how would we decide what to do differently?

  20. Where to Start?? 20 • Depends on where you are already You Don’t Have • Start where you can To Do It All • Build to a full cycle over time

  21. Barham & Scott, 2006 21

  22. What is the Context? 22 • Institution mission • Institution/division strategic plan • Division/department mission • Professional standards MAPPING How do t these connect t to each o other?

  23. Nature of the Unit 23 • Barham & Scott (2006) suggest that we need to consider the nature of the unit: – Service – Learning – Development • How does that inform our work?

  24. Identifying Outcomes 24 • What should be the result of our work? – Program outcomes • e.g., % of students reached – Operational outcomes • e.g., reduced wait-list time to appointment – Student outcomes • e.g., intrapersonal development/integrity/ethical decision-making

  25. Identifying Strategies 25 • What will we do intentionally to try to achieve these outcomes? – Outreach/programming (active & passive) – Policies & procedures – Environmental factors – Short term & long term

  26. How Will We Know? 26 • Realize that not every outcome • Decide how to measure them as needs to be measured, not every you are designing the intervention outcome can be measured, & not every outcome should be • Carry out your plan & use the measured results to improve the next cycle • Design intended outcomes & objectives to be assessed so that they are measurable

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend