Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code: BM202 Unit - - PDF document

assessment details and submission guidelines
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code: BM202 Unit - - PDF document

Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd CRICOS Provider No: 01545C, 03245K NSW Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Unit Code: BM202 Unit Title: Organisational Development Assessment Type: Individual Assignment Assessment Title:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

@MIT March, 2019 1 Melbourne Institute of Technology Pty Ltd CRICOS Provider No: 01545C, 03245K NSW

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines

Unit Code: BM202 Unit Title: Organisational Development Assessment Type: Individual Assignment Assessment Title: Presentation of Journal Entries Purpose of the assessment The purpose of this assignment is to assess the following Learning Outcomes:

  • a. Describe the concept of the organisation as a system
  • b. Describe and discuss the major theories and concepts that

pertain to understanding behaviour in organisations

  • c. Examine the role of Organisational Behaviour theory in

enhancing both individual and organisational effectiveness

  • d. Apply knowledge to develop solutions to practical and theoretical

problems Weight: 15% Total Marks: 15% Word limit N/A Release Date: Week 1 Due Date: Week 7 Submission Guidelines:

  • All work must be submitted via Turnitin by the due date along with a

completed Assignment Cover Page.

  • Reflective Journal needs to be submitted on Turnitin as a Word

document.

  • The assignment must be in Power point format.
  • Reference sources must be cited and listed appropriately at the end

in a reference list using APA referencing style. Extension

  • If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special

Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School's Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies- procedures-and-guidelines/specialconsiderationdeferment Presentation or facilitated discussion

  • To be held during tutorial.
  • See assessment marking criteria.
slide-2
SLIDE 2

@MIT March, 2019 2

ASSESSMENT 2 DETAILS: PRESENTATION OF JOURNAL ENTRIES Theories and concepts: Teaching & Learning Materials of weeks 1,2,3, & 4 {Chapter 1,3,4, & 5 of Griffin, et.al (2017)} Length: Presentation 15 minutes; and Documentation of Journal Entries day-to-day for three weeks Number of slides: Max 10 slides (highlights of days in the weeks with actual dates); Journal entries approximately 5 Pages In this assessment you are to individually present a summary of your own reflective journal that you have been recording over at least 3 weeks. In the reflective journal you need to record what you are feeling either highly motivated to achieve something; or not motivated to get moving (substantiate with theories & practices you experienced) or unable to take action, linking the experiences of high and low action or motivation to thoughts, feelings and behaviours at these times. You must provide supportive evidences to link theories to real-practice and experiences. A copy of the journal (referenced and supported as evidence-based) must be handed-in to your lecturer

  • n the day of your presentation. You also need to hand-in your power point slides which are also

referenced and supported with theories from particularly chapters: 1,2,3,4 of Griffin, et al. 2017 and

  • ther suitable journal articles.

Your presentation should explain your motivation levels based on your journal entries which discusses relevant motivational theories/models that has helped you to understand your motivational levels throughout these three weeks as highlights of your experiences. Marking criteria: Marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows: Section to be included in the report Detailed Description of the Criteria Marks Criteria 1 Professionally dressed for the presentation 10 Criteria 2 Completed and submitted journal with suitable and supportive theories to support your analysis and reflection 20 Criteria 3 Journal documentation and discussion with supportive evidences of the summary of three weeks (on day-to-day basis within the context of relevant motivational theories/models). 30 Criteria 4 Creativity of presentation, including effective use of visual aids; Clarity of expression, including voice projection, fluency, proper gestures, eye contact; 30 Criteria 5 Interactive exercise that is relevant to this journal documentation and presentation so as to attract audience

  • interaction. Ability to answer questions & clarifications correctly

10 Total 100

slide-3
SLIDE 3

@MIT March, 2019 3

MARKING RUBRIC FOR ASSIGNMENT

Marking Rubric Criteria/ Grades High Distinction (HD) [Excellent] = or >80% Distinction (D) [Very Good] 70%-79% Credits (C) [Good] 60%-69% Pass (P) [Satisfactory] 50%-59% Fail (N) [Unsatisfactory] <50%

Criteria 1

Outstanding and appropriate language and dressing that is specific to the presentation Very good and appropriate language and dressing that is relevant and very good

  • utlook

Generally relevant and good behavior with well thought outlook Some relevance and briefly presented and

  • utlook.

Is not relevant to the presentation

Criteria 2

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Criteria 3

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Criteria 4

Outstanding creativity with clear logic and easy to follow with rationality and thinking Very good creativity and consistency, logical and convincing. Clear referencing style Mostly creative with consistent logical and convincing. Generally good referencing style Adequate creativity, cohesion and conviction. Sometimes clear referencing style Argument is confused and disjointed and lacks consistency with many errors

Criteria 5

Outstanding exercise and interaction with audience Very good exercise and interaction with audience Good exercise and interaction with audience Fair exercise and interaction with audience Poor or missing exercise and interaction with audience

T1 2019 BM202= 15% Marker’s Name, Date, and Signature: GENERIC COMMENTS: