Assessing Early Retirement of Coal Generation Patrick Barkey, Bureau - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

assessing early retirement of coal generation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Assessing Early Retirement of Coal Generation Patrick Barkey, Bureau - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Assessing Early Retirement of Coal Generation Patrick Barkey, Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Montana The Colstrip Steam Electric 532 workers Station Today $77.4 mill. payroll $187 mill. of coal purchased $25 mill.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Assessing Early Retirement of Coal Generation

Patrick Barkey, Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Montana

slide-2
SLIDE 2

532 workers $77.4 mill. payroll $187 mill. of coal purchased $25 mill. property taxes paid The Colstrip Steam Electric Station Today

slide-3
SLIDE 3

4.9% 8.9% 45.8% 39.2% 1.2% 31.3% 23.8% 30.4% 10.4% 4.0% 23.6% 25.6% 31.2% 15.9% 3.7%

White American Indian Other Hispanic or Latino

$50,000 to $100,000 $100,000 to $200,000 Colstrip Rest of County Montana Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $50,000

Annual Household Income

Source: 2017 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates

Colstrip Rest of County Montana Colstrip Rest of County Montana Colstrip Rest of County Montana Colstrip Rest of County Montana More than $200,000

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Employment, Rosebud County, , 1975-2018

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1980 1990 2000 2010 Thousands

slide-5
SLIDE 5

GDP Per Capit ita by County, , 2015

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Rosebud County

Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Net Generation Total Retail Sales

Million Mwh

16.1 Million Mwh Exports = 47%

Ele lectricity Generatio ion vs. . Consumptio ion

Montana is a Significant Electricity Exporter

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Montana Electricity Generation vs. Consumption, 1990-2014

5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

MWH

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration Generation Consumption Exports

slide-8
SLIDE 8

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Million Mwh Coal Hydroelectric Conventional Natural Gas Other Other Gases Petroleum Wind Wood and Wood Derived Fuels

Montana Ele lectric Generation by Fuel

Montana Electricity Generation by Source

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Electricity Generation by Energy Source, Montana, 2013

Coal, 53.7% Hydroelectric Conventional, 34.8% Natural Gas, 2.2% Other, 1.2% Other Gases, 0.0% Petroleum, 1.7% Wind, 6.3% Wood and Wood Derived Fuels, 0.0% Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Located in Rosebud County in eastern Montana
  • Employs 532 workers (including contractors),

supports $77.4 million payroll, purchases $187 million in coal annually

  • Produced 13,338 GWH of electricity in 2017
  • Receives coal via a 4.2 mile conveyor belt from the

adjacent Rosebud mine owned by Westermoreland Coal Company

  • Consists of Units 1 and 2, constructed in the 1970s,

with 307 MW capacity each, and Units 3 and 4, completed in the 1980s, with 740 MW of capacity each

Basic Facts About the Colstrip Steam Electric Station

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Considered impacts
  • f ongoing operations
  • Close linkages to the

Westmoreland mine

  • 3,740 jobs
  • $362 million in

personal income

  • $94.6 million in state

and local tax revenue

  • Examined impact of

policy targeting coal- fired electric plants nationwide

  • Considered shutdown

scenario for Colstrip

  • Significant new

investment

  • Job impacts peak at

more than 7,000

  • Closure of Units 1 and

2 now in the baseline

  • Options for remaining

Colstrip units not embedded in national policy

  • Replacement

generation scenarios changing

2010 Study CPP Study (2015) 2018 Study

BBER Colstrip Studies

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Explaining Colstrip’s Outsized Economic Role

  • Because of Colstrip, Montana is a significant energy exporter
  • Colstrip employees are highly productive, highly compensated
  • Colstrip spends a high fraction of its budget on a made-in-Montana

product, namely, coal

  • Coal and energy production/transmission have an outsized impact on

state and local tax revenues

  • Colstrip’s role in the electric grid is not easily replaced
slide-13
SLIDE 13

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4

Talen PSE PGE Avista PacifiCorp NorthWestern

Six Owners: O One Montana, One Unregulated

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Analysis of the Future of Colstrip

Units 1-4 Units 3 & 4 Only All Units Shut Down Today 2022 2027 2043 Compare these two

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What’s Changed About Colstrip’s Future Economic Role?

  • Closure of Units 1 and 2 by year 2022 reduce the size of the facility by

about 35 percent

  • Wholesale electricity markets reflect increased penetration of power

from renewables

  • Political consensus (without an economic model) to keep 500 kv

transmission line from Colstrip to Townsend open

  • Nature of new investments needed in a post-Colstrip era continues to

evolve

  • Nothing has changed about the basic facts of the facility’s outsized

economic contributions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Montana’s Power Geography

NorthWestern Energy Transmission Assets

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Colstrip 3 & 4 Early Retirement Scenario

  • Units 3 & 4 close July 2027:

279 Talen employees 125 Contractors $56.7 mill. Total compensation $277.6 mill. Output

  • Westmoreland Mine Closes July 2027

289 employees and contractors $32 mill. Compensation $140 mill. Output

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Colstrip 3 & 4 Early Retirement Scenario

  • Tax Contributions of the Facilities
  • Site remediation
  • Replacement Investment
  • Impacts on large “choice” customers in Montana
  • Impacts on regional electricity prices
slide-20
SLIDE 20

REMI I Policy Vari riables (e (example)

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 5,000
  • 4,000
  • 3,000
  • 2,000
  • 1,000

1,000

2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043

The Economic Impact of Early Retirement of Colstrip Units 3 and 4 Employment Compared to No Retirement Baseline

Jobs

Maximum Difference from Baseline = 3,752 jobs

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Economic Impact of Early Retirement of Colstrip Units 3 & 4 Impacts Summary Category Units Impact for the Year Full Period* 2028 2043 2028-43 Total Employment Jobs

  • 3,078
  • 2,840
  • 3,280

Personal Income $ Millions

  • 253.2
  • 348.6
  • 5,233.9

Disposable Pers. Income $ Millions

  • 218.3
  • 305.3
  • 4,559.2

Selected State Revenues $ Millions

  • 60.5
  • 81.7
  • 1,242.5

Output $ Millions

  • 700.4
  • 779.4
  • 12,503.3

Population People

  • 1,715
  • 7,016
  • 5,960

*Full period impacts for employment and population are averages of the annual impacts, 2028-43. Full period impact for income, output and revenues are the sum of the annual impacts.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Mining, -300 Construction, -337 Manufacturing, -21 Wholesale Trade, -24 Retail Trade, -336 Transportation and Warehousing, -25 Professional and Technical Services, -51 Utilities, -415 Health Care and Social Assistance, - 159 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation, -15 Accommodation and Food Services, -194 Other Services, except Public Administration,

  • 84

Other Private, -110 State and Local Government, -1211

The Economic Impact of Early Retirement of Colstrip Units 3 and 4 Employment Impacts by Industry, 2028-43 Average

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Im Implications for the Future

  • Coal-fired electricity generation is a big economic driver for

Montana

  • The future of coal – what is the baseline?
  • Integration of individual facilities into the systems need to

be considered