Arm skin water assessed via 300 MHz tissue dielectric constant (TDC) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

arm skin water assessed via 300 mhz tissue dielectric
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Arm skin water assessed via 300 MHz tissue dielectric constant (TDC) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Arm skin water assessed via 300 MHz tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measurements: Dependence on total body water, fat and arm muscle mass R. Desfor and H.N. Mayrovitz mayrovit@nova.edu Nova Southeastern University Background Skin TDC values


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Arm skin water assessed via 300 MHz tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measurements: Dependence on total body water, fat and arm muscle mass

  • R. Desfor and H.N. Mayrovitz

mayrovit@nova.edu Nova Southeastern University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • Skin TDC values depend on free and bound

water in the tissue

  • TDC values have been used to help detect

lymphedema associated with breast cancer treatment and to evaluate other edematous conditions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Unilateral lymphedema

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Unilateral lymphedema

  • When only one arm is affected, we have a

normal arm to use as a control

  • These TDC arm ratios can be used to screen

patients who may be at risk for developing lymphedema

  • TDC arm ratios are not helpful for bilateral

cases

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bilateral lymphadema

  • How do we evaluate a patient

without a “control” limb?

We must use absolute TDC values

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What parameters are quantifiably linked to TDC values?

  • We believe that tissue water likely varies with

total body fat and water

  • Until now, there has been no systemic

determination of possible TDC dependencies

  • n percentages of total body water (TBW%),

total body fat (FAT%), arm muscle mass (MM)

  • r percentage arm fat (FATARM%)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methods

SUBJECTS:

  • 30 male and 30 female adult seated subjects
  • Age 28.0 ± 9.8 years
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Measurements:

  • Bilateral anterior forearm and bicep TDC

measurements to depths of 1.5 and 2.5 mm below the epidermis to determine tissue water

MoistureMeterD: Small 1.5 mm probe Medium 2.5 mm probe

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ironman Innerscan Bioimpedance Scale used to determine TBW%, MM%, FAT% and FATARM%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TBW% vs. FAT%

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

FAT% TBW% TBW% = ‐0.643(FAT%) + 70.5 N = 65 R = 0.984

Results

Inverse relationship between TBW% and FAT%, as expected

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results

  • TDC values at forearm and biceps are most

strongly positively correlated to MM% at forearm and bicep and are significantly negatively correlated to FATARM%.

  • TDC values are positively correlated with

TBW% and negatively correlated to FAT%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results

  • Strongest correlations were for forearm 1.5

mm depth TDC values yielding linear regression equations:

  • TDC= 0.465 (TBW%) + 7.94 (r=0.700)
  • TDC= ‐0.319(FAT%) + 41.2 (r=0.736)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Forearm TDC AT 1.5 mm Depth

20 25 30 35 40 45 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

TBW% TDC

TDC = 0.471(TBW%) + 10.3 N = 65 R = 0.661

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Forearm TDC AT 1.5 mm Depth

20 25 30 35 40 45 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

FAT% TDC

TDC = ‐0.286(FAT%) + 40.1 N = 65 R = 0.693

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

When absolute TDC values are needed, our findings provide a basis to individualize TDC reference values using a patient’s body habitus, including their TBW% and FAT%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Questions?