arevir 11 04 2008
play

AREVIR 11.04.2008 CCR5 Antagonists Antagonists CCR5 In Clinical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AREVIR 11.04.2008 CCR5 Antagonists Antagonists CCR5 In Clinical Clinical Practice Practice In Dr. Bj rn Jensen rn Jensen Dr. Bj Klinik f r r Gastroenterologie Gastroenterologie, , Hepatologie Hepatologie und und


  1. AREVIR 11.04.2008 CCR5 Antagonists Antagonists CCR5 In Clinical Clinical Practice Practice In Dr. Bjö örn Jensen rn Jensen Dr. Bj Klinik fü ür r Gastroenterologie Gastroenterologie, , Hepatologie Hepatologie und und Infektiologie Infektiologie Klinik f Universitä ätsklinikum D tsklinikum Dü üsseldorf sseldorf Universit

  2. Chemokine Receptor Tropism Study/Source Population N R5, % D/M, % X4, % ACTG 5211 [1] Experienced 391 49 47 4 SCOPE [2] Experienced 186 60 39.5 0.5 MOTIVATE 1 & 2 [3] Experienced 2560 56 41 3 TORO [4] Experienced 627 50 48 2 HOMER cohort [5] Naive 979 82 18 < 1 Chelsea & Naive 402 81 19 < 1 Westminster cohort [6] Demarest [7] Naive 299 88 12 0 Pfizer 1026 [3] Naive 1428 85 15 < 1 1. Wilkin T, et al. CROI 2006. Abstract 655. 2. Hunt, et al. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:926-930. 3. Coakley E, et al. Second Viral Entry Wkshp. Abstract 8. 4. Melby T, et al. EI 2005. 5. Brumme ZL, et al. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:466-474. 6. Moyle GJ, et al. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:866-872. 7. Demarest J, et al. ICAAC 2004. Abstract H-1136.

  3. Association Between Tropism and baseline CD4+ Cell Count Cross-sectional Canadian study of 979 patients beginning triple therapy BL CD4+ R5 virus, % D/M or X4 virus, % cell count, cells/mm 3 > 500 93 7 350-499 91 9 200-349 91 9 100-199 72 28 50-99 74 26 25-49 69 31 < 25 46 54 Brumme ZL, et al. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:466-474.

  4. Consequences for the clinician � Demand for a tropism test which should be readily available and should produce reliable results as soon as possible in almost all patients � Problems: � patients with low viremia (esp. phenotypic tests) � time lag between sampling and receiving the result/starting therapy � minorities (clinical relevance?) � Non-B-Subtypes?

  5. MERIT Study: Trial Design Efavirenz (EFV 600 mg QD) + Combivir (ZDV+3TC)* Randomization 1:1 Maraviroc (MVC 300 mg BID) + Combivir (ZDV+3TC)* Screening 0 96 wk 48 wk (6 weeks) First Primary patient visit analysis Nov 2004 Patient eligibility criteria: • ≥ 16 years of age • HIV-1 RNA ≥ 2,000 copies/mL • Treatment naive • No evidence of resistance to EFV, ZDV, or 3TC • R5 HIV-1 infection Patients stratified by: • HIV-1 RNA < and ≥ 100,000 copies/mL at screening • Geographic location: Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere *Patients experiencing toxicity to ZDV or 3TC were permitted to substitute an alternative NRTI Saag M, et al. IAS 2007. Abstract WESS104.

  6. Percentage of Patients with Undetectable HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 (Primary Endpoint) <400 copies/mL <50 copies/mL 100 –3.0* (–9.5 † ) –4.2* (–10.9 † ) 90 EFV + CBV 80 73.1 70.6 69.3 MVC + CBV 70 65.3 Patients (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 N= 360 361 360 361 Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, ITT *Difference (adjusted for randomization strata) † Lower bound of 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval; noninferiority margin = –10% Saag M, et al. IAS 2007. Abstract WESS104.

  7. MERIT: Maraviroc vs Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive Pts � MVC failed to meet primary endpoint of noninferiority in HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 (lower 97.5% CI: -10.9%) � MVC noninferior in HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL � MVC associated with higher CD4+ cell count increases � Superior safety profile for MVC vs EFV

  8. MERIT Substudy: Viral Suppression at Week 48 by Baseline Tropism Change in detected HIV-1 tropism � from R5 at screening to D/M at BL and potentially adherence may Patients With VL < 50 c/mL at Week 48 (%) 100 explain some treatment failures on EFV 90 MVC MVC 80 � 3.5% of patients experienced 69.3 69.3 68.0 70 65.3 change in detected tropism 60 between screening and BL 54.6 50 � 50.0% of patients with R5 virus 40 at BL and without confirmed X4 30 at failure had plasma MVC concentrations below limit of 20 7.1 detection 10 n = 361 360 339 331 11 14 Tropism changes more common in 0 � Overall Tropism at Tropism at patients with lower mean CD4+ cell Baseline Baseline count at screening as well as with (R5) (D/M) clade B or other/undetermined HIV-1 subtype vs clade C Heera J, et al. CROI 2008. Abstract 40LB.

  9. VICTOR-E1: Phase IIb Trial of Vicriviroc in Treatment-Experienced Patients with R5-Virus Screening* Week 48 (Weeks 4-6) VCV 20 mg once daily + NRTI-, NNRTI-, OBR including RTV-boosted PI PI-experienced HIV-infected adults with ≥ 1 RT mutation, ≥ 1 primary PI mutation, VCV 30 mg once daily + CCR5 tropism, HIV-1 RNA OBR including RTV-boosted PI > 1000 copies/mL, and on stable antiretroviral therapy (N = 116) Placebo + OBR including RTV-boosted PI *Confirmation of tropism required before randomization. Zingman B, et al. CROI 2008. Abstract 39LB.

  10. VICTOR-E1: Virological Efficacy at Week 48 VCV 30 mg VCV 20 mg Placebo 100 n = 39 n = 40 n = 35 0 90 Mean Change in HIV-1 RNA from BL -0.2 80 Patients With HIV-RNA-1 -0.4 < 50 copies/mL (%) 70 (log 10 copies/mL) -0.6 56 60 53 -0.8 50 -0.79 -1.0 40 -1.2 30 -1.4 20 14 -1.6 10 -1.8 -1.75 -1.77 0 Difference: Difference: -2.0 -0.98 -0.96 VCV 30 mg VCV 20 mg Placebo n = 26 n = 24 n = 9 P = .0017 P = .0028 � No clinically significant differences in adverse events between VCV arms and placebo Zingman B, et al. CROI 2008. Abstract 39LB.

  11. MOTIVATE: Maraviroc in Treatment-Experienced Patients with R5 Virus � Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel phase IIb/III studies � Primary endpoint: mean change in HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 2:2:1 randomization; Planned interim analysis stratified by ENF use Week 24 Week 48 and VL < or ≥ 100,000 c/mL Maraviroc 150 mg or 300 mg twice daily + OBR* (n = 426) Triple-class–resistant or triple-class– experienced patients with R5 virus and HIV-1 RNA ≥ 5000 copies/mL Maraviroc 150 mg or 300 mg once daily + OBR* (n = 414) ( MOTIVATE 1 : N = 601; Canada, US) ( MOTIVATE 2 : N = 475; Europe, Placebo + OBR Australia, US) (n = 209) *Patients receiving PI (except TPV) or delavirdine received 150 mg; all others received 300 mg. Nelson M, et al. CROI 2007. Abstract 104aLB. Lalezari J, et al. CROI 2007. Abstract 104bLB.

  12. MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Combined Virologic and Immunologic Efficacy � MVC + OBR associated with significantly greater viral suppression than placebo + OBR in treatment-experienced patients Patient Outcome at Week 48 Placebo + MVC QD + MVC BID + OBR OBR OBR (n = 209) (n = 414) (n = 426) Median HIV-1 RNA change from -1.84 † -0.78 -1.68* BL, log 10 copies/mL* Mean CD4+ cell count change 61 116 124 from baseline, cells/mm 3 *Difference vs placebo: -0.89 (95% CI: -1.17 to -0.62). † Difference vs placebo: -1.05 (95% CI: -1.33 to -0.78). Hardy D, et al. CROI 2008. Abstract 792.

  13. MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Combined Virologic Efficacy at Week 48 100 90 Placebo + OBR (n = 209) Patients with VL < 50 c/mL (%) MVC QD + OBR (n = 414) 80 MVC BID + OBR (n = 426) 70 60 50 45.5%* 43.2%* 40 30 20 16.7% 10 * P < .0001 vs placebo 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 Time (Weeks) Hardy D, et al. CROI 2008. Abstract 792.

  14. MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Combined Virologic Efficacy at Week 48 100 <100.000 copies/mL >100.000 copies/mL 90 Patients <50 c/mL (%) 80 70 59 58 60 50 35 40 32 26 30 20 10 10 0 Placebo MVC QD + OBR MVC BID + OBR Hardy D, et al. CROI 2008. Abstract 792.

  15. MOTIVATE 1 and 2: HIV-1 RNA < 50 c/mL at Wk 24 by Active Drugs in OBR Combined Analysis: MOTIVATE 1 and 2 100 90 Placebo + OBR MVC QD + OBR MVC BID + OBR 80 70 61 Patients (%) 58 55 60 53 52 50 43 43 40 29 30 19 18 20 9 10 3 0 n = 51 56 44 130 134 59 64 132 121 35 88 104 Number of Active Drugs in OBR 0 1 2 ≥ 3 Nelson M, et al. CROI 2007. Abstract 104aLB. Lalezari J, et al. CROI 2007. Abstract 104bLB.

  16. Immunological Efficacy of CCR5-Coreceptor- Antagonists � Meta-analysis of 37 arms from 16 clinical trials in treatment- experienced patients (9 arms from 4 trials used CCR5 inhibitors): CCR5 inhibitor-use associated with greater increase in CD4+ cell count after controlling for baseline viral load and virologic response (+32 cells/mm 3 ; 95% CI: 19-54) � Redistribution of CD4 cells to the periphery by blocking CCR5 receptors which serve as a homing receptor to lymphatic tissues ? Wilkin T, et al. CROI 2008. Abstract 800.

  17. CCR5 Antagonists: Safety issues � Development of Aplaviroc discontinued due to severe liver toxicity � ACTG 5211 (Phase-II Vicriviroc) with a higher incidence of cancer in patients treated with the active drug, though relationship with drug doubtful 1 � Postural hypotension was the dose-limiting AE for Maraviroc in Phase I-Study – only seen at rates higher than placebo for doses of ≥ 600 mg 2 1. Gulick R, et al. IAS 2007. Abstract TUAB102. 2. McHale M, et al. IAS 2005. Oral TuOa0204.

  18. MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Side effects Hardy D, et al. CROI 2008. Poster 792.

  19. MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Maraviroc Safe and Well Tolerated at Week 48 � Similar frequency of serious all-grade AEs, toxicity-driven discontinuations, laboratory abnormalities, AIDS-defining infections, and AIDS- or non-AIDS–defining malignancies among MVC vs placebo arms at Week 48 � Most common AEs across study arms: diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, headache � No deaths reported during the study or up to 28 days of stopping study drug were considered to be related to study medication. Hardy D, et al. CROI 2008. Poster 792.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend