Appr Appropri opriations ations Subcommitt Sub committee ee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

appr appropri opriations ations
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Appr Appropri opriations ations Subcommitt Sub committee ee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hea Hearing ring of the of the Appr Appropri opriations ations Subcommitt Sub committee ee on on Cor Correct rections ions 4 TH OF DECEMBER 2019, LANSING, MI Des Descriptiv criptive S e Stud tudy y of MD of MDOC OC Staf


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Hea Hearing ring of the

  • f the

Appr Appropri

  • priations

ations Sub Subcommitt committee ee

  • n
  • n Cor

Correct rections ions

4TH OF DECEMBER 2019, LANSING, MI

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Des Descriptiv criptive S e Stud tudy y of MD

  • f MDOC

OC Staf taff Well ell-bei being: ng: Contributing F Contributing Fact actor

  • rs,

s, Outcomes Outcomes, , and A and Actio ctionable Solut nable Solutions ions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Study conducted by

Desert Waters Correctional Outreach

and Gallium Social Sciences

Caterina Spinaris, Ph.D. Nicole Brocato, Ph.D.

HT HTTP TP://DES ://DESERT ERTWATERS.COM TERS.COM

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What Do the Data Show?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Clinical Disorder Rates by MDOC Work Group

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Percentage of All MDOC Staff Screening Positive for Clinical Disorders

16 47 22 19 9

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Depression Anxiety PTSD Alcohol Abuse Suicidal Ideation

Rate (%)

Using weighted survey data

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Clinical Disorder Rates by Work Group

  • 1. Women’s Custody staff
  • 2. Women’s non-custody

staff

  • 3. Men’s custody staff
  • 4. Men’s non-custody

staff

  • 5. Field Operations

Administration, Parole and Probation Agents

  • 6. FOA all other staff
  • 7. Headquarters

Managers/Supervisors

  • 8. Headquarters Support

staff

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Custody staff % (n) Non-custody staff % (n) Depression & PTSD 20% (1303) 5% (302) …& Generalized Anxiety 18% (1203) 5% (279) …& Alcohol Abuse 8% (515) 1% (71) …& Active suicide plans < 1% (61) < 1% (6)

Co-occurring Disorder Estimates for All MDOC Staff

Using weighted survey data

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Path Model

Supported by the Data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Health Outcome Variables Used in Path Model

▪ So Social cial He Healt alth: h: quality of staff relationships with direct supervisors, coworkers and offenders ▪ Work

  • rk He

Healt alth: h: morale, physical and emotional energy levels, and job satisfaction ▪ Me Mental ntal He Healt alth: h: screening for depression, PTSD, anxiety, alcohol abuse, suicidal thoughts and behaviors ▪ Ph Phys ysical ical He Healt alth: h: sum of 22 diagnoses ▪ Fami amily ly He Healt alth: h: withdrawal, unavailability, and behaviors based on work trauma

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Final Path Model of the Variables Studied and their Relationships

Interpr rpret eting standa ndardized rdized path th componen ents ts in c complex ex models Small < .2 Modest st .2-.3 .3 Stro trong .3-.4 .4 Unusually large > . .4

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Most Important Outcome Variables

1.

  • 1. Wor
  • rk

k He Health alth

2.

  • 2. Soc

Social Health ial Health

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What Do Staff’s Comments Tell Us?

▪ Rel elat ations ionships hips wi with co cowor

  • rker

ers and and s sup uper ervi visor

  • rs char

aract acterize erized d by m y mis istrus trust, t, ang anger er and and f fea ear ▪ Perceiv erceived ed pu punit nitiv ive e and r and retal aliat iator

  • ry

y le leade adersh ship ip st styles yles ▪ Perceived “heavy handed” investigative and disciplinary practices of staff that produce produce anx anxiety iety and and f fea ear ▪ Progr Progres essiv ively ely inc incre reas asing ing lo loss of em

  • f emplo

ployment yment be bene nefit its s = lo = loss of inc

  • f incen

entiv ives es and and lo loss of de

  • f desire

ire to w

  • work
  • rk at

at MD MDOC OC ▪ Perc erception eption of

  • f no

not bei being v ng val alue ued d by th y the S e Stat ate e of

  • f Mic

Michig igan or an or MDOC ▪ Ma Manda ndator

  • ry

y over erti time me = e = exh xhaus austion, tion, sle leep ep de depr priv ivat ation and f ion and fam amil ily y li life e di disru ruption ption ▪ Pr Pris ison

  • n clo

losures ures = fa famil ily y li life di disruptio ruption

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What Do the Data Mean?

Actionable Conclusions and Recommendations

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mental Health Difficulties

▪ There are serious levels of mental health difficulties among most MDOC Work Groups in comparison to national data for the general population, the military and first responders

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Custody Staff Most Severely Affected and in Need

  • f Most Help

▪ Of all Work Groups, custody staff at male facilities exhibited: ▪ highest rates of mental health disorders ▪ lower Social Health ▪ lower Work Health

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Quote

“There com comes es a poi a point whe nt when n we we need to st need to stop

  • p ju

just st pu pulli lling ng pe peop

  • ple

le ou

  • ut

t of

  • f th

the river. river. We need to go upstream and find out why they’re fa falling lling in in.” ~ Desmond Tutu

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Work Health in Dire Need of Improvement

  • Work
  • rk He

Healt alth h (demoralization, physical and emotional exhaustion, and job dissatisfaction) was the mo most st inf influe luent ntial ial Ou Outc tcome

  • me var

ariab iable le, , st stron

  • ngly

gly or

  • r un

unusuall usually y st stron

  • ngly

gly impacting: ▪Me Ment ntal al He Healt alth, , Fam amily ily He Healt alth, , Ph Phys ysica ical l He Healt alth

▪Th The bes e best w t way t y to impac

  • impact

t Me Mental ntal He Health alth is is thr through

  • ugh the

the impro improvement ement of

  • f Work
  • rk He

Health alth

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Social Health in Dire Need of Improvement

▪ Work

  • rk He

Healt alth h in t in tur urn n was as st stron

  • ngly

gly im impac pacted d by y So Socia cial He Healt alth

▪Th The bes e best w t way t y to impac

  • impact

t Work

  • rk He

Health alth is is thr through

  • ugh the

the impro improvement of ement of So Social cial He Health alth

▪ So Socia cial He l Healt alth: h: Qu Qualit ality y of staff’s professional re relat lation ionship ships s with direct supervisors, coworkers and offenders

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Psychological Trauma Does Not Happen in a Vacuum

▪ Lack of social support post-trauma increases risk

  • f PTSD for combat veterans (Gates, Holowka, et al., 2012)

▪ High levels of work strain (organizational and administrative stressors) increase PTSD risk in firefighters (Corneil, Beaton, et al., 1999)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Psychological Trauma Does Not Happen in a Vacuum

▪ High levels of work social support and family social support lower risk of PTSD in firefighters

(Corneil, Beaton, et al., 1999)

▪ Positive leadership in military units (positive command climate) increases soldiers’ resilience /resistance to the effects of trauma (Meredith et al. 2011,

RAND report)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Title and Content Layout with List

▪ Add your first bullet point here ▪ Add your second bullet point here ▪ Add your third bullet point here

slide-23
SLIDE 23

System-wide Programming

▪ Progr Program ammi ming ng de desig signed ned to im

  • impro

prove both both Work

  • rk

He Healt alth h an and So d Socia cial He l Healt alth is an is an e essent ssential ial an and v d vit ital al st star artin ting g poi point nt as as MDO MDOC C to c

  • con
  • ntin

tinues ues to p

  • pur

ursue sue ways ys t to

  • inc

incre rease ase emp mplo loyee ee well ll-be being ing (MD MDOC OC Stra Strategic Plan gic Plan 2 2019 19-2022 2022). ).

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Research-supported Programming Strategies

  • Spe

pecializ cialized ed st staf aff tr f train aining ings and s and progr program ams s to

  • inc

include lude: ▪ Le Leade adership ship sk skills ills ▪ Ma Mana nage geme ment sk nt skills ills ▪ Int Interp erper ersonal ski sonal skills lls ▪ Se Self lf-care/ care/welln ellness ess sk skills ills

  • Im

Imple plemen mentat tation ion of

  • f po

polic licie ies, em s, emplo ployme yment nt be benefits nefits, , inc incenti ntives es an and re d resour sources ces th that at imp impact act the the workf

  • rkforce
  • rce

cu cult lture ure an and in d incr crease ease st staf aff w f work e

  • rk eng

ngage agement ment

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Research-supported Programming Strategies

  • Im

Imple plemen mentat tation ion of

  • f

par parti ticip cipat ator

  • ry

y meth methods

  • ds

th that at con conti tinu nually ally inc incorpor

  • rporat

ate emp mplo loyee ee feedba edback

  • Main

ainten enance ance of

  • f lon

long-ter erm, syst m, system em-wide wide st staf aff f welln llness ss effor

  • rts

ts

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Than Thank y k you.

  • u.

Que Questions? stions?