Atm ospheric Deposition, Atm ospheric Deposition, Transport, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

atm ospheric deposition atm ospheric deposition transport
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Atm ospheric Deposition, Atm ospheric Deposition, Transport, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Atm ospheric Deposition, Atm ospheric Deposition, Transport, Transform ations , Transport, Transform ations , Fate and Bioavailability of Fate and Bioavailability of Mercury in Forested Mercury in Forested W atersheds of the W atersheds


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Atm ospheric Deposition, Atm ospheric Deposition, Transport, Transform ations Transport, Transform ations Fate and Bioavailability of Fate and Bioavailability of Mercury in Forested Mercury in Forested W atersheds of the W atersheds of the Northeastern U.S. Northeastern U.S. , ,

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline Outline

  • Upland transformations

Upland transformations

  • Wetland

Wetland-

  • surface water dynamics

surface water dynamics

  • Patterns in aquatic biota

Patterns in aquatic biota

  • MCM

MCM-

  • HD

HD – – Model calculations Model calculations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Collaborators Collaborators

  • Ron Munson

Ron Munson -

  • Tetra Tech

Tetra Tech

  • Jason Demers

Jason Demers -

  • Cornell

Cornell

  • Neil

Neil Kamman Kamman -

  • VT DEC

VT DEC

  • David Evers

David Evers -

  • Biodiversity Research Institute

Biodiversity Research Institute

  • Tom

Tom Holsen Holsen, Hyun , Hyun-

  • Deok

Deok Choi Choi – – Clarkson Clarkson

  • Eric Miller

Eric Miller – – Ecosystem Research Group Ecosystem Research Group

  • Brian

Brian Branfireum Branfireum -

  • Toronto

Toronto

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Site Description Site Description

Sunday Lake Watershed Arbutus Lake Watershed

Adirondack Park

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Study Region and Mercury Datasets

Evers 2005. Mercury Connections.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Throughfall Litterfall Deposition Canopy air Canopy air Soil Leaf tissue Leaf tissue Evasion Soil Soil Soil Water Soil Water Root tissue Root tissue

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Year

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Total Hg (ng/L)

2 4 6 8 10

Huntington Forest Biscuit Brook

Wet Hg Deposition - 6.9 ug/m2-yr

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Forest Ecosystem Hg Mass Balance Forest Ecosystem Hg Mass Balance

slide-10
SLIDE 10

24.3

Forest Ecosystem Hg Mass Balance Forest Ecosystem Hg Mass Balance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mercury Flux from Soil Surface Mercury Flux from Soil Surface

Time of Day

13:00: 17:00: 21:00: 01:00: 05:00: 09:00: 13:00: 17:00: 21:00: 01:00: 05:00: 09:00: 13:00:

THg Flux [ng m-2 hr-1]

5 10 15 20 25

Relative Humidity [%]

40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Temperature [oC]

16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Hg Flux RH [%] Temperature [oC]

slide-12
SLIDE 12

From Miller et al. 2 0 0 5 .

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mercury in Fish by Species Mercury in Fish by Species

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lake-w atersheds vary in their sensitivity to m ercury inputs based on: 1 . Land Cover ( e.g., forest, w etlands) 2 . Hydrologic flow paths 3 . Aquatic productivity

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Mercury Cycling Model for Headw ater Mercury Cycling Model for Headw ater Drainage Lakes ( MCM Drainage Lakes ( MCM -

  • HD)

HD)

Precipit at ion Rain ET Part icle Capt ure Throughfall

CANOPY INTERACTIONS WETLAND WATER QUALITY/HYDROLOGY SOIL HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITION WETLAND Hg PROCESSES

Organic Complexat ion Sorpt ion Clay

R-SH Hg R-SH Hg Hg Hg … …

SOIL CHEMICAL PROCESSES

Volat ilizat ion

Hg (II) Hg (O) CH3 -Hg

R e d u c t i

  • n

M e t h y l a t i

  • n

D e m e t h y l a t i

  • n
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Sunday Lake I nlet Calibration: Sunday Lake I nlet Calibration: Total Hg Total Hg

2 4 6 8 10 Sep/1/99 Aug/31/00 Aug/31/01 Sep/1/02 Simulated Observed

Total Hg (ng/l)

Date

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sunday Lake I nlet Calibration: Sunday Lake I nlet Calibration: Methyl Hg Methyl Hg

1 2 3 Sep/1/99 Aug/31/00 Aug/31/01 Sep/1/02 Simulated Observed

Methyl Hg (ng/l)

Date

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Sunday Lake: Sim ulated Response of Fish Sunday Lake: Sim ulated Response of Fish Hg to 1 5 % and 5 0 % Decreases in Hg to 1 5 % and 5 0 % Decreases in Atm ospheric Hg Deposition Atm ospheric Hg Deposition

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 100 200 300 400 500 Mercury Deposition at Current Level Mercury Deposition Reduced 50% Mercury Deposition Reduced 15% Yellow Perch Hg (ug/g) Simulation Year

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Conclusions Conclusions

  • The forest canopy enhances Hg deposition

The forest canopy enhances Hg deposition

  • Hg inputs are retained in soil, re

Hg inputs are retained in soil, re-

  • emitted

emitted to the atmosphere or lost with drainage to the atmosphere or lost with drainage

  • Wetlands enhance the supply and

Wetlands enhance the supply and transport of transport of MeHg MeHg

  • Marked bioaccumulation of

Marked bioaccumulation of MeHg MeHg occurs in

  • ccurs in

the aquatic food chain the aquatic food chain

  • The western Adirondacks is a Hg “hotspot”

The western Adirondacks is a Hg “hotspot”

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Research Needs Research Needs

  • Dry deposition (total deposition)

Dry deposition (total deposition)

  • Fate of soil Hg

Fate of soil Hg

  • Soil re

Soil re-

  • emissions

emissions

  • Response of fish Hg to changes in Hg

Response of fish Hg to changes in Hg inputs and acid rain inputs and acid rain