apna 29th annual conference session 3016 1 october 30 2015
play

APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015 Amy - PDF document

APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015 Amy LaValla DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, PHN The speaker has no conflicts of interest to disclose Identify why comprehensive fall risk assessment policies are needed Recognize


  1. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015 Amy LaValla DNP, APRN, PMHNP-BC, PHN  The speaker has no conflicts of interest to disclose  Identify why comprehensive fall risk assessment policies are needed  Recognize improvements made within the described facility and areas for continued growth  Recognize how to use lessons learned in this project to organize and improve future implementations and changes LaValla 1

  2. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015  Area of concern identified by The Joint Commission and Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (Degelau et al., 2012)  Falls can lead to: ◦ Injury (Healey et al., 2014; Lee, Geller & Strasser, 2013) ◦ Increased costs (Lee, Geller, & Strasser, 2013; Wu, Keeler, Rubenstein, Maglione, & Shekelle, 2010 ) ◦ Increased disability (Ivziku, Matarese, & Pedone, 2010; Oliver, Britton, Seed, Martin, & Hopper, 1997)  Individuals in psychiatric hospitals have an increased risk of falling (Blair & Grunman, 2005; Edmonson, Robinson, & Huges, 2011 )  Additional fall risk assessment tools identified ◦ Suitability based on ages and medical conditions  Updated policy included: ◦ Additional assessment tools ◦ Reassessment parameters  Visual identification available for those found to be at risk for falling  Fall risk reassessment rates ◦ 10% increase to 16.7% of patients reassessed Pat Patient ents R Reev evaluate aluated f d for r Fall R Risk B sk Befor ore an e and After ter Implementati Imp tion Before After 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% LaValla 2

  3. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015  Visual identification after implementation ◦ 35.7% of patients correctly identified to be at risk ◦ 42.9% of patients incorrectly identified Use o e of Visual I sual Identif entification cation Proper Improper 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%  Finding appropriate tools  Locating information in literature regarding policies or reassessment parameters  Delay in implementation  Accessibility of tools  Improve staff training on new policy and tools  Low accuracy of visual identification placed on/above doors  Need to reinforce new policy via communication and leadership support ◦ Incorporation of change tactics (Packard, 2013) LaValla 3

  4. APNA 29th Annual Conference Session 3016.1: October 30, 2015  Improvements made  Project shortfalls may be utilized to improve future developments  Communication is key!  Blair & Grunman, 2005  Degelau et al., 2012  Edmonson, Robinson, & Huges, 2011  Healey et al., 2014  Ivziku, Matarese, & Pedone, 2010  Lee, Geller, & Strasser, 2013  Oliver, Britton, Seed, Martin, & Hopper, 1997  Packard, 2013  The Joint Commission, 2008  Wu, Keeler, Rubenstein, Maglione, & Shekelle, 2010 LaValla 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend