ap ery numbers and their experimental siblings
play

Ap ery numbers and their experimental siblings Challenges in 21st - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ap ery numbers and their experimental siblings Challenges in 21st Century Experimental Mathematical Computation ICERM, Brown University Armin Straub July 22, 2014 University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign n 2 n + k 2 n


  1. Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Challenges in 21st Century Experimental Mathematical Computation ICERM, Brown University Armin Straub July 22, 2014 University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k k =0 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , 33001 , 819005 , 21460825 , . . . Jon Borwein Dirk Nuyens James Wan Wadim Zudilin Robert Osburn Brundaban Sahu Mathew Rogers Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 1 / 20

  2. Ap´ ery numbers and the irrationality of ζ (3) • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)(17 n 2 + 17 n + 5) u n − n 3 u n − 1 . Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 2 / 20

  3. Ap´ ery numbers and the irrationality of ζ (3) • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1445 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)(17 n 2 + 17 n + 5) u n − n 3 u n − 1 . ζ (3) = � ∞ 1 THM n 3 is irrational. n =1 Ap´ ery ’78 The same recurrence is satisfied by the “near”-integers proof   n n k � 2 � n + k � 2 ( − 1) m − 1 � n 1 � � �  . B ( n ) = j 3 +  2 m 3 � n �� n + m � k k m m j =1 m =1 k =0 Then, B ( n ) A ( n ) → ζ (3) . But too fast for ζ (3) to be rational. Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 2 / 20

  4. Zagier’s search and Ap´ ery-like numbers • Recurrence for Ap´ ery numbers is the case ( a, b, c ) = (17 , 5 , 1) of ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 3 u n − 1 . Are there other tuples ( a, b, c ) for which the solution defined by Q Beukers, u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 is integral? Zagier Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 3 / 20

  5. Zagier’s search and Ap´ ery-like numbers • Recurrence for Ap´ ery numbers is the case ( a, b, c ) = (17 , 5 , 1) of ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 3 u n − 1 . Are there other tuples ( a, b, c ) for which the solution defined by Q Beukers, u − 1 = 0 , u 0 = 1 is integral? Zagier • Essentially, only 14 tuples ( a, b, c ) found. (Almkvist–Zudilin) • 4 hypergeometric and 4 Legendrian solutions • 6 sporadic solutions • Similar (and intertwined) story for: • ( n + 1) 2 u n +1 = ( an 2 + an + b ) u n − cn 2 u n − 1 (Beukers, Zagier) • ( n + 1) 3 u n +1 = (2 n + 1)( an 2 + an + b ) u n − n ( cn 2 + d ) u n − 1 (Cooper) Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 3 / 20

  6. Ap´ ery-like numbers • Hypergeometric and Legendrian solutions have generating functions � 1 � 2 � � 2 , α, 1 − α � 1 � α, 1 − α − C α z � � 3 F 2 � 4 C α z , 1 − C α z 2 F 1 , � � 1 , 1 1 1 − C α z � with α = 1 2 , 1 3 , 1 4 , 1 6 and C α = 2 4 , 3 3 , 2 6 , 2 4 · 3 3 . • The six sporadic solutions are: ( a, b, c ) A ( n ) � (3 k )! k ( − 1) k 3 n − 3 k � n �� n + k (7 , 3 , 81) � 3 k n k ! 3 � 3 �� 4 n − 5 k − 1 �� k ( − 1) k � n � 4 n − 5 k � � (11 , 5 , 125) + k 3 n 3 n � 2 � 2 k � n �� 2( n − k ) � (10 , 4 , 64) � k k k n − k � 2 � 2 � 2 k � n � (12 , 4 , 16) k k n � 2 � n �� k + l � n �� k � � (9 , 3 , − 27) k,l k l l n � 2 � 2 � n + k � n (17 , 5 , 1) � k k n Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 4 / 20

  7. Modularity of Ap´ ery-like numbers • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1145 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 � η ( τ ) η (6 τ ) � 12 n η 7 (2 τ ) η 7 (3 τ ) � = A ( n ) . η 5 ( τ ) η 5 (6 τ ) η (2 τ ) η (3 τ ) n � 0 modular form modular function Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 5 / 20

  8. Modularity of Ap´ ery-like numbers • The Ap´ ery numbers 1 , 5 , 73 , 1145 , . . . n � 2 � n + k � 2 � n � A ( n ) = k k satisfy k =0 � η ( τ ) η (6 τ ) � 12 n η 7 (2 τ ) η 7 (3 τ ) � = A ( n ) . η 5 ( τ ) η 5 (6 τ ) η (2 τ ) η (3 τ ) n � 0 modular form modular function Not at all evidently, such a modular parametrization exists for FACT all known Ap´ ery-like numbers! • Context: f ( τ ) modular form of weight k x ( τ ) modular function y ( x ) such that y ( x ( τ )) = f ( τ ) Then y ( x ) satisfies a linear differential equation of order k + 1 . Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 5 / 20

  9. Supercongruences for Ap´ ery numbers • Chowla, Cowles and Cowles (1980) conjectured that, for p � 5 , mod p 3 . A ( p ) ≡ 5 Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 6 / 20

  10. Supercongruences for Ap´ ery numbers • Chowla, Cowles and Cowles (1980) conjectured that, for p � 5 , mod p 3 . A ( p ) ≡ 5 mod p 3 . • Gessel (1982) proved that A ( mp ) ≡ A ( m ) Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 6 / 20

  11. Supercongruences for Ap´ ery numbers • Chowla, Cowles and Cowles (1980) conjectured that, for p � 5 , mod p 3 . A ( p ) ≡ 5 mod p 3 . • Gessel (1982) proved that A ( mp ) ≡ A ( m ) The Ap´ ery numbers satisfy the supercongruence ( p � 5 ) THM Beukers, Coster A ( mp r ) ≡ A ( mp r − 1 ) mod p 3 r . ’85, ’88 Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 6 / 20

  12. Supercongruences for Ap´ ery numbers • Chowla, Cowles and Cowles (1980) conjectured that, for p � 5 , mod p 3 . A ( p ) ≡ 5 mod p 3 . • Gessel (1982) proved that A ( mp ) ≡ A ( m ) The Ap´ ery numbers satisfy the supercongruence ( p � 5 ) THM Beukers, Coster A ( mp r ) ≡ A ( mp r − 1 ) mod p 3 r . ’85, ’88 n � 2 � n + k � 2 EG � n � Mathematica 7 miscomputes A ( n ) = for n > 5500 . k k k =0 A (5 · 11 3 ) = 12488301 . . . about 2000 digits . . . about 8000 digits . . . 795652125 Weirdly, with this wrong value, one still has A (5 · 11 3 ) ≡ A (5 · 11 2 ) mod 11 6 . Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 6 / 20

  13. Supercongruences for Ap´ ery numbers • Chowla, Cowles and Cowles (1980) conjectured that, for p � 5 , mod p 3 . A ( p ) ≡ 5 mod p 3 . • Gessel (1982) proved that A ( mp ) ≡ A ( m ) The Ap´ ery numbers satisfy the supercongruence ( p � 5 ) THM Beukers, Coster A ( mp r ) ≡ A ( mp r − 1 ) mod p 3 r . ’85, ’88 Simple combinatorics proves the congruence EG � 2 p � � p �� � p � mod p 2 . = ≡ 1 + 1 p k p − k k For p � 5 , Wolstenholme’s congruence shows that, in fact, � 2 p � mod p 3 . ≡ 2 p Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 6 / 20

  14. Supercongruences for Ap´ ery-like numbers • Conjecturally, supercongruences like A ( mp r ) ≡ A ( mp r − 1 ) mod p 3 r Robert Osburn Brundaban Sahu (University of Dublin) (NISER, India) hold for all Ap´ ery-like numbers. Osburn–Sahu ’09 • Current state of affairs for the six sporadic sequences from earlier: ( a, b, c ) A ( n ) k ( − 1) k 3 n − 3 k � n � (3 k )! �� n + k (7 , 3 , 81) � modulo p 2 open!! 3 k n k ! 3 Amdeberhan ’14 � 3 �� 4 n − 5 k − 1 �� � 4 n − 5 k k ( − 1) k � n � (11 , 5 , 125) � + Osburn–Sahu–S ’14 k 3 n 3 n � 2 � 2 k �� 2( n − k ) � n � (10 , 4 , 64) � Osburn–Sahu ’11 k k k n − k � 2 � 2 k � 2 � n (12 , 4 , 16) � Osburn–Sahu–S ’14 k k n � 2 � n � n �� k �� k + l � � (9 , 3 , − 27) open k,l k l l n � 2 � 2 � n + k � n � (17 , 5 , 1) Beukers, Coster ’87-’88 k k n Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 7 / 20

  15. A generalization: multivariate supercongruences THM Define A ( n ) = A ( n 1 , n 2 , n 3 , n 4 ) by S 2013 1 � = A ( n ) x n . (1 − x 1 − x 2 )(1 − x 3 − x 4 ) − x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 n ∈ Z 4 � 0 • The Ap´ ery numbers are the diagonal coefficients . • For p � 5 , we have the multivariate supercongruences A ( n p r ) ≡ A ( n p r − 1 ) mod p 3 r . Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 8 / 20

  16. A generalization: multivariate supercongruences THM Define A ( n ) = A ( n 1 , n 2 , n 3 , n 4 ) by S 2013 1 � = A ( n ) x n . (1 − x 1 − x 2 )(1 − x 3 − x 4 ) − x 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 n ∈ Z 4 � 0 • The Ap´ ery numbers are the diagonal coefficients . • For p � 5 , we have the multivariate supercongruences A ( n p r ) ≡ A ( n p r − 1 ) mod p 3 r . • Both A ( n p r ) and A ( n p r − 1 ) have rational generating function. The proof, however, relies on an explicit binomial sum for the coefficients. Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 8 / 20

  17. Short random walks joint work with: Jon Borwein Dirk Nuyens James Wan Wadim Zudilin U. Newcastle, AU K.U.Leuven, BE SUTD, SG U. Newcastle, AU Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 9 / 20

  18. Random walks in the plane n steps in the plane (length 1 , random direction) Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 10 / 20

  19. Random walks in the plane n steps in the plane (length 1 , random direction) Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 10 / 20

  20. Random walks in the plane n steps in the plane (length 1 , random direction) Ap´ ery numbers and their experimental siblings Armin Straub 10 / 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend