antigen igen distri stribu bution ion in placen acenta ta and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

antigen igen distri stribu bution ion in placen acenta ta
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

antigen igen distri stribu bution ion in placen acenta ta and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Yellow ow feve ver immun uniza ization ion dur uring ing preg egnan nancy cy A mo mous use model del: : gestat station onal al perf rform ormance ance and d viral ral antigen igen distri stribu bution ion in placen


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ILLUSTRATION BY CINYEE CHIU

Yellow

  • w feve

ver immun uniza ization ion dur uring ing preg egnan nancy cy A mo mous use model del: : gestat station

  • nal

al perf rform

  • rmance

ance and d viral ral antigen igen distri stribu bution ion in placen acenta ta and d fetuse ses

Estela Bevilacqua

Lab for Research in Maternal-Fetal Interaction & Placenta Dept of Cell and Developmental Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences University of São Paulo, SP – SP Brazil

bevilacq@usp.br

slide-2
SLIDE 2

a) For people living in areas where there is a high potential for YF virus exposure b) For travelers visiting these areas

The benefits of vaccination usually outweigh its potential risks! The yellow fever vaccine should be avoided in pregnant women as far as possible. However, if travel is unavoidable, the

vaccine should be given!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The potential risk of viral transmission (through the placenta) to the fetus associated with the possibility of neuroinvasion

  • f the 17 DD yellow fever

virus led to the general recommendation to do not administer the vaccine during pregnancy except when epidemiologically justified.

Popular strategies that disincentive immunization in general!

Vac acci cination tion during ring pregnanc gnancy

No vaccination during pregnancy in endemic areas  increases the risk for the disease  compromising mother and baby survival

It is imperative to spread knowledge and awareness about the gestational vaccination

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Abortion, stillbirth and malformation rates after vaccination similar to that found in the general population

Suzano et al., 2006 D’Acremont et al., 2008

Disease risk to a developing fetus from maternal vaccination during pregnancy is primary theoretical!

Vac acci cination tion during ring pregn gnanc ancy

Relative risk for spontaneous abortions Congenital YF Malformation after vaccination in pregnant women

Nishioka et al. 1998 Tsai et al., 1933 Bentlin et al., 2011 Cavalcanti et al., 2007 It is imperative to spread knowledge and awareness about the gestational vaccination!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Aim of

  • f th

this stu tudy

To evaluate the effect of vaccination against yellow fever in mice gestational performance correlating these data with the placental structure, immunolocalization of the virus antigen and the viral activity at the maternal- fetal interface, maternal liver, and fetal

  • rganism.

Knowledge to help to demystify vaccination against yellow fever during pregnancy

slide-6
SLIDE 6

All animal care and experimental procedures were followed according to Brazilian College of Animal Experiments (COBEA) and were approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Research (CEEA) of Biomedical Sciences Institute of the University of São Paulo, SP.

Animals Pregnant adult, 3-months old, CD-1 mice on 0.5, 5.5, 11.5 and 13.5 gestation days (gd) (n= 10-13/gestational age) Yellow fever 17DD vaccine (parts 00PVFA028Z; 066VFA061Z and 082VFB006Z) Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Bio-Manguinhos, RJ, Br) Administration - subcutaneous Doses - 2.0 log10 PFU Control group - sterile saline (n=10-11/gestational age) Analysis gd18.5 – euthanasia in CO2 chamber Measurements: number of placentas, early and late resorptions, dead and alive fetuses, implantation sites, fetal and placental weight

Phase se I: To identi ntify fy potenti ential al pregn gnanc ancy phase ses duri ring ng placenta entati tion

  • n and organo

anogene enesis sis in in whic ich vaccina natio tion might ght indu duce ce relevant nt changes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

0.5 gd 1.5 gd

Phase I

Gd 0.5: post-fertilization stage GD 5.5: post-implantation stage

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Placental barrier

Phase I

http://animalia-life.club/other/mouse-embryo- development-timeline.html / 11 Apr 2019

Gd 11.5 and 13.5: Placenta maturation and fetal organogenesis stage

slide-9
SLIDE 9

n Implantation sites (no.)

  • No. of

fetuses

  • No. of

stillborn (%) Alive fetuses (%) Fetal Losses Control gd 0.5 71 10.0 ± 1.52 9.79 ±1.15 O.47 ± 0.58 93.8 6.2 Vaccinated gd 0.5 53 10.60 ± 3.71 9.60 ± 4.9 O.38 ± 0.89 94.9 5.1 Control gd 5.5 183 12.29 ± 2.14 12.06 ± 2.27 0.07 ± 0.26 97.8 2.2 Vaccinated gd 5.5 160 12.25 ± 1.92 9.71 ± 2.62 2.32a ± 1.76 74.0 26.0 Control gd 11.5 79 10.37 ± 2.38 9.88 ± 2.23 0.25 ± 0.46 93.9 7.02 Vaccinated gd11.5 61 11.0 ± 2.45 10.25 ±2.99 0.32 ± 0.46 90.9 9.0 Control gd 13.5 82 11.54 ± 1.05 10.28 ± 1.31 0.78 ± 0.53 91.14 8.86 Vaccinated gd13.5 74 10.03 ± 1.94 9.86 ± 2.05 0.54 ± 0.36 89.91 10.09

Effec ect t of anti-yellow ellow fever vaccina natio tion admi minis nister tered d on gestati tion

  • n

days 0.5, 5.5, 11.5 and 13.5 on the gestationa tional l parame ameter ters

Values correspond to mean  SD; * highlight statistical differences in comparison to the respective age-control.

ap = 0.000 (Student t-test).

Phase I

Significant increase in stillbirth and fetal loss rate when the vaccine is administered on gd5.5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Effec ect t of anti-yellow ellow fever vaccina natio tion admi minis nister tered d on gestatio tion n days 0.5, 5.5, 11.5 or 13.5 on placental ental and fetal l weight ghts

Values correspond to mean  SD; Values indicated by asterisks highlight statistical differences in comparison to the respective age-control. Student t-test (ap= 0.000; bp=0.0000).

gd5.5 - period of susceptibility to vaccinal yellow fever virus during pregnancy?

Phase I n Fetal weight (g) Placental weight (g) Control gd 0.5 28 0.92 ± 0.20 0.12 ± 0.05 Vaccinated gd 0.5 47 0.88 ± 0.16 0.13 ± 0.02 Control gd 5.5 180 0.89 ± 0.19 0.13 ± 0.03 Vaccinated gd 5.5 151 0.75a± 0.21 0.15b ± 0.06 Control gd 11.5 72 0.84 ± 0.15 0.13 ± 0.09 Vaccinated gd 11.5 41 0.87 ± 0.08 0.13 ± 0.03 Control gd 13.5 72 0.84 ± 0.15 0.13 ± 0.09 Vaccinated gd 13.5 41 0.87 ± 0.08 0.12 ± 0.08

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Morphologica phological l analy alysis sis

Dead fetuses were macroscopically subdivided into: A - stillbirth (absence

  • f heartbeat, but no

visible degeneration – late fetal death) B - early fetal death (with apparent development delay & degenerative signals) C - post-implantation resorptions (implantation sites with no recognizable fetal structures)

Dead fetuses: macroscopical analysis on gestation day 18.5. Phase I

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Phase se II: II: Mother hers immuniz unization tion on

  • n gd

gd 5.5. . Identif ntifica cation tion of

  • f viral

al antig igen en distri tribution ution in maternal ernal liver er, , placenta centas s and fetal tal organism anism

Gd 5.5 Gd 18.5 YFV Analyses Post-implantation resorptions (implantation sites with no recognizable fetal structures) Early fetal death (with apparent development delay and degenerative signals) Stillborn puppies (absence of heartbeat, no visible degeneration – late fetal death) Live and apparently healthy fetuses n=25 n=18 Immunolocalization and PCR for yellow fever vaccine virus on the maternal liver and fetal

  • rganism
slide-13
SLIDE 13

A-C: Maternal and fetal liver – rare areas of reactivity D-F: Immunolocalization

  • f YF antigen in

stillborn G-I: Negative controls J: Liver of a patient with YF

Immunolocalization of the yellow fever antigen after vaccination on gd 5.5

Mother Live fetus Stillborn

Liver Stillbirth Controls

Ganglion cells Nerve cells Brain cells

(-) (-) (-) (+)

Phase II

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Vaccine virus reactivity is scarcely detectable in the organs of alive fetuses but, it is frequent in the tissues of stillbirths (mainly nervous cells) Invasion and colonization of vaccinal YF in tissues of stillbirths

Phase II

0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8

Liver Liver Abdominal region Brain Liver Abdominal region (x10) Brain (x10) Mother Live fetuses Stillborns

% YFV immunoreactivity/histological section (n=5)

0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

slide-15
SLIDE 15

A-D: Placentas from live fetuses Few cells show immunoreactivity to the YF viral antigen (arrowheads) in junctional (A,C) and labyrinth zones (D). E-J: Placentas from stillbirth The reaction is intense in junctional zone (E-F: spongiotrophoblast, G: glycogen cells) and in the labyrinth (H-I) B and J: negative controls

Immunolocalization of the YF antigen after vaccination on gd5.5

Placentas of live fetuses and stillbirth

Live Fetuses Stillbirth

Junctional zone Junctional zone Labyrinth zone

(-) (-)

Labyrinth

Vaccine virus reactivity is largely distributed in numerous placental cells in the stillbirth samples

Phase II

slide-16
SLIDE 16

177p ACAGCCATTGCCCCAGCCTCTATCAGAATAAGTGCGCTTGCACGCATTGTCCCCTTCGTT 236 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 1288v ACAGCCATTGCCCCAGCCTCTATCAGAATAAGTGCGCTTGCACGCATTGTCCCCTTCGTT 1229 237p CTCTTCAGCTAGGTGGGCCTCTCCAGTGCTGGGGCACTTGTCATTAATCTTCACATGAGT 296 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 1228v CTCTTCAGCTAGGTGGGCCTCTCCAGTGCTGGGGCACTTGTCATTAATCTTCACATGAGT 1169 297p GAGAACTGCATTGTAACACACTTTCCTCGCCTCAGCAGGTCTATCAATGGCTACTGTCTC 356 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 1168v GAGAACTGCATTGTAACACACTTTCCTCGCCTCAGCAGGTCTATCAATGGCTACTGTCTC 1109 357p TAGTGAGATGTCCAATGAAGGCTTGTCAGGGGCCATAACAGTGACACACTTGTCTTGCTC 416 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 1108v TAGTGAGATGTCCAATGAAGGCTTGTCAGGGGCCATAACAGTGACACACTTGTCTTGCTC 1049 417p CAGGGTA 423 ||||||| 1048v CAGGGTA 1042

Sequencing of the experimental PCR product (from brain of stillborns) and YF vaccine strain 17DD-Brazil showing alignment and 100% identity Database using the BLAST algorithm program

Viral RNA of the capsid protein (465 bp) (A) Very low/no levels detected in maternal liver and fetal tissues of live fetuses (B) Detectable in stillborn tissues

MW: molecular weight ladder mL: maternal liver Pl: placenta (Pl) fB: fetal brain fL: liver Vv: vaccine YF virus (positive control)

Viral RNA is detectable in stillbirth

Phase II

slide-17
SLIDE 17

In summary…

  • 1. Immunization either in post-fertilization phase or during placentation and fetal
  • rganogenesis seems not to interfere in gestation progress associated with fetal

viability.

  • 2. Changes in gestation performance (increase in stillbirth rate) was seen only

when immunization occurred in the post-implantation phase (gd.5.5).

  • 3. In stillborn puppies, YF virus clearly reached the fetal organism -

immunoreactivity to the virus predominated in nervous (neurotropism) and placental tissues; viral RNA was also found in fetal tissues.

  • 4. In born-alive fetuses, only scarce YF-immunopositive cells and traces of viral RNA

were found in the fetal tissues.

  • 5. Litters of the same female could contain living fetuses and stillborn (increased in

number) when immunization occurred on gd5.5.

  • 6. YF virus was found at low levels (traces) in the maternal organism (liver: PCR and

immunoreactions).

To take home…

Immunization during pregnancy showed to be safe. The stage of embryo implantation seems to represent a window of susceptibility in which vaccination and/or associated responses may interfere with the course of gestation. Trophoblast and placenta maturity in late gestational stages may be the key for avoiding congenital passage of the YFV to the fetal organism and/or gestational changes inducing fetal losses.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

May y trophob phoblas last cells ls play y a criti itical cal role le in the still llbi birth th rates es after er vacci cina nation tion on gd5.5? .5?

Post implantation stage gd5.5

Embryonic barriers to the YF virus on gd5.5 Only a thin layer of TGCs lines the embryo surface TGCs are in the process of differentiation entirely geared towards implanting the embryo in the endometrium

speculating...

slide-19
SLIDE 19

speculating...

The immaturity of the giant trophoblast cells may allow YFV colonization at placental (ectoplacental cone - EPC) and embryonic (epiblast) stem cell sites (replication), inducing changes that may compromise fetal survival during later stages of gestation.

TGCs open uterine capillaries surrounding the embryo and establish direct contact with maternal blood  YFV that reach the maternal circulation can interact directly with TGCs. ?????

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Li et al., 2008 YF infection in hamster gd5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 15.5 16.5 17.5 18.5 Cytokines slightly elevated Cytokine increases

YF infection is followed by secretion of imune mediators

Cytokine decreases d0 d3 d6 d8 d12 YF vaccine Increased stillbirth rates

Living fetuses

speculating...

Immune une response ponse to to the YFV?

Viremia peaks

Might the prolonged exposure to immune factors determine a harmful response in the litters with subsequent YF viral invasion of fetal tissues? May happen a similar cytokine secretion/variation after immunization? Fetal organisms from mothers vaccinated on gd5.5 would be longer under the action of these cytokines

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Ongoi

  • ing

g experi riments ents inclu lude:

  • 1. Increase in the frequency of immunizations during the

implantation process.

  • 2. YFV localization/activity and cytokine profile in the

embryos/fetuses and placental tissues at different time points after vaccination (temporal dynamics of the response to vaccination in the fetal organism)

  • 3. Cytokine kinetics/viremia estimation in the maternal organism at

different time points after vaccination (temporal dynamics of the response to vaccination in the maternal organism)

  • 4. In vitro assays using post-implantation TGCs and vaccinal YF to

analyze anti-viral immune defenses in trophoblast cells.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fernanda Carini Fernanda Magaldi Karen Prado Karla Castro Franciele Araujo Aline Lorenzon-Ojea Carla Bandeira Sara Zago Marco Aurelio Amadeo Lab for Research in Maternal-Fetal Interaction & Placenta

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Helena Sato

Immunization Program at the Dept of Health of the State of São Paulo, SP

Claudio Marinho

Institute of Biomedical Sciences, USP

Rossana Francisco Mara S. Hoshida

Medical School-USP, SP-Brazil

Graham Burton Hong Wa Yung

University of Cambridge

Martin Knofler

University of Vienna, Austria

Susan Fisher

University of California, SF, USA

Luana Paulesu Francesca Ietta

University of Siena, Italy