Annual GO Bond Program Report Fiscal Year 2015-16 Peg Stevenson, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

City and County of San Francisco Annual GO Bond Program Report Fiscal Year 2015-16 Peg Stevenson, Claire Phillips, David Weinzimmer Controller’s Office October 17, 2016

City and County of San Francisco Methodology • City Services Auditor (CSA) asked bond program lead departments Controller’s Office for scope, schedule, budget, and change order data as of March 31, 2016 • CSA interviewed bond program managers • Report summarizes information from data and interviews, and compares with performance from one year ago

2008 Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks City and County of San Francisco $185 million, 3 components (RPD & Port) • 92.3% of project budget 2008 CSNP - Budget & Expenditures expended $140 Controller’s Office Millions $120 • Overall bond program $100 $80 delayed by about 3 years; Original Budget $60 Expended $40 individual components $20 $0 delayed 3 to 5 years due to Citywide Neighborhood Waterfront Programs Parks Parks – Delays in regulatory approvals – Extended public outreach – Difficulty coordinating work with site staff

2012 Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks City and County of San Francisco $195 million, 4 components (RPD & Port) • 17% of project budget 2012 CSNP - Budget & Expenditures expended Controller’s Office $120 Millions $100 • Bond program delayed three $80 $60 months (2/2019 completion $40 Original Budget $20 Expended of Neighborhood Parks), $0 though most projects are not yet in construction • Crane Cove Park has absorbed budget of two cancelled Waterfront Parks projects

2008 SFGH Rebuild City and County of San Francisco $887.4 million, 1 component (Public Works) • 95% of project budget 2008 SFGH - Budget & Expenditures expended Controller’s Office $1,000 Millions $900 • Main hospital completed $800 $700 August 2015 (3 months $600 Original Budget $500 delayed) $400 Expended $300 • Remaining budget is funding $200 $100 four follow-on projects and $0 SFGH Rebuild project closeout items • Pre-bond funding for detailed scoping helped in delivering project under budget with only modest delays

2010 Earthquake Safety and City and County of San Francisco Emergency Response $412 million, 3 components (Public Works & SFPUC) • 80% of project budget 2010 ESER - Budget & Expenditures expended $300 Controller’s Office Millions $250 • Bond program and all $200 $150 components delayed by just Original Budget $100 Expended $50 over one year $- Public Safety Neighborhood Auxiliary Water Building (PSB) Fire Stations Supply System • Budget increases in (NFS) (AWSS) Neighborhood Fire Stations addressed by absorbing extra budget from Public Safety Building and moving one project to 2014 ESER program

2014 Earthquake Safety and City and County of San Francisco Emergency Response $400 million, 5 components (Public Works & SFPUC) • 10% of project budget 2014 ESER - Budget & Expenditures expended $180 Controller’s Office Millions $160 • Extension of 2010 ESER $140 $120 (adds Police Facilities, $100 Original Budget $80 Expended $60 Traffic Company/Forensic $40 $20 Services Division, Office of $- NFS EFWS Police TC&FSD Medical Chief Medical Examiner) Facilities Examiner • Bond program scheduled to be completed on time (12/2020); Office of Chief Medical Examiner delayed 7 months

2011 Road Repaving and Street Safety City and County of San Francisco $248 million, 5 components (Public Works & SFMTA) • 66% of project budget 2011 RRSS - Budget & Expenditures expended Controller’s Office $160 Millions $140 • Bond program delayed by $120 $100 about one year; individual $80 $60 Original Budget components delayed one to $40 Expended $20 $- three years • Major source of delays is interdepartmental coordination on repaving and extended public outreach process

2014 Transportation and Road Improvement City and County of San Francisco $500 million, 8 components (SFMTA) • 0.5% of project budget expended 2014 Transportation - Budget Controller’s Office $200 Millions • Bond program currently $160 $120 projected to be completed $80 $40 in December 2022 $0 • Bond program funds wide variety of transportation improvements; allocates largest portion of funds to Muni Forward transit improvements

City and County of San Francisco Lessons Learned Across Bond Programs • Pre-bond planning and scoping for SFGH helped keep the bond program on budget and close to schedule Controller’s Office • Surveys/studies of capital needs aided project prioritization for ESER and Transportation • For large projects, performance incentives should apply to both design and construction teams • If projects aren’t shovel-ready when funds are available, delays result; most common reasons: – need for regulatory clearance, – increased public outreach, or – interdepartmental coordination • Data tracking and reporting varies across departments

City and County of San Francisco Questions? Controller’s Office