angiography with i nvasive c oronary angiography
play

angiography with I nvasive C oronary angiography Ibrahim Danad, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P rospective comp A rison of C ard I ac PET/CT, SPECT/CT per F usion imaging and CT coronary angiography with I nvasive C oronary angiography Ibrahim Danad, Pieter G. Raijmakers, Roel S. Driessen, Jonathon Leipsic, Rekha Raju, Chris Naoum, Juhani


  1. P rospective comp A rison of C ard I ac PET/CT, SPECT/CT per F usion imaging and CT coronary angiography with I nvasive C oronary angiography Ibrahim Danad, Pieter G. Raijmakers, Roel S. Driessen, Jonathon Leipsic, Rekha Raju, Chris Naoum, Juhani Knuuti, Maija Maki, Richard Underwood, James K. Min, Kimberly Elmore, Wynand J. Stuijfzand, Niels van Royen, Igor I. Tulevski, Aernout G. Somsen, Marc C. Huisman. Arthur van Lingen, Martijn W. Heymans, Peter M. van de Ven, Cornelis van Kuijk 2 , Adriaan A. Lammertsma, Albert C. van Rossum, and Paul Knaapen* The PACIFIC-trial

  2. Aim of the study • To determine the diagnostic value, in a true head-to-head fashion, of CCTA, SPECT and PET imaging compared against Fractional Flow Reserve • To assess whether cardiac hybrid imaging has an incremental diagnostic value over stand- alone imaging

  3. Study design Day 1 Adenosine 99m-Tc 140 µg/kg/min LD LD Scout LD Calcium 256-slice CT Stress SPECT CT CT CT scoring CTCA Resting perfusion Stress perfusion 6 min. 2 min. 6 min. Contrast [ 15 O]H 2 O [ 15 O]H 2 O injection Day 2 99m-Tc LD Rest SPECT CT ICA + FFR

  4. Results - Diagnostic accuracy 100 94% 90% 89% 89% 87% 88% CCTA 85% 84% 81% 74%77% 80 SPECT 73% Percentage (%) 64% PET 60% 57% 60 40 20 0 Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV Accuracy

  5. Results - Diagnostic accuracy hybrid imaging 97% 100 94% 92% Hybrid SPECT/CCTA 88% 84% 82% Hybrid PET/CCTA 76% 80 74% Percentage (%) 71% 60 50% 40 20 0 Sensitivity Specificity NPV PPV Accuracy

  6. Conclusion • This first prospective head-to-head comparative trial revealed PET to exhibit the highest accuracy for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood • A combined anatomical and functional assessment does not add incremental diagnostic value and guides clinical decision-making in an unsalutary fashion

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend