Andreev and Majorana bound states in quantum dots Alfredo Levy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

andreev and majorana
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Andreev and Majorana bound states in quantum dots Alfredo Levy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Andreev and Majorana bound states in quantum dots Alfredo Levy Yeyati In collaboration with: Alvaro Martn-Rodero, Bernd Braunecker (UAM) Reinhold Egger, Alex Zazunov, Roland Htzen (Dusseldorf) Exp results: Philippe Joyez (Saclay)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Andreev and Majorana bound states in quantum dots

Alfredo Levy Yeyati

Chernogolovka 13/09/2012

In collaboration with: Alvaro Martín-Rodero, Bernd Braunecker (UAM) Reinhold Egger, Alex Zazunov, Roland Hützen (Dusseldorf) Exp results: Philippe Joyez (Saclay)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

S

QW Effect of e-e interactions Charging energy in QD regime Andreev states spectroscopy in CNTs J.D. Pillet et al. Nature Phys. (2010) Search for Majorana states in semiconducting nanowires

  • V. Mourik et al. Science (2012)

e h 2e

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline Andreev states in QDs Majorana bound states in QDs

The superconducting Anderson model Experimental results – Fit by model calculations NRG vs mean field results The single charge Majorana transistor Transport properties: Known limits Weak blockade regime General Green functions formalism Zero band width limit Equation of motion method Master equation approach

Conclusions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

QD regime: the superconducting Anderson model

. c . h c c e c c H

k k k / i k k , k k R , L

 

    

         2

R L k , k k

H H . c . h d c t n n U n H       

      

 

Single Level

   

L

R

U  0

 2  2

R L R L

eV , , , U , ,        

Equilibrium (V=0): Kondo vs Pairing

Energy scale : ~  Energy scale : ~ kb TK

crossover

 

K

T

p-junction behavior!

Review: A. Martín-Rodero & ALY, Adv. Phys. (2011)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Spectral properties: Andreev bound states

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Experimental results: gate voltage dependence

slide-7
SLIDE 7

R L k , k k

H H . c . h d c t n n U n H       

      

 

ABS in SC Anderson model: Hartree Fock approximation

HF approx.

     

      d d U n U

ind

     

  ind ex

E

Minimal model Breaking spin symmetry

   

     n n

(pheonomenological parameter)

  • 1,0
  • 0,5

0,0 0,5 1,0

  • 0,50
  • 0,25

0,00 0,25 0,50

  • 0,50
  • 0,25

0,00 0,25 0,50

  • 1,0
  • 0,5

0,0 0,5 1,0

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0

  • 1,0
  • 0,5

0,0 0,5 1,0

0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0

  • 0,50
  • 0,25

0,00 0,25 0,50

E/

I/(4pe/h) I/(4pe/h) I/(4pe/h)

E/ E/

/p /p

 2 Eex

    5 .   25 0. Eex   75 0. Eex   50 1. Eex

  • E. Vecino, A. Martín-Rodero, A. Levy Yeyati, PRB 68, 035105 (2003)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fitting the experimental data: gate voltage dependence

Exp. Model

J.D. Pillet, Ch. Quay, C. Bena, A. Levy Yeyati and P. Joyez, Nature Phys. (2010)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ABS in SC Anderson model: Mean field vs “exact” results

  • A. Martín-Rodero & ALY, J. Phys: Cond. Matter (2012)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Numerical Renomalization Group: basic ideas

D Logarithmic discretization Map into semi-infinite chain Iterative diagonalization Truncation: #states <

V

1

V

2

V

4

V

2 / N N

V

 

c

N

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Dashed: HF, Full: NRG p phase: 4 ABSs

ABS: HF vs NRG results

300 4   

c

N

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Dashed: HF, Full: NRG p phase

ABS: HF vs NRG results

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Symmetric case

Dashed: HF, Full: NRG

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Quantum dots with Majonana bound states

  • A. Zazunov, ALY & R. Egger, PRB (2011)
  • R. Hützen, A. Zazunov, B. Braunecker, ALY & R. Egger, arXiv:1206.3912
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Majorana generation: induced superconductivity in normal or topological semiconducting wires

Review: J. Alicea, arXiv:1202.1293

  • R. Egger, A. Zazunov, and ALY, PRL (2010)

Helical states in TI nanowires

  • V. Mourik et al. (Delft) Science (2012)
slide-16
SLIDE 16

The Majorana Single Charge Transistor

“Non-local” fermion Cooper pairs number

gL gR

T E

R L c

, ,

,

  

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Bolech & Demler, PRL (2007) “resonant Andreev reflection”

Known limits

  • L. Fu, PRL (2010)

“electron teleportation”

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • A. Zazunov, A.L.Y. & R. Egger, PRB (2011)

Model Hamiltonian Equivalent representation: Cooper pairs + d fermion

) , ( ) 1 , ( N N 

“normal” e tunneling

) 1 , 1 ( ) , (   N N

“anomalous” tunneling (Cooper pair splitting)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Weak blockade regime

Relevant dregree of freedom Keldysh path integral formulation

  • A. Zazunov, A.L.Y. & R. Egger, PRB (2011)

Second order expansion equivalent to semi-classical Langevin equation Current in “P(E)” form

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Keldysh GFs formulation: general current formula

Define Nambu spinors Exact current formula!

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Linear conductance: evaluation within ZBWM

R

L

 d

  d

e i

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Evaluation using EOM (Equation of Motion method)

Truncation Self-consistency

slide-23
SLIDE 23

EOM results

e-spectral density “h”-spectral density

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Crossover of peak conductance

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Finite temperature: Master equation approach

Q Q+1 Q+2 Q-1 Q-2

) ( 1 , seq Q Q j  

) ( 1 , seq Q Q j  

) ( 2 , ' , AR Q Q j j  

) ( , EC Q Q j 

) ( 2 , ' , AR Q Q j j  

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Results from Master equation approach

CB oscillations Peak conductance

  2 T

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Finite voltage sideband peaks

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Conclusions

* Validity of mean field (HFA): good agreement with NRG for

Andreev bound states in QDs Majorana Single Charge Transistor

* Crossover of peak conductance from 2e2 /h to e2/h as a function of Ec/ * Coulomb blockade oscillations and side band peaks in non-linear conductance * Work in progress: consequences for non-local transport (crossed Andreev) * Qualitative description of CNTs results using phenomenological models * Insight from several different methods (WB, ZBWM, EOM, ME)

K

T  