and use of neonicotinoid pesticides Christy A. Morrissey Christy A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

and use of neonicotinoid pesticides
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

and use of neonicotinoid pesticides Christy A. Morrissey Christy A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Environmental concerns over the registration and use of neonicotinoid pesticides Christy A. Morrissey Christy A. Morrissey, PhD Associate Professor, Biology and School of Associate Professor Environment and Sustainability History of Pesticide


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Environmental concerns over the registration and use of neonicotinoid pesticides

Christy A. Morrissey, PhD Associate Professor

Christy A. Morrissey Associate Professor, Biology and School of Environment and Sustainability

slide-2
SLIDE 2

One farmer supplies 25.8 people Total US pesticide use 617M lbs/year (1964) OCs leading insecticides One farmer supplies 47.7 people Total US pesticide use 760M lbs/year (1970) One farmer supplies 75.7 people Total US pesticide use 1,121M lbs/year (1980) Peak pesticide use; OPs leading insecticides One farmer supplies 100 people1 Total US pesticide use 949M lbs/year (1990)2 Roundup Ready™ GMO crops (1996) Total US pesticide use 926M lbs/yr (2000); 857M lbs/yr (2007) Neonicotinoids leading insecticides

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 History of Pesticide Use in North America

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The latest evolution in insecticides: Neonicotinoids

3

  • Sold in 120 countries
  • Registered for use on 140 crops
  • 80% of global market share of seed treatments
  • 30% of the insecticide market (Jeschke et al 2011)
slide-4
SLIDE 4

224 studies, 62% of total

Neonicotinoid published papers

“The Science is too uncertain”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bee studies dominate literature and headlines

Lab experiments: >150 studies to bees

  • Chronic exposure causes lethality and effects on foraging, learning,

memory behaviour at low environmentally relevant concentrations

  • Stress from mites, parasites and disease lowers the toxicity thresholds

Field studies: several published field studies have shown negative effects leading to colony collapse, but some key issues around experimental design

Godfray et al. 2014 Proc Roy Soc B

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Neonic Environmental Is Issues Debated

  • Scale of Use
  • Persistence
  • Soil organisms
  • Water contamination
  • Aquatic insects
  • Birds
  • Bees and other insect

pollinators

  • Crop protection needs
  • Economic gains/losses
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Scale of Use

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Main et al 2014

1.0

In Canadian Prairies, 99% of canola is treated with neonicotinoids. We conservatively estimate 11 million ha or >215,000 kg total neonicotinoids applied annually (Main et al. 2014 PlosOne)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Neonicotinoid use in the United States exceeds 2 million kg/year

USGS National Water-Quality Assessment Program Pesticide National Synthesis Project Douglas and Tooker 2015 ES&T

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Environmental Persistence and Water Contamination

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Neonicotinoids contaminate whole ecosystem

Sanchez-Bayo 2014: “The problem with neonicotinoids”

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Properties of f Neonicotinoid in insecticides

Extended half life in soil High water solubility Stable to hydrolysis, Photolysis

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • In the Prairies: 16-91% of wetlands sampled contained at least 1 neonicotinoid

(Main et al. 2014)

  • Over 50% had >1 neonicotinoid (evidence of synergism)
  • Peak conc. clothianidin = 3.3 μg/L ,thiamethoxam = 1.5 μg/L
  • Detections were frequent in spring before seeding occurs
  • Routine detections in surface waters across Canada and worldwide
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Can these levels cause harm?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Toxicity to Aquatic invertebrates

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Cloeon dipterum Chironomus dilutus Heptageniidae spp. Chironomus tentans Culex pipiens Cheumatopsyche brevilineata Simulium latigonium Notidobia ciliaris Simulium vittatum Aedes taeniorhynchus Plea minutissima Limnephilidae spp. Micronecta spp. Chironomus riparius Mysidopsis bahia Sympetrum striolatum Chaoborus obscuripes Pteronarcys dorsata Americamysis bahia Tipula spp. Aedes aegypti Hyalella azteca Anopheles gambiae Gammarus pulex Asellus aquaticus Culex quinquefasciatus Palaemonetes pugio Aedes albopictus Cypridopsis vidua Cypretta seurati Ilyocypris dentifera Sialis lutaria Gammarus fossarum Orconectes nais Notonecta spp. Daphnia magna Chydorus sphaericus Epeorus longimanus Caenis horaria Chironomus tepperi Ceriodaphnia dubia

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.000 0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000

Proportion of species affected Standardized neonicotinoid conc. (µmol/L imidacloprid)

Cheumatopsyche

Crustaceans Insects

Community effect thresholds

Neonicotinoid acute toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Morrissey et al in 2015 Environment International

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Wetland Water Neonicotinoid Concentrations in Saskatchewan

Chronic aquatic toxicity threshold 35 ng/L (0.035 µg/L)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Worldwide Exceedance of Acute and Chronic ic threshold concentrations in surface waters

**81% (22/27) studies exceeded acute threshold of 0.2 µg/L **74% (14/19) studies exceeded chronic threshold of 0.035 µg/L

Morrissey et al. 2015 Environ International

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cloeon dipterum Chironomus dilutus Heptageniidae spp. Chironomus tentans Culex pipiens Cheumatopsyche brevilineata Simulium latigonium Notidobia ciliaris Simulium vittatum Aedes taeniorhynchus Plea minutissima Limnephilidae spp. Micronecta spp. Chironomus riparius Mysidopsis bahia Sympetrum striolatum Chaoborus obscuripes Pteronarcys dorsata Americamysis bahia Tipula spp. Aedes aegypti Hyalella azteca Anopheles gambiae Gammarus pulex Asellus aquaticus Culex quinquefasciatus Palaemonetes pugio Aedes albopictus Cypridopsis vidua Cypretta seurati Ilyocypris dentifera Sialis lutaria Gammarus fossarum Orconectes nais Notonecta spp. Daphnia magna Chydorus sphaericus Epeorus longimanus Caenis horaria Chironomus tepperi Ceriodaphnia dubia

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0.000 0.001 0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000

Proportion of species affected Standardized neonicotinoid conc. (µmol/L imidacloprid)

Cheumatopsyche

Crustaceans Insects

Community effect thresholds

Neonicotinoid acute toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Morrissey et al in 2015 Environment International

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Effects on insectivorous and seed eating birds

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Swallow Reproduction similar

across sites

  • Insect diet is primarily aquatic
  • rigin- swallows are very selective

though nestlings are fed a larger range of prey

  • High aquatic insect food supply was

physiologically important for reducing oxidative stress

What are Tree swallows are telling us about the quality of Prairie farmland?

4 year study….

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Crop intensive sites:

  • Higher wetland neonicotinoid

concentrations

  • Poorer nestling body condition
  • Increased foraging rates and time

spent away from nestbox

  • Lower adult return rates
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Exposure to imidacloprid (but not chlorpyrifos) caused significant decrease in WCSP body mass

  • M. Eng et al. unpublished data

LD50 HOSP= 41mg/kg Equivalent to eating 0.3 corn seeds/day or 3.8 canola seeds/day

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Causes of Avian mortality in Canada

Calvert et al. 2013 Avian Conserv and Ecol

Pesticide kills

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Neonicotinoid Is Issues Debated

More controversial Least controversial

  • Scale of Use
  • Persistence
  • Water contamination
  • Soil organisms
  • Aquatic insects
  • Birds
  • Bees and other insect

pollinators

  • Crop protection needs
  • Economic gains/losses
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Crop Protection Needs

slide-27
SLIDE 27

USEPA 2014 Report “Benefits of Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments to Soybean Production”

  • “Across the United States (2008-2012), 1,151,000 pounds of

imidacloprid and thiamethoxam were used as seed treatments on soybeans”. page 4

  • “This analysis provides evidence that U.S. soybean growers derive

limited to no benefit from neonicotinoid seed treatments in most

  • instances. Published data indicate that most usage of neonicotinoid

seed treatments does not protect soybean yield any better than doing no pest control.” page 13

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Goulson 2013. J Applied Ecology

Annual use of neonics in UK Annual production of wheat and

  • ilseed rape

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

FRANCE banned neonicotinoid use on sunflower and maize since 2004…

  • Productivity was not affected, yields peaked in

2007

  • EU placed 2 year moratorium on neonicotinoids

with no unusual yield losses reported

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Jan 6, 2016 Health Canada announces “no potential risk to bees” from

seed treatments of neonicotinoids. Risks to wild pollinators still being considered.

SO what’s the latest in the regulatory world…

2017 Ontario (and possibly Quebec) plan to roll out enforcement for 80%

reduction in neonicotinoid use to protect pollinator health

June 1, 2016 Health

Canada no longer grants new conditional registrations for pesticides (neonics are almost all conditional)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

November 23, 2016 Health Canada announced plan to phase out imidacloprid in 3-5 years because of risks to aquatic ecosystems

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Lets talk about other solutions…

It’s not enough to just ban 1 chemical!!!

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Interested in participating in research on sustainable conservation farming??? Christy.morrissey@usask.ca Thank you!!!

Funding:

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Consequences of intensive agricultural practices dependent on insecticide seed treatments

  • Resistance in target pests
  • Outbreaks of nontarget pests
  • Long term soil degradation and crop yields
  • Increasing farm input costs
  • Water and soil pollution with detrimental effects to invertebrate diversity
  • Direct and cascading indirect effects to wildlife (including birds)
slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • 1. Reduce mechanical soil

disturbance and focus on soil quality

  • 2. Cultivate a wider range of

natural and managed species, crop varieties, cover crops, intercrops to increase resiliency

  • 3. Use Integrated Pest

Management of pests, disease and weeds

  • 4. Maintain and restore wetland

and riparian areas and use water efficient crops

Solution: “Conservation/ Ecological Agriculture”

Save and Grow: A policymaker’s guide to the sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production