AND AGROECOLOGICAL 1 Lets write te a a But What review iew - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AND AGROECOLOGICAL 1 Lets write te a a But What review iew - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May 23, 2023 173 likes •392 views

Picture: www.fromquarkstoquasars.com YOU WILL BE MULTIDISCIPLINARY AND AGROECOLOGICAL 1 Lets write te a a But What review iew paper per on on does es it it mean?? ?? Agroecolo roecology ! 2 Incorporate Agroecology within

slide-1
SLIDE 1

YOU WILL BE MULTIDISCIPLINARY AND AGROECOLOGICAL

Picture: www.fromquarkstoquasars.com

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Let’s write te a a review iew paper per on

  • n

Agroecolo roecology ! But… What does es it it mean?? ??

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Séverin HATT, Sidonie ARTRU, Fanny BOERAEVE, David BREDART Ludivine LASSOIS, Sarah GARRE, Marc DUFRENE, Nicolas DENDONCKER, Pierre STASSART, Frédéric FRANCIS

Incorporate Agroecology within research

The ongoing story of four young researchers…

4th BELGIAN AGROECOLOGY MEETING – BRUSSELS – 5th November 2014

3

Picture: www.trendhunter.com

slide-4
SLIDE 4

► Various disciplines

(Tomich et al., 2011)

What Agroecology suggests

Pi cutres: S. Hatt / Google Earth / olitriathlon.fr

It warns against one-fits-all solutions

► Combine methods ► Cross scales

AND

► Multiple stakeholders

(Lyon et al., 2011) (Doré et al., 2011) (Mac Millan & Benton, 2014) 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Initial plan

Ho How pu putting tting ag agroec

  • ecol
  • logica
  • gical

l prin incip iple les s in into to pr practice tice ?

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Interdisciplinary seminar

Objectivism Constructivism Holism Reductionism Technocentric Ecocentric Holocentric

T1 T2 T3

(Steyeart, 2014) (Bawden, 1997)

The Earth: www.how-to-draw-funny-cartoons.com

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ho How now

  • w do

does it it chall llenge enge ou

  • ur

way of

  • f doi
  • ing resear

earch ch?

2.Question our posture

  • f research?
  • 1. Translate a societal issue into

a scientific problem?

  • 3. Implication in terms of

methodologies?

7

Picture: PhDcomics.com

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 1. Translate a societal issue into a

scientific problem?

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Case: Ecosystem services (ES) in agriculture

Translate a societal issue into a scientific problem?

T’s: Field thesis committee

T1 T2 T3

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Bawden ‘Window on the world’ matrix

(Bawden, 1997)

Objectivism Contextualism Holism Reductionism Technocentric Ecocentric Holocentric

Tool used: the framework of ES

  • Biophysical ES valuation
  • Social ES valuation

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2.Question our posture of research?

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Case: Learning processes

Question our posture of research?

Coordination – biodiversity and farming Transformative BUT Posture Comprehensive BUT Topic Farmers searching for autonomy Locked in public policies

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bawden ‘Window on the world’ matrix

Objectivism Contextualism Holism Reductionism Technocentric Ecocentric Holocentric

(Bawden, 1997)

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 3. Implication in terms of

methodologies?

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Case: Agroforestry system in Belgium

Modeling

Implications in terms of methodologies?

Quantification of process

Agronomic field experiment

Management tool

Pictures: S. Artru

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Objectivism Contextualism Holism Reductionism Technocentric Ecocentric Holocentric

Bawden ‘Window on the world’ matrix

(Bawden, 1997)

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Experimental design

Case: Wildflower strips for controling pests

Implications in terms of methodologies?

Opimizing flower mix composition How farming context affect wildflower strips implementation

Semi-directive surveys

Pictures: S. Hatt

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Bawden ‘Window on the world’ matrix

Objectivism Contextualism Holism Reductionism Technocentric Ecocentric Holocentric

( Bawden, 1997 )

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusion

Objectivism Contextualism Holism Reductionism Technocentric Ecocentric Holocentric

(Bawden, 1997)

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

For more information

Séverin Hatt (severin.hatt@ulg.ac.be) Sidonie Artru (sidonie.artru@ulg.ac.be) Fanny Boeraeve (f.boeraeve@ulg.ac.be) David Brédart (dbredart@ulg.ac.be)

THANK YOU !

Picture: S. Hatt

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

▪ Bawden R. (1997). The Community Challenge: The Learning Response. Presentation made at the 29th Annual International Meeting of the Community Development Society, Athens Georgia. ▪ Doré T., Makowski D., Malézieux E., Munier-Jolain N., Tchamitchian M., & Tittonell P. (2011). Facing up to the paradigm of ecological intensification in agronomy: Revisiting methods, concepts and knowledge. European Journal of Agronomy, 34 (4), p. 197–210. ▪ Lyon A., Bell M. M., Gratton C., & Jackson R. (2011). Farming without a recipe: Wisconsin graziers and new directions for agricultural science. Journal of Rural Studies, 27 (4), p. 384–393. ▪ MacMillan T., & Benton T. G. (2014). Agriculture: Engage farmers in research. Nature, 509 (7498), p. 25–27. ▪ Steyeart, P. (2014). Personal communication. ▪ Tomich T. P., Brodt S., Ferris H., Galt R., Horwath W. R., Kebreab E., Leveau J. H. J., Liptzin D., Lubell M., Merel P., Michelmore R., Rosenstock T., Scow K., Six J., Williams N., & Yang L. (2011). Agroecology: A Review from a Global-Change Perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36 (1), p. 193–222.

References

21