amplitude analysis in hadron spectroscopy
play

Amplitude Analysis in Hadron Spectroscopy Csar Fernndez-Ramrez - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Amplitude Analysis in Hadron Spectroscopy Csar Fernndez-Ramrez JPAC/Jefferson Lab Joint Physics Analysis Center G. Fox E. Passemar A. Jackura A.P . Szczepaniak M. Dring V. Mathieu L.-Y. Dai D. Schott P . Guo R. Workman JPAC


  1. Amplitude Analysis in Hadron Spectroscopy César Fernández-Ramírez JPAC/Jefferson Lab

  2. Joint Physics Analysis Center G. Fox E. Passemar A. Jackura A.P . Szczepaniak M. Döring V. Mathieu L.-Y. Dai D. Schott P . Guo R. Workman JPAC M. Shi I.V. Danilkin C. Fernández-Ramírez V. Mokeev M.R. Pennington ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015 � 2

  3. Why is QCD special? � A single theory is responsible for phenomena at distance scales of the order of 10 -15 m as well as of the order 10 4 m. � It builds from objects (quarks and gluons) that do not exist in a common sense. >90% mass comes from interactions! � Predicts existence of exotic matter, e.g. made from radiation (glueballs,hybrids) or novel plasmas. � A possible template for physics beyond the Standard Model � It is challenging! ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  4. This talk is about hadrons 1909/1911 Rutherford/Geiger/Marsden discover the nucleus 1919 Rutherford discovers the proton 1932 Chadwick discovers the neutron ρ : Anderson (1960) K - -> π + π - π - ρ : Erwin (1961) φ : Connolly. Pevsner (1962) η : Pevsner (1961) π : Powell (1947) ω : Álvarez (1961) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  5. “Bare (free)” particles of QCD: quarks and gluons e.g. as seen in high energy collisions analogous to 8 (color) x 6 (flavor) copies of QED: quark → electron gluon → photon (but non-abelian) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  6. e QCD ~ 10 e QED quarks bound in hadrons the nature of physical quarks and gluons “free” quarks remains a mystery inverse distance between quarks ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  7. Quark models K* + K* 0 ω 1 • Click to add text ρ - ρ + ρ 0 ω 8 K* - K* 0 physical quarks appear to move in a kind of “mean, gluonic field” ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  8. Plausible model? H QCD = H c.h.o. + non-linear “physical quarks” → quasi particles in gluon mean field finite energy, localized solutions: solitons (monopoles, vortices , ...) gluon mean field The QCD vacuum is not empty. Rather it contains quantum fluctuations in the gluon field at all scales. (Image: University of “physical gluons” → Adelaide) mean field AND quasi particles ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  9. Confinement in QCD Adiabatic potential Absence of isolated quarks Properties of confinement: • Linearly rising potential • Regge trajectories • String behavior r 0 = 0.5 fm ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  10. Spectroscopy of Hadrons can • Click to add text teach us about “workings” of QCD 1. Hadrons with gluon excitations (confinement) 2. Hadron molecules (residual forces) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  11. • Click to add text ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  12. Lattice meson spectrum [Dudek 2011] • Click to add text ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  13. Lattice meson spectrum [Dudek 2011] • Click to add text ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  14. Lattice meson spectrum [Dudek 2011] • Click to add text ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  15. Lattice meson spectrum [Dudek 2011] • Click to add text ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  16. Lattice meson spectrum [Dudek 2011] • Click to add text ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  17. • Strong, theoretical evidence (lattice) for gluon field excitations in hadron spectrum • Phenomenologically, gluons behave as axial vector, quasiparticles J PC =1 +- • Lowest multiplet of “hybrid mesons” has J PC = 0 -+ , 1 -+ , 2 -+ , 1 -- states • What about other non-quark model possibilities? • Can these be detected and distinguished? ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  18. New opportunities High statistics new beam-target combinations polarization measurements ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  19. What kind of experiments? 2 → 2, 3 processes π , K γ π , K π η , ω , ϕ π π , K π π , K γ p p p p π , K π , K N, Δ , Σ , Λ p p γ γ , π , K π , K ϕ γ , π , K N, Δ , Σ , Λ π , K p p p p ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  20. Evolution in statistics π - p → π - π + π - p BNL (E852) ca 1995 CERN ca. 1970 • Click to add text O(10 2 /10MeV ) O(10 3 /10MeV ) E852 (Full sample) COMPASS 2010 O(10 6 /10MeV ) O(10 5 /10MeV ) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  21. Resonance paradigm: Δ (1232) In 1952, Fermi and collaborators π + p → π + p measured the cross section peak in intensity and found it steeply raising. (cross section) mass ~ 30% above proton ∆ ++ width Γ lifetime ~ 4.5 x 10 -24 s width ~ lifetime -1 = 150 MeV ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  22. How do we catch resonances? • Is every bump a resonance? • Is every resonance a bump? – The answer to both questions is NO • Examples – σ meson in ππ scattering has a broad structure – Threshold effects can appear as resonances ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  23. Actually, what is a resonance? • A resonance is a pole of the scattering amplitude in the unphysical Riemann sheets ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  24. 
 • 12 GeV upgrade at JLab: CLAS, GlueX, etc. – Aim: ✑ Complete understanding of the hadron spectrum ✑ discover new resonances e.g, gluonic excitations (states 
 where glue builds their J PC ) – Tools: Amplitude analysis of data 
 E To find new resonances not bump-hunting, but search for poles 
 must build in S-Matrix constraints 
 + state-of-the-art knowledge 
 of reaction dynamics resonance pole Dispersive analytic continuation ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  25. 
 • 12 GeV upgrade at JLab: CLAS, GlueX, etc. – Aim: ✑ Complete understanding of the hadron spectrum ✑ discover new resonances e.g, gluonic excitations (states 
 where glue builds their J PC ) – Tools: Amplitude analysis of data 
 To find new resonances not bump-hunting, but search for poles 
 must build in S-Matrix constraints 
 + state-of-the-art knowledge 
 Hadron spectrum, exotics of reaction dynamics Experimental Data ChPT + Analyticity + Unitarity FFs, resonance 
 CLAS, GlueX, JEF, Dispersion Relations parameters: M R , 
 COMPASS, BESS, 
 Regge Theory, Models Γ Ρ , couplings LHCb, PANDA,… ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  26. Scattering theory • S matrix S = I + 2 i ρ T • S is unitary (probability conservation) S † S = I Disc T = Im T = T † ρ T • T is an analytical function (causality) • T has branch cuts at thresholds (several Riemann sheets) • T has no poles in the first Riemann sheet ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  27. Dispersion theory • Cauchy Theorem Im{ ν } I Riemann 1 t ( ⇥ 0 ) Z sheet ⇥ 0 − ⇥ − i � d ⇥ 0 t ( ⇥ + i � ) = 2 ⇤ i C ν +i ε • Amplitude has no complex poles in the 1st Riemann Re{ ν } sheet and has two branch cuts • We can reconstruct the full amplitude in the whole complex plane ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  28. Example: Breit-Wigner amplitude M A I ( s ) = M 2 − s − iMq I ( s ) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  29. Example: Breit-Wigner amplitude M A I ( s ) = M 2 − s − iMq I ( s ) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  30. Riemann sheets � { s } • The amount of I t I � ( s ) Riemann sheets � { s } s 1 s 2 depends on the 0 t III s p ( s ) � III number of open s 0 p t II � ( s ) II channels: 2 N t I � ( s ) I ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  31. Amplitude analysis: ππ scattering Peláez et al. F ( s, t = t 0 ) Im ( s ) I • Click to add text s 0 = 4 m 2 I=0 Re ( s ) ρ (770) I II σ (500) 1. Parametrize the data 2. Check constrains (unitarity) 3. Continuation to extract the pole I=1 4. Interpretation (hybrid, glueball, tetraquark, ...) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  32. γ p → K + K - p Amplitude depends on 5 Mandelstam variables: • One is fixed: s • Two are measured: s K+K- and s K-p • Two are integrated out: t γ K+ and t pp’ K + t γ K + γ s K + K − fixed s K − s K − p p 0 p t pp 0 ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  33. Interesting channels GlueX (Hall D@JLab) invariant mass range 2-3 GeV Glueballs? X ππ , K ¯ ρ , ρ 3 , φ , φ 3 , f 0 , f 2 , f 0 K X = 2 , a 0 , a 2 πη , πη 0 X = a 0 , a 2 , π 1 Hybrid? ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  34. K + K - Dalitz plot Phi mesons W = 5 GeV 22 Double Regge 20 18 16 14 K − p 12 M 2 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 M 2 + K − K Disclaimer: not actual data Hyperons (actual data from g12 CLAS@JLab under analysis) ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  35. K + K - Dalitz plot W = 5 GeV Meson 22 Double Regge 20 18 16 14 K − p 12 M 2 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 M 2 + K − K Hyperon ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  36. Things we expect/hope to study • Exotics – new physics that will help us understand the role of the gluon and confinement • Strangeonia ( s ¯ s ) – this spectrum is not well studied and looks pretty empty. Also information on gluons and virtual quarks • Hyperons – Strange content of hadrons, impact in hypernuclei physic and strangeness in neutron stars ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

  37. Models • Dual model (B5) – Generalization of the Veneziano model – In the double-Regge limit: Shi et al., PRD91, 034007 (2015) • Deck model – More elaborated – Resonance region: K-matrix, coupled channels – High energy: Regge – Connection through dispersion theory ICN-UNAM Seminar, March 18, 2015

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend