AMOC Mean (1988 2007) in Depth Space Danabasoglu et al. (2014) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

amoc mean 1988 2007 in depth space
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AMOC Mean (1988 2007) in Depth Space Danabasoglu et al. (2014) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CORE II AMOC Mean (1988 2007) in Depth Space Danabasoglu et al. (2014) Reanalysis AMOC time mean (1961 2007) Karspeck et al. (2016) CORE II AMOC EOF1 No detrending Danabasoglu et al. (2016) Reanalysis AMOC Standard Deviation (1961


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AMOC Mean (1988‐2007) in Depth Space

Danabasoglu et al. (2014)

CORE‐II

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AMOC time mean (1961‐2007)

Karspeck et al. (2016)

Reanalysis

slide-3
SLIDE 3

AMOC EOF1

No detrending

Danabasoglu et al. (2016)

CORE‐II

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AMOC Standard Deviation (1961‐2007)

Karspeck et al. (2016)

Reanalysis

slide-5
SLIDE 5

AMOC Maximum Transport Anomaly Time Series

26.5oN 45oN

Danabasoglu et al. (2016)

CORE‐II

slide-6
SLIDE 6

45°N 26.5°N

Annual‐Mean AMOC variability at 1000 m Depth

Karspeck et al. (2016)

Reanalysis

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Karspeck et al. (2015)

HDInit forecasts > the ‘no‐skill’ statistical reference forecast at the 90 % confidence level

Average Anomaly Correlation Coefficients for SST

AND > the uninitialized run at a 90 % confidence

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SST Hindcasts and Skill

HDInit and DAInit Solid black: HADISST Gray: NoInit (20C) Gray dashed: no‐skill Green dashed: LIM Gray‐green: Noinit

Karspeck et al. (2015)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Groups that have Contributed AMOC Reanalyses from 1960 – 2007 (or longer)

GROUP METHOD INSITU T/S ALT SST NoAssim Control run? Atm forcing DP INIT? GECCO2 (U. Hamburg) 4DVAR YES YES YES YES [NCEP]* YES ORAS4 (ECMWF) NEMOVAR 3DVar YES YES YES YES ERA‐ 40/ERA‐I YES MOVE‐CORE (MRI) 3DVar YES NO NO YES CORE II IAF NO SODA (TAMU / U.Maryland) OI YES NO YES YES 20‐CR YES DePreSys (UKMET) Coupled nudging to OI product YES NO YES NO N/A YES ECDA3.2 (GFDL) coupled EaKF YES INDIRECTLY YES NO [NCEP]* YES Karspeck et al. (2016)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Groups that have Contributed AMOC Reanalyses from 1960 – 2007 (or longer)

GROUP METHOD INSITU T/S ALT SST NoAssim Control run? Atm forcing DP INIT? GECCO2‐REF (U. Hamburg) 4DVAR YES YES YES YES NCEP YES ORAS4‐CNTRL (ECMWF) NEMOVAR 3DVar YES YES YES YES ERA‐ 40/ERA‐I YES MRI‐CORE (MRI) 3DVar YES NO NO YES CORE II IAF NO SODA‐NOASSIM (TAMU / U.Maryland) OI YES NO YES YES 20‐CR YES

Four groups also contributed “No Assimilation” simulations to help understand the role of data constraints.

Karspeck et al. (2016)