Ammar Karkar 1 , Kenneth Tong 2 , Raed Al-Dujaily 1 , Alex Yakovlev 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ammar karkar 1 kenneth tong 2 ra ed al dujaily 1
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ammar Karkar 1 , Kenneth Tong 2 , Raed Al-Dujaily 1 , Alex Yakovlev 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ammar Karkar 1 , Kenneth Tong 2 , Raed Al-Dujaily 1 , Alex Yakovlev 1 and Terrence Mak 3 (1)Newcastle University, (2) University College London, (3)The Chinese University of Hong Kong Introduction Surface wave Hybrid architecture


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ammar Karkar1, Kenneth Tong2, Ra’ed Al-Dujaily1 , Alex Yakovlev1 and Terrence Mak3

(1)Newcastle University, (2) University College London, (3)The Chinese University of Hong Kong

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

 Scalability is the issue:

  • System-on-chip
  • Network-on-chip
  • Global communication
  • Alternative communication fabric

10/12/2012 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Why surface wave :

  • Lower cost to implement:

 Does not require non-CMOS devices to be integrated (e.g. Optical Interconnect)  less industrial challenges(e.g. 3D technology)

  • Consume less power than wireless RF
  • Provide one-to-many communication unlike(RF

waveguide transmission lines)

10/12/2012 6

Surface wave (less power) (one-to-many) Wireless (one-to-many) Waveguide (less power)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 Off-chip seems to be the better option for three

reasons:

  • lower implementation cost and mitigate area overhead
  • used for both inter/intra-chip communication
  • propagation speed, close to the speed of light (air as

dielectric material)

10/12/2012 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Shared media and limited number of frequency channels  wire based local communication:

  • scale well with technology
  • cheapest implementation cost

 Hybrid multilayer Network:

10/12/2012 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Proposed surface acts as wave guide of the

propagated signal:

  • 𝑊+ 𝑒 = 𝑊+ 0 𝑓−𝛽𝑒 (1)
  • 𝑇21 = 𝐹 + 20 log 𝑓−𝛽𝑒 (2)

10/12/2012 11

α ≈ 6.33 E ≈ -23.8

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

NoC component Baseline Architecture SWI Hybrid Architecture (proposed) RF-I with transmission line Router (mm2) 1.08533 1.51237 1.51237 RF circuit (mm2)

  • 0.408

0.463 Link (mm2)

  • 0.17152

active area overhead rate to baseline arch.(% of total die) 2.29% 2.3%

10/12/2012 13

 Area overhead consideration for the proposed Interconnect fabric

slide-14
SLIDE 14

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10/12/2012 15

6×4 Network average delay vs. PIR for Hybrid and Baseline Architecture 6×4 Network Throughput vs. PIR for Hybrid and Baseline Architecture

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10/12/2012 16

  • Hybrid-Arch. PIR and throughput improvement over

Baseline Arch. At the edge of Network Saturation

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Random Transpose Butterfly Shuffle Hotspot1 Hotspot2 Bitreversal Improvem vement ent(% (%) Traffic ic PIR Throughput

slide-17
SLIDE 17

10/12/2012 17

 Normalized Power consumption vs. Baseline architecture for

Different NoC size, traffic

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 Introduction  Surface wave  Hybrid architecture  Analysis of link power dissipation  Area estimation  Preliminary results  Conclusion

10/12/2012 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 Scalability issues in global communication  Hybrid architecture (metal and SWI for local and

global Communication, respectively)

 Significant potential of the proposed architecture

to mitigate these issues with relatively small area penalty

 Future work includes developing an optimized

topology on design time or on the fly, as well as, investigating 1-to-M/M-to-1 traffic pattern for this fabric.

10/12/2012 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

10/12/2012 20