Allocating resources to enhance resilience Cameron MacKenzie, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

allocating resources to enhance resilience
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Allocating resources to enhance resilience Cameron MacKenzie, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Allocating resources to enhance resilience Cameron MacKenzie, Assistant Professor, Defense Resources Management Institute, Naval Postgraduate School Disaster resilience Disaster resilience is the ability to (Bruneau et al. 2003) Reduce


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Allocating resources to enhance resilience

Cameron MacKenzie, Assistant Professor,

Defense Resources Management Institute, Naval Postgraduate School

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Disaster resilience

  • Disaster resilience is the

ability to (Bruneau et al. 2003)

– Reduce the chances of a shock – Absorb a shock if it occurs – Recover quickly after it occurs

  • Nonlinear disaster recovery

(Zobel 2014)

Bruneau, M., Chang, S.E., Eguchi, R.T., Lee, G.C., O’Rourke, T.D., Reinhorn, A.M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W.A., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of

  • communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733-

752. Zobel, C.W. (2014). Quantitatively representing nonlinear disaster

  • recovery. To appear in Decision

Sciences.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Quantifying disaster resilience

𝑆∗ 𝛾, 𝑌, 𝑈 = 1 − 𝛾𝑌𝑈 𝑈∗

3

𝑌 𝑈 𝑈∗ 𝛾

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Research questions

  • 1. How should a decision maker allocate

resources among the three factors in order to maximize resilience?

  • 2. What are possible functions that determine

effectiveness of allocating resources?

  • 3. When is it optimal to allocate resources to

reduce all three factors?

  • 4. Does the optimal decision change when

there is uncertainty?

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Resource allocation model

5

maximize 𝑆∗ 𝛾 𝑨𝛾 , 𝑌 𝑨𝑌 , 𝑈 𝑨𝑈 subject to 𝑨𝛾 + 𝑨𝑌 + 𝑨𝑈 ≤ 𝑎 𝑨𝛾, 𝑨𝑌, 𝑨𝑈 ≥ 0 𝑆∗ 𝛾, 𝑌, 𝑈 = 1 − 𝛾𝑌𝑈 𝑈∗

Factor as a function of resource allocation decision Budget

minimize 𝛾 𝑨𝛾 ∗ 𝑌 𝑨𝑌 ∗ 𝑈 𝑨𝑈

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Allocation functions

  • 𝛾 𝑨𝛾 , 𝑌 𝑨𝑌 , and 𝑈 𝑨𝑈 describe ability to

allocate resources to reduce each factor of resilience

  • Requirements

– Factor should decrease as more resources are allocated:

𝑒𝛾 𝑒𝑨𝛾, 𝑒𝑌 𝑒𝑨𝑌, and 𝑒𝑈 𝑒𝑨𝑈 are less than 0

– Constant returns or marginal decreasing improvements as more resources are allocated:

𝑒2𝛾 𝑒𝑨𝛾

2,

𝑒2𝑌 𝑒𝑨𝑌

2, and

𝑒2𝑈 𝑒𝑨𝑈

2 are greater than or equal to 0

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Four allocation functions

  • 1. Linear
  • 2. Exponential
  • 3. Quadratic
  • 4. Logarithmic

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Linear allocation function

𝛾 𝑨𝛾 = 𝛾 − 𝑏𝛾𝑨𝛾 𝑌 𝑨𝑌 = 𝑌 − 𝑏𝑌𝑨𝑌 𝑈 𝑨𝑈 = 𝑈 − 𝑏𝑈𝑨𝑈

  • Assume 𝛾

≥ 𝑏𝛾𝑎, 𝑌 ≥ 𝑏𝑌𝑎, and 𝑈 ≥ 𝑏𝑈𝑎

  • Decision maker should only allocate resources to

reduce one of the three resilience factors based on max

𝑏𝛾 𝛾 , 𝑏𝑌 𝑌 , 𝑏𝑈 𝑈

  • Focuses resources on the factor whose initial

parameter is already small and where effectiveness is large

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Exponential allocation function 𝛾 𝑨𝛾 = 𝛾 exp −𝑏𝛾𝑨𝛾 𝑌 𝑨𝑌 = 𝑌 exp −𝑏𝑌𝑨𝑌 𝑈 𝑨𝑈 = 𝑈 exp −𝑏𝑈𝑨𝑈

  • Decision maker should only allocate resources

to reduce one of the three resilience factors based on max 𝑏𝛾, 𝑏𝑌, 𝑏𝑈

  • Decision depends only the effectiveness and

not the initial values

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Quadratic allocation function 𝛾 𝑨𝛾 = 𝛾 − 𝑐𝛾𝑨𝛾 + 𝑏𝛾𝑨𝛾

2

𝑌 𝑨𝑌 = 𝑌 − 𝑐𝑌𝑨𝑌 + 𝑏𝑌𝑨𝑌

2

𝑈 𝑨𝑈 = 𝑈 − 𝑐𝑈𝑨𝑈 + 𝑏𝑈𝑨𝑈

2

Assume 𝑨𝛾 ≤

𝑐𝛾 2𝑏𝛾, 𝑨𝑌 ≤ 𝑐𝑌 2𝑏𝑌, 𝑨𝑈 ≤ 𝑐𝑈 2𝑏𝑈 so that

functions are always decreasing

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Optimal to allocate to three factors

11

9.2 14.1 2.7

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Logarithmic allocation functions 𝛾 = 𝛾 − 𝑏𝛾 log 1 + 𝑐𝛾𝑨𝛾 𝑌 = 𝑌 − 𝑏𝑌 log 1 + 𝑐𝑌𝑨𝑌 𝑈 = 𝑈 − 𝑏𝑈 log 1 + 𝑐𝑈𝑨𝑈

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Optimal to allocate to three factors

13

8.5 13.4 4.0

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Simulation

  • 𝛾

~𝑉(0,1), 𝑌 ~𝑉(0,1), 𝑈 ~𝑉(0,30)

  • Effectiveness parameters: 𝑏𝛾, 𝑐𝛾, 𝑏𝑌, 𝑐𝑌, 𝑏𝑈, 𝑐𝑈

– Uniform distribution – Allocation functions are not negative – Other requirements are met

14

Quadratic allocation Logarithmic allocation Sufficient conditions met 0.4 51 Optimal to allocate to all 3 factors 1.3 91 Percent of simulations

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Uncertainty with independence

  • Assume 𝛾

, 𝑌 , 𝑈 , 𝑏𝛾, 𝑐𝛾, 𝑏𝑌, 𝑐𝑌, 𝑏𝑈, 𝑐𝑈 have known distributions

  • Assume independence
  • Maximize expected resilience 𝐹 𝑆∗ 𝛾, 𝑌, 𝑈

= 1 −

𝐹 𝛾 𝐹 𝑌 𝐹 𝑈 𝑈∗

  • Linear and quadratic allocation functions (same as

with certainty)

  • Logarithmic allocation function: more likely to

allocate to reduce all three factors than with certainty

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Exponential allocation, uncertainty Always a convex optimization problem

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Uncertainty with dependence

  • Assume dependence among uncertain

parameters

  • Linear: allocate to reduce one or all three

factors

  • Exponential

– Convex optimization problem – May allocate to reduce one, two, or three factors – Allocation may be influenced by 𝛾 , 𝑌 , and 𝑈

  • Quadratic and logarithmic: no special

properties

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Uncertainty without probabilities

  • Each parameter is bounded above and below,

i.e. 𝛾 ≤ 𝛾 ≤ 𝛾 and 𝑏𝛾 ≤ 𝑏𝛾 ≤ 𝑏𝛾

  • Maxi-min approach

maximize min 𝑆∗ 𝛾 𝑨𝛾 , 𝑌 𝑨𝑌 , 𝑈 𝑨𝑈

  • Same rules as the case with certainty but

choose worst-case parameters to determine allocation, i.e. 𝛾 and 𝑏𝛾

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary

19

Allocation function Certainty Uncertainty with independence Uncertainty with dependence Uncertainty with no probabilities Linear Reduce 1 factor Reduce 1 factor Reduce 1 or 3 factors Same as case with certainty but use worst-case parameters Exponential Reduce 1 factor Reduce 1, 2, or 3 factors Reduce 1, 2,

  • r 3 factors

Quadratic May reduce 3 factors but not likely May reduce 3 factors but not likely Logarithmic Often reduce 3 factors Often reduce 3 factors Email: camacken@nps.edu