aligning linguistic research incentives and open
play

Aligning Linguistic Research Incentives and Open Scholarship - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aligning Linguistic Research Incentives and Open Scholarship __________________________________________________________ Chris Bourg, MIT Director of Libraries Greg Tananbaum, Head of Open Research Funders Group Overview of NASEM's Roundtable


  1. Aligning Linguistic Research Incentives and Open Scholarship __________________________________________________________ Chris Bourg, MIT Director of Libraries Greg Tananbaum, Head of Open Research Funders Group

  2. Overview of NASEM's Roundtable on Aligning Incentives for Open Science

  3. NASEM Roundtable: Goals Research Values ● Transparency ● Replicability & Reproducibility Open Dialog ● Knowledge Sharing ● ● Follow-On Research Open Science Alignment Incentives Practices Hiring ● ● Open Access ● Tenure & Promotion Data Sharing ● ● Funding Preregistration ●

  4. NASEM Roundtable: Participants Universities Funders Agencies & Others Arizona State University Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Association of American Medical ● ● ● Atlanta University Center American Heart Association Colleges ● ● Benedict College Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Association of American ● ● ● Harvard University Arcadia Universities ● ● Howard University Arnold Ventures Association of Public and Land- ● ● ● Johns Hopkins University Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant Universities ● ● Massachusetts Institute of Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness European Commission ● ● ● Technology Innovations National Institute of Standards and ● Princeton University Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Technology ● ● Stanford University Health Research Alliance National Institutes of Health ● ● ● Trinity University Howard Hughes Medical Institute Open Research Funders Group ● ● ● University of Arizona James S. McDonnell Foundation National Science Foundation ● ● ● University of California John Templeton Foundation Scholarly Publishing and Academic ● ● ● University of California at Los Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Resources Coalition ● ● Angeles Charitable Trust U.S. Department of Education ● University of Houston Lumina Foundation United Kingdom Research and ● ● ● University of Southern California Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Innovation ● ● Schmidt Futures ● Wellcome Trust ●

  5. Roundtable Deliverables Actionable guidance and resources designed to assist university leadership, academic department chairs, research funders, and government agencies.

  6. Provost & Chairs Working Group

  7. P&C Group’s Origin Story

  8. P&C Relationship to Other Working Groups Reimagining Outputs What research types should a policy encompass? Provost & Chair Nudge Form How do we engage What language best admin and depts to signals support for understand what is open sharing, and appropriate for them? where to insert it?

  9. Conversations to Date 36 Departments 22 Institutions 14 Disciplines

  10. Collaborating with the LSA

  11. “How do we make sure that the open science policies we implement here will align with what our peers are doing in their own departments? ” - Really Smart Department Chair from Big-Time University

  12. “It would totally suck if we made our people do open stuff that made it harder for them to get work elsewhere. ” - Really Smart (If Perhaps Slightly More Blunt) Department Chair from Different Big-Time University

  13. The Psychology Example

  14. Sample Signalling Language: Faculty Annual Reporting ● For each of the categories below, please provide representative examples demonstrating how (where appropriate) you have made outputs resulting from your research openly accessible. If possible, please provide the DOI and license terms under which the materials are available. Open access articles ○ ○ Open access books, book chapters, and/or monographs ○ Copies of your papers, chapters, monographs, or other published materials in institutional or disciplinary repositories Etc. ○ ● If known, describe how others have made use of these open research outputs, and include relevant DOIs if possible. This can include use in other disciplines and outside of academia. Please describe the impact that your openly available research outputs from this evaluation period ● have had from the research, public policy, pedagogic, and/or societal perspectives.

  15. So What Do We 1. Build a “Linguistics Coalition of the Willing” Want? 1. Collaborate to Develop Linguistics-Appropriate Language and Insertion Points Coordinated action to 1. Collaborate to Develop Linguistics-Appropriate develop open science plans Propagation Plans that are appropriate for your 1. Commitments to Engage with Department Colleagues department, your institution, and Academic Leadership to Get Buy-In and your discipline . 1. Commitments to Share Lessons Learned from these Engagements

  16. ...and What Are We 1. Provide Toolkit of Resources to Adapt and Adopt Prepared to Do? 1. Leverage NASEM Imprimatur to Ensure Academic Leadership are Engaged Lead the effort to 1. Coordinate Linguistics Cohort Discussions understand what open 1. Analyze Collective Wisdom and Share with Broader science language, practices, Linguistics Community and policies can be realistically implemented at scale in linguistics .

  17. Let’s Talk! cbourg@mit.edu greg@orfg.org

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend