Agro-Food Systems and Agroecology Chapter 11 What we will cover - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Agro-Food Systems and Agroecology Chapter 11 What we will cover - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Agro-Food Systems and Agroecology Chapter 11 What we will cover Human-environment interactions Agro-food system evolution How the system is trying to provide for global demand How the system is affecting social and ecological
What we will cover
Human-environment interactions Agro-food system evolution How the system is trying to provide
for global demand
How the system is affecting social and
ecological interactions
Land use and land cover changes The growing changes from globalization
and food trade
Feedback loops The future of the agro-food system
Humans have had a 1/3
impact on the biosphere
Agriculture is only a small
percentage of Gross World Product
If you include all processing,
transportation and retail= 8 percent
NPP= net primary production
Growth of vegetation which
depends on location, soil quality, elevation, precipitation, temperature, as well as other factors
Rural populations are most
common at medium NPP areas- less completion but enough food
GDP per capita generally
tends to be positively correlated with NPP
Income tends to increase with distance
from the equator
Human distribution can be mapped using
4 parameters
Altitude, nearness to rivers and coasts,
temperature and precipitation
Anthromes a type of biome that reflects the
changes humans have made
80% of all people live in densely
populated urban and rural villages
1 in 4 people live in agricultural villages Social Ecological systems
An integrated human- environment
system with feedback and interdependence
Used to explore sustainable pathways
based on the identified local varieties and contingencies
Agro food systems
In an urban setting, the
natural environment is usually restricted to natural parks and rural areas.
Intensive agriculture in a
few highly productive areas
The rest of the world relies on
the natural world right around them for sustenance, survival, and enjoyment
Figure 11.4
This shows how agricultural
practices have evolved over time but also how each stage has gained a niche in the overall agricultural system
There are still a couple hundred
thousand hunter gathers that exists in remote areas of the world.
Because they are vulnerable to
external shocks they will diversify
A subset of the nomads are
commercial grazing operations.
Where land was scare- large,
intensified manufacturing plants process dense populations of animals for supermarket consumption.
Shifting cultivation is done by
around 500 million people but rising population density and food demand have pushed more of these farmers into permanent agriculture and cash crops
For intermediate, modern, and
mechanized farming there are two main categories:
Wet rice culture and mixed farming Wet-rice relies on lots of water (usually from
natural floods) and labor vs lots of soil and less labor or livestock.
However in many cases much of the rice
grown is consumed by the household and so it is technically considered subsistence farming
The modern methods of mixed farming
Started in the early middle ages
Reduction of the fallow period, Elimination of common rights, Greater need for livestock, Need for more intensive use of inputs Shift from cereals to high value crops.
Modern agriculture has become
dependent on science, manufacturing, and technology
Globalization has only increased these
factors and has forced farmers to comply with standards
Food needs and demands
The consumption need is determined by the
amount of people and their nutritional requirements.
The number of food units as well as amount of
income spent on food can track the food needs
Engel’s Law The proportion of staple foods consumed
decreases with rising income but the consumption of luxury foods increases with increasing income
Liebig's law- the weakest link
For the food system
A population is not limited by the total resources in
the system but rather by the availability of those resources during the time of highest scarcity
Another way to look at the
system is at biophysical resource potential- or how food can be supplied
Based on soils, temperature,
and precipitation- variable can be made to see the potential yields of crops in certain places.
Figure 11.5 shows the
potential yield of some crops but the potential doesn't equal actual and
The difference is called the
yield gap.
A different agro-economic
method is to define efficiency of crops as the difference between the actual yield and the growth defining variables
How the system supplies more food
Much of the increase in food production comes
from yield improvements and intensification
But will it take a increasingly large toll on the
environment?
In order to track this the inherent fertility of soils is
looked at
This is to preserve the ability of a soil to grow
plants as it was before humans interacted with it
To do this the nutrient flow and pollutants must
both be net neutral flows
Figure 11.7 shows the flows
The effects of over- intensification
land degradation in densely populated
areas
Water use is at unsustainable levels Chemical inputs are disrupting phosphorus
and nitrogen cycles leading to eutrophication
Methane and carbon dioxide emissions
from meat production mean climate changes
This can be beneficial for some but
generally causes severe consequences such as droughts or extreme rainfall
Cases
Nomads in Mongolia
Rural farmers were growing a lot of facai grass The mass harvesting of the grass quickly
desertified a great portion of the landscape that one was grassland.
This led to the farmers pushing rural herders off
their land by force and also created dust storms that affected surrounding areas
Rural France
Farms in France have decreased over the last 40 years and is
expected to decrease further in the future
The global competition for produce have pushed prices so low
that the costs outweigh the returns
Many farmers are being forced to look for other opportunities of
work in order to stay afloat
Those farms that remain have turned into mega-operations with
razor thin margins
In order to save the rural farmers many suggest to push trends
that:
Rely on food ideals centered on local quality and flavor,
agritourism, or allowing farmers to be the main managers of the landscape and surrounding nature
However, many say it is doubtful that these trends will arise and
with steep global competition, the question of whether to actually save rural France comes into question
Land use changes
Land change occurs in
low-income areas places that are rapidly urbanizing and
industrializing
Deforestation is one of the most common
examples and has been occurring around the world at different areas in different stages
Europe, Northern India, and China in the 18th
century,
North America and Russia in the 19th century, South America and south east Asia in the 20th
century
Africa for the 21st century
Land use/ land cover transitions
Are reversible change processes with many economic,
ecological, and social feedbacks
Different areas of the world are in different stages of land
use/cover transitions
There are many direct and indirect causes behind what
makes land use/cover transitions
5 fundamental underlying causes
Resource scarcity and a pressure on production of resources Changing opportunities by the markets Outside policy intervention Loss of adaptive capacity and increased vulnerability Changes in social organization in resource access and
attitudes
Most important is the behavioral responses to perceived
- pportunities and constraints of markets and policies
Many issues arise because top down government strategies
don’t take local biogeography into account
Modelling Land use/cover changes and
transitions
Usually done at a top down aggregate level for
land categories over time
But because these changes and transitions are
so complex down to a local level, it is necessary to have a bottom up approach
Unit of production= family farms
Microclimates, seasonal variations, soil erosion
Landscape= communities
Altitude, topography, soil and water basins
Region=social, economic, cultural, and
biophysical aspects of communities
Colonization, migration, major
infrastructure, world food prices, trade
- pportunities, climate parameters,
and crop potentials
CLUE (Conversion of Land Use and its
Effects)
Input the suitability and food availability Urban expansion, technology availability,
management level, and values
Translate demand into actual land use
changes
Food security and technological adaptation Explores how to achieve sustainable food for
all
Example of CLUE model at the local scale in the Philippines-
See Figure 11.9
The San Mariano municipality 48,500 hectares and 20 villages near a large protected area Logging deforested a big part of the area Logging Moratorium But even with the change, agricultural trends using CLUE have
shown to be at unsustainable levels and is still about one-third that of the previous rate
So in order to help design policies to stop the deforestation, the
model must show the forces action on the situation at different scales of local, regional, and global in an integrated way
Made a transition into a global
agro- food system
Intensified agriculture Efficient logistics High-value food with low prices A huge diversity in food options
One-third of the world still lives in
an economy dependent on subsistence farming and herding
Generally these people groups
have high pressure from globalization, low education, and have little access to capital
Rigid social hierarchies Mythical worldviews about the
food production and its value as a cultural and traditional resource as well as nutrition
These types of societies are called social
ecological systems (SES)
Regional biogeography plays a big role in the
human culture and institutions
Some activities are not monetized Local resources are utilized as common pool
resources with both competitive and cooperative arrangements
Social stratification is high and surplus generally
goes to the elites, local landlords, or government
People are vulnerable for natural and human
disturbances to the system
For SES systems sustainable development means
tackling the challenges associated with
- verpopulation and local resource
- verexploitation
Trade and outward migration can both help and
cause new issues
For the advanced industrial economies, their
agricultural products are only 3-4 % of the agri-population but make up two-thirds of the market value for outputs
There is nearly no connection to the natural
ecosystem the further industrialized and intensified the bulk of operations have become
Competition forces the need for higher yields of
high value crops as well as animal products
Concerns about the environment and
shrinking margins affect all the actors in the is area
In between the extremes
Many try to survive by combining
subsistence farming, cash cropping, and work in urban centers
Farmland especially in Africa is being
purchased for large cash crop plantations
Many people in this area simply want a
steady income opportunity to have basic amenities of modern life
The food trade has
evolved over time to reduce vulnerability
It started out as
conquest and colonization for novel products
But now has
evolved into food trade
Figure 11.10
Cereal production
has nearly tripled since 1960 and meat production has increased fourfold
Food production is the upstream
portion of the global food supply chain
Larger value added comes
downstream
80% of this value added is in processing
and retailing and 20% comes from manufacturing of seeds, agrochemicals, and biotech
Around a dozen large global companies
control about one-third of all global transactions for the 80% processing/retailing
Nestle and Walmart are the largest of these
About 10 large companies control about
90% of the seed, agrochem, and biotech market
Monsanto, Bayer, and Syngenta are part of
this
Globalization Both a blessing and a curse
Competition and large scale farms create food
price instabilities
Hunger and undernourishment still exists for about
- ne billion people but there may be enough
food production to serve 9 billion or more people
This is because many people cannot afford the food
- r have no reliable access to it
Food aid also plays a role in aggravating the
situations by making the people dependent on foreign aid to survive with no initiatives or investments to rectify the situations they are in
There is still room to grow on the supply side as
global demand grows but the argument of sustainability with increasing intensity and innovations may prove that the system may become more vulnerable over time
Godfray et. al. article
The authors argue that the
challenge that now faces the world is :
To match rapidly changing
demand to supply while being sustainable in both social and ecological ways as well as ensure that the poorest are no longer left hungry
They state that radical changes ae
needed to meet this challenge
Some of the solutions they propose
are:
To help close the yield gap by increasing secure land rights and having investments from large farming operations that take locals welfare into consideration
Increase production limits and
reducing wastes
Change diets by including less meat
but not completely removing it but switching some operations to better forms such as aquaculture
There are a few causal feedback
loops that affect the global agro- food system
Figure 11.11
Production loop Positive feedback loop- investment
to produce, return from the investment, reinvestment, and then increasing capacity to produce
Price Competition loop Competition drives down price
which increases demand until profit margins are so low, new markets are looked for.
Subsidiary loop is the marketing and
upgrading loop where demand is driven up by processing and advertising
Upscaling and Innovation loop Product cost declines as labor and
capital productivity increase
However these three loops block
market incentives to deal with prices and losses that contribute to hunger
Two more feedback loops
Import loop
Increased capacity to deliver pushes down prices and pushes
up demand
Regulation loop
Higher incomes increase demand for more stringent
environmental, health, safety, and animal welfare standards which then increases price
For the consumers, it is a virtuous cycle of more food at
decreasing prices
For the farmers, it is a vicious cycle of continuous income
erosion with increasing dependence
This style of agro-business provides possible dangers to
long-term environmental health
High food surpluses Food shortages due to natural disasters, protectionism, and
rapidly rising demand
Externalization of consequences
Environmental and social damage because of push for
production
Poor farmers pushed out by global competition
Environmental regulations
Trade disputes over regulations that are not met by some and
is enforced upon others- unfair playing field
Constraints of the global agro-food system
Humans need a minimum amount of food for
physical survival
The resource base is finite in its ability to supply and
adapt
There is a balancing act between expectations
and tendencies
The system has evolved with a free market
worldview
It should lead to improvements with manage side
effects
But in reality, exploitation of the system is rampant
The main questions of the future of the system are:
Will major disruptions always happen when food
prices become volatile?
Is technology the solution? Will overexploitation defeat yield improvements Can community based agriculture help food
security?
Do we need a new ethic to stop world hunger?
The trends for what
will happen in the future are already visible in today’s world
Table 11.3 tries to
show the different worldviews for different questions and attempts to show the arguments against the modernist worldview in four different ways
Summary
Food is essential The global agro-food system is diverse, complex, and
interconnected
Agro- food systems have evolved over time and are defined by
social-ecological systems
World food production has increased at a rapid rate but not
without side effects
Land use and Land cover changes are driven by opportunities
for the poor and conversion for infrastructure
A few causal feedback loops drive the global food system;
namely competition, regulations, innovation, and production
It is important to understand all of the worldviews, ideals, major
actors, and interdependencies of the agro-food system in order to look for a transition to a sustainable food system
Discussion Questions
Does the global food system need to focus
- n increasing production or does it need to
focus more on the equitable distribution of food to all people or both?
If the answer is increasing production, how
should that happen, taking into consideration sustainability (not just environmental issues)
If the answer is to focus on equitable
distribution, can this be done while the current system is in place, or does it need to change?
If both, how can we find the balance