Agro-Food Systems and Agroecology Chapter 11 What we will cover - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

agro food systems and agroecology
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Agro-Food Systems and Agroecology Chapter 11 What we will cover - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agro-Food Systems and Agroecology Chapter 11 What we will cover Human-environment interactions Agro-food system evolution How the system is trying to provide for global demand How the system is affecting social and ecological


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Agro-Food Systems and Agroecology

Chapter 11

slide-2
SLIDE 2

› What we will cover

› Human-environment interactions › Agro-food system evolution › How the system is trying to provide

for global demand

› How the system is affecting social and

ecological interactions

› Land use and land cover changes › The growing changes from globalization

and food trade

› Feedback loops › The future of the agro-food system

slide-3
SLIDE 3

› Humans have had a 1/3

impact on the biosphere

› Agriculture is only a small

percentage of Gross World Product

› If you include all processing,

transportation and retail= 8 percent

› NPP= net primary production

› Growth of vegetation which

depends on location, soil quality, elevation, precipitation, temperature, as well as other factors

› Rural populations are most

common at medium NPP areas- less completion but enough food

› GDP per capita generally

tends to be positively correlated with NPP

slide-4
SLIDE 4

› Income tends to increase with distance

from the equator

› Human distribution can be mapped using

4 parameters

› Altitude, nearness to rivers and coasts,

temperature and precipitation

› Anthromes › a type of biome that reflects the

changes humans have made

› 80% of all people live in densely

populated urban and rural villages

› 1 in 4 people live in agricultural villages › Social Ecological systems

› An integrated human- environment

system with feedback and interdependence

› Used to explore sustainable pathways

based on the identified local varieties and contingencies

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

› Agro food systems

› In an urban setting, the

natural environment is usually restricted to natural parks and rural areas.

› Intensive agriculture in a

few highly productive areas

› The rest of the world relies on

the natural world right around them for sustenance, survival, and enjoyment

› Figure 11.4

› This shows how agricultural

practices have evolved over time but also how each stage has gained a niche in the overall agricultural system

slide-7
SLIDE 7

› There are still a couple hundred

thousand hunter gathers that exists in remote areas of the world.

› Because they are vulnerable to

external shocks they will diversify

› A subset of the nomads are

commercial grazing operations.

› Where land was scare- large,

intensified manufacturing plants process dense populations of animals for supermarket consumption.

› Shifting cultivation is done by

around 500 million people but rising population density and food demand have pushed more of these farmers into permanent agriculture and cash crops

slide-8
SLIDE 8

› For intermediate, modern, and

mechanized farming there are two main categories:

› Wet rice culture and mixed farming › Wet-rice relies on lots of water (usually from

natural floods) and labor vs lots of soil and less labor or livestock.

› However in many cases much of the rice

grown is consumed by the household and so it is technically considered subsistence farming

slide-9
SLIDE 9

› The modern methods of mixed farming

› Started in the early middle ages

› Reduction of the fallow period, › Elimination of common rights, › Greater need for livestock, › Need for more intensive use of inputs › Shift from cereals to high value crops.

› Modern agriculture has become

dependent on science, manufacturing, and technology

› Globalization has only increased these

factors and has forced farmers to comply with standards

slide-10
SLIDE 10

› Food needs and demands

› The consumption need is determined by the

amount of people and their nutritional requirements.

› The number of food units as well as amount of

income spent on food can track the food needs

› Engel’s Law › The proportion of staple foods consumed

decreases with rising income but the consumption of luxury foods increases with increasing income

› Liebig's law- the weakest link

› For the food system

› A population is not limited by the total resources in

the system but rather by the availability of those resources during the time of highest scarcity

slide-11
SLIDE 11

› Another way to look at the

system is at biophysical resource potential- or how food can be supplied

› Based on soils, temperature,

and precipitation- variable can be made to see the potential yields of crops in certain places.

› Figure 11.5 shows the

potential yield of some crops but the potential doesn't equal actual and

› The difference is called the

yield gap.

› A different agro-economic

method is to define efficiency of crops as the difference between the actual yield and the growth defining variables

slide-12
SLIDE 12

› How the system supplies more food

› Much of the increase in food production comes

from yield improvements and intensification

› But will it take a increasingly large toll on the

environment?

› In order to track this the inherent fertility of soils is

looked at

› This is to preserve the ability of a soil to grow

plants as it was before humans interacted with it

› To do this the nutrient flow and pollutants must

both be net neutral flows

› Figure 11.7 shows the flows

slide-13
SLIDE 13

› The effects of over- intensification

› land degradation in densely populated

areas

› Water use is at unsustainable levels › Chemical inputs are disrupting phosphorus

and nitrogen cycles leading to eutrophication

› Methane and carbon dioxide emissions

from meat production mean climate changes

› This can be beneficial for some but

generally causes severe consequences such as droughts or extreme rainfall

slide-14
SLIDE 14

› Cases

› Nomads in Mongolia

› Rural farmers were growing a lot of facai grass › The mass harvesting of the grass quickly

desertified a great portion of the landscape that one was grassland.

› This led to the farmers pushing rural herders off

their land by force and also created dust storms that affected surrounding areas

slide-15
SLIDE 15

› Rural France

› Farms in France have decreased over the last 40 years and is

expected to decrease further in the future

› The global competition for produce have pushed prices so low

that the costs outweigh the returns

› Many farmers are being forced to look for other opportunities of

work in order to stay afloat

› Those farms that remain have turned into mega-operations with

razor thin margins

› In order to save the rural farmers many suggest to push trends

that:

› Rely on food ideals centered on local quality and flavor,

agritourism, or allowing farmers to be the main managers of the landscape and surrounding nature

› However, many say it is doubtful that these trends will arise and

with steep global competition, the question of whether to actually save rural France comes into question

slide-16
SLIDE 16

› Land use changes

› Land change occurs in

› low-income areas › places that are rapidly urbanizing and

industrializing

› Deforestation is one of the most common

examples and has been occurring around the world at different areas in different stages

› Europe, Northern India, and China in the 18th

century,

› North America and Russia in the 19th century, › South America and south east Asia in the 20th

century

› Africa for the 21st century

slide-17
SLIDE 17

› Land use/ land cover transitions

› Are reversible change processes with many economic,

ecological, and social feedbacks

› Different areas of the world are in different stages of land

use/cover transitions

› There are many direct and indirect causes behind what

makes land use/cover transitions

› 5 fundamental underlying causes

› Resource scarcity and a pressure on production of resources › Changing opportunities by the markets › Outside policy intervention › Loss of adaptive capacity and increased vulnerability › Changes in social organization in resource access and

attitudes

› Most important is the behavioral responses to perceived

  • pportunities and constraints of markets and policies

› Many issues arise because top down government strategies

don’t take local biogeography into account

slide-18
SLIDE 18

› Modelling Land use/cover changes and

transitions

› Usually done at a top down aggregate level for

land categories over time

› But because these changes and transitions are

so complex down to a local level, it is necessary to have a bottom up approach

› Unit of production= family farms

› Microclimates, seasonal variations, soil erosion

› Landscape= communities

› Altitude, topography, soil and water basins

› Region=social, economic, cultural, and

biophysical aspects of communities

› Colonization, migration, major

infrastructure, world food prices, trade

  • pportunities, climate parameters,

and crop potentials

slide-19
SLIDE 19

› CLUE (Conversion of Land Use and its

Effects)

› Input the suitability and food availability › Urban expansion, technology availability,

management level, and values

› Translate demand into actual land use

changes

› Food security and technological adaptation › Explores how to achieve sustainable food for

all

slide-20
SLIDE 20

› Example of CLUE model at the local scale in the Philippines-

See Figure 11.9

› The San Mariano municipality › 48,500 hectares and 20 villages near a large protected area › Logging deforested a big part of the area › Logging Moratorium › But even with the change, agricultural trends using CLUE have

shown to be at unsustainable levels and is still about one-third that of the previous rate

› So in order to help design policies to stop the deforestation, the

model must show the forces action on the situation at different scales of local, regional, and global in an integrated way

slide-21
SLIDE 21

› Made a transition into a global

agro- food system

› Intensified agriculture › Efficient logistics › High-value food with low prices › A huge diversity in food options

› One-third of the world still lives in

an economy dependent on subsistence farming and herding

› Generally these people groups

have high pressure from globalization, low education, and have little access to capital

› Rigid social hierarchies › Mythical worldviews about the

food production and its value as a cultural and traditional resource as well as nutrition

slide-22
SLIDE 22

› These types of societies are called social

ecological systems (SES)

› Regional biogeography plays a big role in the

human culture and institutions

› Some activities are not monetized › Local resources are utilized as common pool

resources with both competitive and cooperative arrangements

› Social stratification is high and surplus generally

goes to the elites, local landlords, or government

› People are vulnerable for natural and human

disturbances to the system

› For SES systems sustainable development means

tackling the challenges associated with

  • verpopulation and local resource
  • verexploitation

› Trade and outward migration can both help and

cause new issues

slide-23
SLIDE 23

› For the advanced industrial economies, their

agricultural products are only 3-4 % of the agri-population but make up two-thirds of the market value for outputs

› There is nearly no connection to the natural

ecosystem the further industrialized and intensified the bulk of operations have become

› Competition forces the need for higher yields of

high value crops as well as animal products

› Concerns about the environment and

shrinking margins affect all the actors in the is area

slide-24
SLIDE 24

› In between the extremes

› Many try to survive by combining

subsistence farming, cash cropping, and work in urban centers

› Farmland especially in Africa is being

purchased for large cash crop plantations

› Many people in this area simply want a

steady income opportunity to have basic amenities of modern life

slide-25
SLIDE 25

› The food trade has

evolved over time to reduce vulnerability

› It started out as

conquest and colonization for novel products

› But now has

evolved into food trade

› Figure 11.10

› Cereal production

has nearly tripled since 1960 and meat production has increased fourfold

slide-26
SLIDE 26

› Food production is the upstream

portion of the global food supply chain

› Larger value added comes

downstream

› 80% of this value added is in processing

and retailing and 20% comes from manufacturing of seeds, agrochemicals, and biotech

› Around a dozen large global companies

control about one-third of all global transactions for the 80% processing/retailing

› Nestle and Walmart are the largest of these

› About 10 large companies control about

90% of the seed, agrochem, and biotech market

› Monsanto, Bayer, and Syngenta are part of

this

slide-27
SLIDE 27

› Globalization › Both a blessing and a curse

› Competition and large scale farms create food

price instabilities

› Hunger and undernourishment still exists for about

  • ne billion people but there may be enough

food production to serve 9 billion or more people

› This is because many people cannot afford the food

  • r have no reliable access to it

› Food aid also plays a role in aggravating the

situations by making the people dependent on foreign aid to survive with no initiatives or investments to rectify the situations they are in

› There is still room to grow on the supply side as

global demand grows but the argument of sustainability with increasing intensity and innovations may prove that the system may become more vulnerable over time

slide-28
SLIDE 28

› Godfray et. al. article

› The authors argue that the

challenge that now faces the world is :

› To match rapidly changing

demand to supply while being sustainable in both social and ecological ways as well as ensure that the poorest are no longer left hungry

› They state that radical changes ae

needed to meet this challenge

› Some of the solutions they propose

are:

›

To help close the yield gap by increasing secure land rights and having investments from large farming operations that take locals welfare into consideration

› Increase production limits and

reducing wastes

› Change diets by including less meat

but not completely removing it but switching some operations to better forms such as aquaculture

slide-29
SLIDE 29

› There are a few causal feedback

loops that affect the global agro- food system

› Figure 11.11

› Production loop › Positive feedback loop- investment

to produce, return from the investment, reinvestment, and then increasing capacity to produce

› Price Competition loop › Competition drives down price

which increases demand until profit margins are so low, new markets are looked for.

› Subsidiary loop is the marketing and

upgrading loop where demand is driven up by processing and advertising

› Upscaling and Innovation loop › Product cost declines as labor and

capital productivity increase

› However these three loops block

market incentives to deal with prices and losses that contribute to hunger

slide-30
SLIDE 30

› Two more feedback loops

› Import loop

› Increased capacity to deliver pushes down prices and pushes

up demand

› Regulation loop

› Higher incomes increase demand for more stringent

environmental, health, safety, and animal welfare standards which then increases price

› For the consumers, it is a virtuous cycle of more food at

decreasing prices

› For the farmers, it is a vicious cycle of continuous income

erosion with increasing dependence

› This style of agro-business provides possible dangers to

long-term environmental health

› High food surpluses › Food shortages due to natural disasters, protectionism, and

rapidly rising demand

› Externalization of consequences

› Environmental and social damage because of push for

production

› Poor farmers pushed out by global competition

› Environmental regulations

› Trade disputes over regulations that are not met by some and

is enforced upon others- unfair playing field

slide-31
SLIDE 31

› Constraints of the global agro-food system

› Humans need a minimum amount of food for

physical survival

› The resource base is finite in its ability to supply and

adapt

› There is a balancing act between expectations

and tendencies

› The system has evolved with a free market

worldview

› It should lead to improvements with manage side

effects

› But in reality, exploitation of the system is rampant

› The main questions of the future of the system are:

› Will major disruptions always happen when food

prices become volatile?

› Is technology the solution? › Will overexploitation defeat yield improvements › Can community based agriculture help food

security?

› Do we need a new ethic to stop world hunger?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

› The trends for what

will happen in the future are already visible in today’s world

› Table 11.3 tries to

show the different worldviews for different questions and attempts to show the arguments against the modernist worldview in four different ways

slide-33
SLIDE 33

› Summary

› Food is essential › The global agro-food system is diverse, complex, and

interconnected

› Agro- food systems have evolved over time and are defined by

social-ecological systems

› World food production has increased at a rapid rate but not

without side effects

› Land use and Land cover changes are driven by opportunities

for the poor and conversion for infrastructure

› A few causal feedback loops drive the global food system;

namely competition, regulations, innovation, and production

› It is important to understand all of the worldviews, ideals, major

actors, and interdependencies of the agro-food system in order to look for a transition to a sustainable food system

slide-34
SLIDE 34

› Discussion Questions

› Does the global food system need to focus

  • n increasing production or does it need to

focus more on the equitable distribution of food to all people or both?

› If the answer is increasing production, how

should that happen, taking into consideration sustainability (not just environmental issues)

› If the answer is to focus on equitable

distribution, can this be done while the current system is in place, or does it need to change?

› If both, how can we find the balance

between increasing production and making sure everyone can have proper food security?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

› Which feedback loop(s) ( production,

competition, innovation, import, and regulation) is/are the best intervention points for improving the system?

› With increasing globalization, should rural

farmers be continuing to farm in hopes the system will favor local producers or should they turn to other livelihoods and leave farming to larger farms?

› Is globalization a force that is more good

than bad or more bad than good for the agro-food system as a whole?