agenda
play

Agenda Introduction & Workshop Pledge Key Terms Lets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6/24/20 Welcome to DEI 200! Promoting Institutional Transformation to Advance Inclusion in Engineering Education Presented By: Agenda Introduction & Workshop Pledge Key Terms Lets Practice: Case Study Analysis Introduction to


  1. 6/24/20 Welcome to DEI 200! Promoting Institutional Transformation to Advance Inclusion in Engineering Education Presented By: Agenda Introduction & Workshop Pledge Key Terms Let’s Practice: Case Study Analysis Introduction to Institutional Bias Framework for Erasing Institutional Bias Call to Action 1

  2. 6/24/20 Acknowledgements Meet the Facilitators! Thank you to the Professional Development Planning Committee for their contributions to this workshop session. ● Lisa Abrams ● Elizabeth (Liz) Litzler ● Rebecca Atadero ● Bruce Neville ● Lesley Berhan ● Tershia Pinder- ● Colleen Bronner Grover ● Jenna Carpenter ● Meagan Pollock ● Jeff Fergus ● Saeed Rokooei Kayla Maxey Linda Alisha Sarang- Brianna Benedict (she/her) Vanasupa Sieminski (she/her) ● Bryce Hughes ● Linda Vanasupa (they/them) (they/them) PhD Candidate PhD Candidate ● Jeremy Waisome Purdue University Purdue University Visiting Professor in Materials Associate Dean Engineering Professor of Engineering Olin College We would like to meet you! In this workshop, I will… Speak my truth Using the chat box to tell us: ● Your name ● Your pronouns (e.g. they/them/theirs, ze/zir/zirs, she/her/hers, Listen and respect others he/him/his, etc.) ● One concern you have about engaging in diversity, equity, and Move up or move back inclusion work ● One goal you have for the workshop Expect to experience some discomfort and lack of closure *Adapted from Courageous Conversations about Race (Singleton & Linton, 2006) and Erasing Institutional Bias: How to Create Systemic Change for Organizational Inclusion (Jana & Diaz Mejias, 2018) 2

  3. 6/24/20 Systems Thinking Framework to Promote Systemic Cultural Forces Sustain Institutional Biases Institutional Change Erasing Institutional Bias Framework (Jana & Diaz Mejias, 2018) • Identify and set a clear intention. 1 • Lead with data 2 • Diagnose accurately 3 • Deconstruct: Eliminate subjective processes 4 • Reconstruct with objectivity 5 • Build in accountability and ongoing Image adapted from Edward (1971) and Senge, Kleiner, measurement 6 Roberts, Ross, Roth, Smith, & Gunman (1999) Image adapted from Edward (1971) and Senge, Kleiner, Roberts, Ross, Roth, Smith, & Gunman (1999) Identify and set a clear intention To access case study • What is the opportunity for change? materials • What is our goal? or go to DEI 200 Review Case Workshop Deconstruct: Eliminate (https://bit.ly/3hYsyqH) subjective process • What organizational processes create the Case Study opportunity for change? • What is hindering change? Lead with Data • What data do we have? • What case can we make? Reconstruct with Objectivity Overview • How can we meet our intention? • What resources do we Diagnose need? Accurately • What is the current state? • Who are the stakeholders? Needs? Perspectives? • Whose voice or perspective is Accountability & Assessment missing? Why? • How do we know we met our goal? • What will continuous improvement look like? Erasing Institutional Bias Framework (Jana & Diaz Mejias, 2018) 3

  4. 6/24/20 Allendale College is a small college with a well-established engineering program. A new dean of undergraduate admissions for the school of engineering, Dr. Docker, is hired with a mandate to increase the diversity of the student body, which is largely white and middle-class. While there is widespread support of this diversity effort, it is clear that the mandate has a second requirement: the increase in diversity not come with a change in admissions requirements that have rigorous standards for testing and high school course prep in science and math. Dr. Docker conducts a thorough Let’s Practice overhaul of the admissions process and engages in national efforts to reduce barriers to college admissions for traditionally underrepresented groups. Diagnose Identify and set a Lead with data clear intention Accurately • What is the opportunity for • What data do we have? • What is the current state? change? • What else do we need to • Who are the stakeholders? • What is our goal? know? Needs? Perspectives? • What case can we make? • Whose voice or perspective is missing? Why Allendale College is a small college with a well-established engineering Breakout Discussion: Let’s meet Lisa... program. A new dean of undergraduate admissions for the school of engineering, Dr. Docker, is hired with a mandate to increase the diversity of the student body, which is largely white and middle-class. While there is widespread support of this diversity effort, it is clear that the mandate has a Speak my truth second requirement: the increase in diversity not come with a change in Listen to and respect others admissions requirements that have rigorous standards for testing and high experiences school course prep in science and math. Dr. Docker conducts a thorough Move up or move back overhaul of the admissions process and engages in national efforts to reduce barriers to college admissions for traditionally underrepresented groups. Expect to experience some discomfort and lack of closure Accountability & Deconstruct Reconstruct Assessment To access case study materials • What organizational • How can we meet our • How do we know we met our or go to DEI 200 Workshop processes create the intention? goal? (https://bit.ly/3hYsyqH) opportunity for change? • What resources do we • What will we sustain our • What is hindering change? need? efforts? 4

  5. 6/24/20 Breakout Room 1: Breakout Room 2: Lead with Data (Notes) Identify and Set a Clear Intention (Notes) Breakout Room 3: Breakout Room 4: Diagnose Accurately (Notes) Deconstruct to Eliminate Subjective Processes (Notes) 5

  6. 6/24/20 Breakout Room 6: Breakout Room 5: Build in Accountability and Ongoing Reconstruct with Objectivity (Notes) Measurement (Notes) Based on Lisa’s story, tell us how we can create CALL TO systemic change in our institution? Discussion Debrief: ACTION “You have to act as if it were possible to radically • What are our intentions? transform the world. And you • What data do we have or need? have to do it all the time.” - Angela Davis • What is the diagnosis? • What must be deconstructed to be successful? • How could we reconstruct the system for an improvement? • How can we sustain these To access case study changes? materials or go to DEI 200 Workshop (https://bit.ly/3hYsyqH) 6

  7. 6/24/20 Call to Action References 1.Examine the current state of DEI at your institution. DEI 200 Workshop Materials (https://bit.ly/3hYsyqH) 2.Commit to learning more. • Literature, podcasts, articles, research (resources provided) ● Singleton, G. E., & Linton, C. (2006). Courageous conversations about race: A field guide for achieving equity in • Share & discuss what you have learned with others schools. Corwin Press • When you see a gap in your understanding, dig in & ask ● Jana, T., & Diaz Mejias, A. (2018). Erasing institutional bias how to create systemic change for organizational inclusion . questions. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler. 3.Connect with others doing similar work. ● Edward, T. (1971). Hall, Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor. • Contribute to discussions and be open to change. ● Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R., Roth, G., Smith, B., & Guman, E. C. (1999). The dance of change: The 4.Reflect on the work you and others are doing. challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organizations. Performance Improvement , 38 (5), 55-58. • How do individual decisions contribute to systemic issues. • Contemplate how your work is reflected in your actions & practice. 5.Commit to continue to “do the work.” • It is important to remember that no single approach will eradicate all disparities. • This work often takes time and the active involvement of many Additional Resources Institutional Biases ● Deane, B. R., & Ferdman, B. M. (2013). Diversity at work : The practice of inclusion . San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ● Sturm, S. (2007). The architecture of inclusion: Interdisciplinary insights on pursuing institutional citizenship. ● Harvard Journal of Law and Gender , 30, 409-424 ● Strum, S., Eatman, T., Saltmarch, J., and Bush, A. (2011). Full participation: Building the architecture for diversity and community engagement in higher education. Imagining America, 17. Systemic Racism (bit.ly/ANTIRACISMRESOURCES) ● Kendi, I. X. (2019). How to Be an Antiracist. New York: Random House. ● DiAngelo, R. (2018). White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. ● Hill Collins, P. (2009). Black feminist thought : Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.]. ed., Routledge classics). ● Oluo, I. (2018). So you want to talk about race . New York: Seal Press. ● Tatum, B. D. (1997). Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? and other conversations about race . New York: Basic Books ● Racial Equity Tools: https://www.racialequitytools.org/fundamentals ● Twitter: #BlackinTheIvory 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend