Agenda Item: 5.1 Application Ref : PA/19/01301 Site : City Hotel, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

agenda item 5 1 application ref pa 19 01301 site city
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Agenda Item: 5.1 Application Ref : PA/19/01301 Site : City Hotel, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agenda Item: 5.1 Application Ref : PA/19/01301 Site : City Hotel, 12-20 Osborn Street, London, E1 6TE Proposal : Part 4, 5 and 6 storey rear extension plus partial basement and associated internal changes to the existing hotel to create an


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Agenda Item: 5.1 Application Ref: PA/19/01301 Site: City Hotel, 12-20 Osborn Street, London, E1 6TE Proposal: Part 4, 5 and 6 storey rear extension plus partial basement and associated internal changes to the existing hotel to create an additional 153 rooms, external alterations to the Osborn Street elevation, cycle parking facilities, disabled car parking, plant, demolition of rear buildings within car park and other associated works.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Site Boundary/Ownership

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aerial Photograph

slide-4
SLIDE 4

View 1 – Osborn Street

slide-5
SLIDE 5

View 2 – Old Montague Street

slide-6
SLIDE 6

View 3 – Old Montague Street

slide-7
SLIDE 7

View 4 – Car Park

slide-8
SLIDE 8

View 5 – Car Park

slide-9
SLIDE 9

View 6 – Rear Façade

slide-10
SLIDE 10

View 7 – Rear Façade

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Public Consultation

  • 220 planning notification letters sent to nearby properties on

04/07/2019.

  • Site notice displayed on Osborn Street on 15/07/2019
  • Press notice was advertised on 11/07/2019.
  • Following revisions to the application re-consultation was

undertaken for a 14 day period from 12/09/2019.

  • Representations received:

– 37 Letters of representation – 37 letters of objection – 1 petition (60 signatures) of objection

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Objections

The comments raised in objection to the proposal can be summarised as follows:

  • Negative impact on daylight and sunlight to neighbouring habitable rooms and amenity spaces.
  • The submitted daylight and sunlight assessment is inaccurate
  • Corridor lighting will impact residents at night time.
  • Overlooking from the proposed development.
  • Increased noise arising from additional hotel guests, deliveries and refuse collections.
  • Increased noise and air pollution arising from the proposed development
  • Impact arising from the proposed development on the health of neighbouring residents.
  • Negative impacts from construction including pollution from noise and dust. .
  • The loss of the existing car park will place stress on the highway/ There will be an increase in the

number of vehicles on the highway arising from guests staying at the hotel.

  • The proposed hotel will compromise the supply of new homes
  • Excessive density of the proposed development
  • Bulk and mass of the development including proposed rear wall having an overbearing presence

and creating an unacceptable sense of enclosure

  • Concerns that the proposed development will cause the spread of fire to adjacent buildings and

block fire escape routes of adjacent buildings.

  • The proposal will degrade local biodiversity.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Existing Building

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Land Use

The site is located within the Central Activities Zone (CAZ), City Fringe Activity Area and Brick Lane District Centre in which hotels are required to be concentrated.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proposed Building – Osborn Street

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Proposed Building – Osborn Street

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Proposed Building – Old Montague Street

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Proposed Building – Old Montague Street

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Proposed Building – Old Montague Street

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Proposed Building – Aerial Overview

6 storeys 5 storeys 4 storeys

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Impact on Amenity – Surrounding Residential Properties

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Daylight

Daylight tests:

  • Vertical Sky Component (VSC) – assesses daylight at

the centre of the window.

  • No Sky Line (NSL) – also known as daylight distribution;
  • assesses daylight at desk height within the room.
  • Average Daylight Factor (ADF) – tests daylight to

proposed rooms.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sunlight

Sunlight tests:

  • Annual Probable Sunlight Hours (APSH) – measures

amount of sunlight received annually at centre point of window.

  • Overshadowing (Two hour sun contour) – measures

amount of sunlight an amenity area will receive on the 21st March (Spring Equinox).

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Daylight

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Impacts on Daylight and Sunlight

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Impacts on Daylight and Sunlight

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Impacts on Daylight and Sunlight

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Impacts on Daylight and Sunlight

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Impacts on Daylight and Sunlight

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Overshadowing – Green Dragon Yard Courtyards

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Overshadowing – Green Dragon Yard Private Amenity Spaces (Existing)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Overshadowing – Green Dragon Yard Private Amenity Spaces (Proposed)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Impact on Outlook, Privacy and Sense of Enclosure – Green Dragon Yard

EXISTING EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Impact on Outlook, Privacy and Sense of Enclosure – 22-30 Osborn Street

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Impact on Outlook, Privacy and Sense of Enclosure – 32-38 Osborn Street

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Transport and Servicing

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Planning Obligations

Financial Obligations:

  • £24,800.00 towards construction phase employment skills training
  • £55,284.00 towards end-user phase employment skills training
  • Mayoral CIL – approximately £802,480.00
  • LBTH CIL – approximately £1,338,499.46

Non-financial obligations include:

  • 20% local procurement
  • 20% local labour in construction
  • 6 construction phase apprenticeships
  • 1 end-user phase apprenticeship
  • Car free development (commercial)
  • Approval and implementation of Travel Plan
  • No coach bookings
  • Carbon Offset obligation in the event the scheme cannot deliver a 45% reduction
  • Compliance with Considerate Constructors Scheme
  • 90 Day Lets
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Officer’s Recommendation

  • Officer’s recommendation is to GRANT planning

permission subject to the prior completion of conditions.