advancing equity
play

Advancing Equity Better Bike Share June 24, 2016 Glenn Harris, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Advancing Equity Better Bike Share June 24, 2016 Glenn Harris, Center for Social Inclusion President Julie Nelson, Center for Social Inclusion Senior Vice- President and Government Alliance on Race and Equity Director Government Alliance on


  1. Advancing Equity Better Bike Share June 24, 2016 Glenn Harris, Center for Social Inclusion President Julie Nelson, Center for Social Inclusion Senior Vice- President and Government Alliance on Race and Equity Director

  2. Government Alliance on Race and Equity A national network of government working to achieve racial equity and advance opportunities for all. Supporting jurisdictions at the forefront ü Expanding jurisdictions – in 30 states and more than 100 cities – ü all levels of government Providing tools and resources to put theory into action ü Field Building Center for Social Inclusion The Center for Social Inclusion’s mission is Policy Communication Development to catalyze grassroots community, government, and other institutions to dismantle structural racial inequity. Organizational Change

  3. Government Alliance for Race and Equity Washington Minnesota Iowa Wisconsin Seattle Metropolitan Council Dubuque Dane County Tacoma Minneapolis Iowa City Madison Minneapolis Park Board St. Paul Oregon Michigan Portland Ottawa County Multnomah County Massachusetts Boston California Alameda County Virginia Fairfax County = Active GARE Members = Current GARE Engagements = Racial Equity Here Participants

  4. Objectives for today: • Gain understanding of basic equity terminology • Develop skills at operationalizing and organizing for equity • Gain skills communicating about race • Strategize about advancing equity with your peers

  5. Values and realities All men are created equal • With liberty and justice for all • Government of the people, by the • people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth

  6. History of government and race Government for Initially explicit Became implicit racial equity Government Discrimination Proactive policies, explicitly creates illegal, but “race- practices and and maintains racial neutral” policies procedures that inequity. and practices advance racial perpetuate inequity. equity.

  7. Why we lead with race Racial inequities deep and pervasive • Racial anxiety on the rise – race is • often an elephant in the room Learning an institutional and • structural approach can be used with other areas of marginalization Specificity matters •

  8. Current context:

  9. National best practice Normalize • A shared analysis and definitions • Urgency / prioritize Visualize Operationalize Organize • Racial equity tools • Internal infrastructure • Data to develop strategies and drive • Partnerships results

  10. Laying it on the Line 1. Hiring and promotion decisions should be based solely on merit. 2. Outreach is the most important strategy to improve equity in bike share programs. 3. I believe we can end racial inequity.

  11. Normalizing

  12. Equity? Equality? What’s the difference?

  13. Racial inequity in the U.S. ����������������������������� � ����������������������� From infant ������� ��������� ���� mortality to life expectancy, race predicts how well ���������������� ���������������� you will do… ����������� ������ ��������������������� �������������������

  14. Racial equity means: “ Closing the gaps ” so that race does not • predict one’s success, while also improving outcomes for all To do so, have to: • ü Target strategies to focus improvements for those worse off ü Move beyond “ services ” and focus on changing policies, institutions and structures

  15. How We Think Humans need meaning. ü Individual meaning ü Collective meaning Only 2% of emotional cognition is available consciously We unconsciously think about race even Racial bias tends to reside in the when we do not unconscious network explicitly discuss it.

  16. The Unconscious Mind Schemas : the “frames” through which our brains help us understand and navigate the world: 1. Sort into categories 2. Create associations 3. Fill in the gaps

  17. Schemas Help us organize information into broader categories. They largely reside in the sub-conscious. ü Objects ü Human beings (e.g., “the elderly”) 17 Schemas and the unconscious are social. They exist in and are shaped by our environment.

  18. What color are the following lines of text? Blue Red Green Black Green Red Blue Black Black Green Blue Red Green Green Black Blue (The Stroop Test)

  19. Explicit bias Implicit bias Expressed directly Expressed indirectly Aware of bias / operates Unaware of bias / operates consciously sub-consciously Example – a property Example – Sign in the manager doing more window of an apartment criminal background checks building – “we don’t rent to on African Americans than _____” whites.

  20. Examples of implicit bias When conductors were placed behind a screen, the percentage of female new hires for orchestral jobs increased 25% – 46%.

  21. Examples of implicit bias Job search Susan ü Identical resumes, apart from Smith names. ü White-sounding names – 50% more callbacks than African- American sounding names. LaKesha Washington

  22. What to do with bias? ü Suppressing or denying biased thoughts can actually increase prejudice rather than eradicate it. ü Openly acknowledging and challenging biases allows us to develop strategic interventions.

  23. What creates different outcomes?

  24. Institutional Institutional Explicit Implicit Individual Individual Explicit Implicit

  25. Institutional / Explicit Institutional / Implicit Policies which explicitly discriminate Individual / Explicit Policies that against a group. negatively impact one Individual / Implicit Prejudice in action – group unintentionally. Example: discrimination. Unconscious attitudes Police department Example: and beliefs. refusing to hire Example: Police department people of color. Police officer calling focusing on street- Example: someone an ethnic level drug arrests. Police officer calling slur while arresting for back-up more them. often when stopping a person of color.

  26. Individual racism: • Pre-judgment, bias, or discrimination by an individual based on race. Institutional racism: • Policies, practices and procedures that work better for white people individual than for people of color, often unintentionally or inadvertently. Structural racism: institutional • A history and current reality of institutional racism across all structural institutions, combining to create a system that negatively impacts communities of color.

  27. Operationalizing

  28. What is a Racial Equity Tool? Process Product Actively inserts racial equity into decision making processes

  29. Race in governmental policies Federal Housing Location of city facilities Streetlighting Administration

  30. What is a Racial Equity Tool process? • Desired results 1 • Analysis of data 2 • Community engagement 3 • Strategies for racial equity 4 • Implementation plan 5 • Communications and accountability 6

  31. Case Study: Minneapolis - Bossen Field Project overview • City-wide athletic complex and neighborhood park • Demographics and usage • Timeline and funding 31

  32. Community engagement How was community engaged? ü Surveys – online and paper ü Door knocking ü Intercept events ü Focus groups ü Public meetings ü Language translation / interpretation ü Partnering with community Common themes identified? Who benefits from proposed plan? Addressing potential negative impacts on communities of color 32

  33. Community engagement Athletics users Concept B was strongly preferred. Thought on location was “where it impacted people less.” Local neighbors Concept C was strongly preferred. Location of open field space close to residents was key. Ease of access, visibility, safety. 33

  34. Solution – new design • Picnic shelters/picnic area • Extended walkways- corridors for connection • Additional parking for athletic users • Open field space - proximity to apartment buildings • Location of pinwheel further from dense housing • Two basketball courts 34

  35. How did equity inform the project? Project scope and charge ü Balance neighborhood and citywide needs Additional preplanning ü Racial equity consultation- training for project staff ü Implementation of racial equity toolkit ü Development of targeted engagement tools to reach different user groups Outreach and engagement ü Authentic engagement and relationship building ü Analysis of qualitative and quantitative feedback Process ü Racial Equity lens at important decision points ü Weighing desires of different user groups and finding solutions that benefit all park users Holding ourselves accountable ü Evaluating impacts over time ü Incorporating lessons learned into future projects 35

  36. Who should use a Racial Equity Tool? Elected officials Government staff Community

  37. Racial Equity Action Plans: Dane County

  38. Racial Equity Action Plans: Portland

  39. Organizing

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend