Admissibility and asymptotic-preserving scheme
F . Blachère1, R. Turpault2
1Laboratoire de Mathématiques Jean Leray (LMJL),
Université de Nantes,
2Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux (IMB),
Bordeaux-INP
Admissibility and asymptotic-preserving scheme . Blachre 1 , R. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Admissibility and asymptotic-preserving scheme . Blachre 1 , R. Turpault 2 F 1 Laboratoire de Mathmatiques Jean Leray (LMJL), Universit de Nantes, 2 Institut de Mathmatiques de Bordeaux (IMB), Bordeaux-INP GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015,
1Laboratoire de Mathématiques Jean Leray (LMJL),
Université de Nantes,
2Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux (IMB),
Bordeaux-INP
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 2/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 3/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 4/28
hη hu
hη hv
hη
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 5/28
hη huhu
hη huhv
hη hu
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 6/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 7/28
xi−1 xi xi+1 xi−1/2 xi+1/2
i
i
i )(R(Wn i ) − Wn i )
i
i
i+1 − ρn i ) − bi−1/2∆x(ρn i − ρn i−1)
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 8/28
1 control of numerical diffusion:
2 ideas of hydrostatic reconstruction used in ‘well-balanced’ scheme used
3 using convergence speed and finite differences:
4 generalization of Gosse and Toscani:
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 9/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 10/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
nK,i1
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 11/28
K∈M
i∈EK
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 12/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 13/28
K,i(w)(wJ − wK)
K,i(w) ≥ 0
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 14/28
xK xL xB xA MK,i ML,i
nK,i i nL,i
K,i XJ
L,i XJ
K,i wJ
L,i wJ
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 15/28
wMK,i −wK |KMK,i|
wML,i −wL |LML,i|
K,i(w)(wJ − wK), with : νJ K,i(w) ≥ 0
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 16/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 17/28
K
K − ∆t
1
K ≡ W then F i · nK,i = F(W) · nK,i, 2
K,i ≥ 0, Fi · nK,i =
K,iFKJ · ηKJ
K,i · ηKJ = 0.
K∈M
J∈EK
J
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 18/28
1 TP flux:
2 HLL-DLP flux:
K,i
1 Fully respect the theorem, but not consistent in the diffusion limit 2 Does not respect the second property of admissibility, but consistent in
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 19/28
1
2 Physical Admissiblility Detection (PAD): if ˜
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 20/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 21/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
K
K − ∆t
K,iFKJ · ηKJ
K) · ηKJ
K) − Wn K),
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 22/28
γ+γ
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 23/28
K
K +
K,i
KJ
K,i)δh KJ
K
K +
K,i
J/2 − gh2 K/2).
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 24/28
K
K − ∆t
K − ∆t
J
K∈M
J∈EK
J
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 25/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 26/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 27/28
1
2
3
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 1/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 28/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 29/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 30/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 31/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 32/28
GdR EGRIN, 04/06/2015, Piriac-sur-Mer 33/28