SLIDE 17 17
Adjusting Fore casting Me thods To the Ne e ds Of The Te le communicat ion S e ctor
Monopoly situation Competitive Market Transition
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 j a n v
6 a v r
6 j u i l
6
t
6 j a n v
7 a v r
7 j u i l
7
t
7 j a n v
8 a v r
8 j u i l
8
t
8 j a n v
9 a v r
9 j u i l
9
t
9
Traf_D Forecast_D
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 j a n v
6 m a i
6 s e p t
6 j a n v
7 m a i
7 s e p t
7 j a n v
8 m a i
8 s e p t
8 j a n v
9 m a i
9 s e p t
9 j a n v
a i
e p t
Forecast_D
Univariate B&J Univariate B&J with Multivariate B&J Intervention Function Transfer Function Hubbing & Refiling Prices, Competition, LCR
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 j a n v
6 a v r
6 j u i l
6
t
6 j a n v
7 a v r
7 j u i l
7
t
7 j a n v
8 a v r
8 j u i l
8
t
8 j a n v
9 a v r
9 j u i l
9
t
9
Traf_D Forecast_D
Adapting the Forecasting Model to the new context
- Jan 1998 : Deregulation of
Telecom Market
- Traffic Forecast for 1998
accurate.
Univariate B&J for 1998
- Until early 1998 : Telecom
environment was stable.
- In 1998 : Some New players
entered the market
- 1999 : Deregulation of Telecom
Market has produced its early effects
- Traffic Forecast for 1999 accurate.
- Forecasting Model = Univariate B&J
with Intervention Function for 1999
environment was instable because full competition
- In 1999 : Increase of the number of
New players in the market
- 2000 : Deregulation of Telecom
Market has produced its full effects
- Traffic Forecast for 2000
accurate et MAPE has shown a stable error.
- Forecasting Model = Multivariate
B&J for 2000
- The new model feets well the
changing trend of traffic
- In 2000 : Telecom market was
fully competitive
- In 2000 : Increase of the number
- f New players in the market