Hear aring ing Utiliti ties es Rate Advisor sory y Commission - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hear aring ing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hear aring ing Utiliti ties es Rate Advisor sory y Commission - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Water ter and Waste tewater r Uti tilit ity y Service ce Rate te Adjus ustm tmen ents ts Public ic Hear aring ing Utiliti ties es Rate Advisor sory y Commission ommission Januar uary 27, 2016 Presentation Overview


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Water ter and Waste tewater r Uti tilit ity y Service ce Rate te Adjus ustm tmen ents ts Public ic Hear aring ing

Utiliti ties es Rate Advisor sory y Commission

  • mmission

Januar uary 27, 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Overview

  • Utilities Introduction
  • Water and Wastewater Systems Overview
  • Finance Plan
  • Rate Comparisons
  • Community Engagement Summary
  • Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Utilities at Work in Your Community

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Maintaining Your Utilities for Future Generations

slide-5
SLIDE 5

WATER R SYSTEM OVERVI VIEW EW

slide-6
SLIDE 6

It’s the right thing to do to fast-track our metering program and complete it by 2020. It’s great for water conservation and ensures everyone is billed in a fair and equitable way.

The Water System

  • 136,000 City water service

accounts

  • 2 water treatment plants
  • 29 groundwater wells
  • 11 reservoirs
  • 1,727 miles of pipeline
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Aging Water System

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Maintenance and Replacement Saves $$ Over Time

Water Pipelines

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Our Water Promise: Delivered

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Moving to a Fully Metered City

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Water System Improvement Costs: Next 4 Years

slide-12
SLIDE 12

WASTEWATER ER SYSTEM OVERVIE VIEW

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Wastewater System

  • Combined Sewer

System

  • Separated Sewer

System

  • 35 pumped basins
  • 6 gravity fed basins
  • About 40% of the city

served by SASD

  • DOU serves 76,657

customers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Aging Wastewater System

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Maintenance and Replacement Saves $$ Over Time

Wastewater Pipelines

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Our Wastewater Promise: Delivered

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Wastewater System Improvement Costs: Next 4 Years

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FI FINANC NCE E PLAN

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Proposed Water Rate Adjustment

Effect ectiv ive e Date of Proposed sed Increa ease se Current ent Rate July 1, 1, 2016 July 1, 1, 2017 July 1, 1, 2018 18 July 1, 1, 2019 Percen ent t Increa ease se 10% 10% 10% 10% Monthly thly Incr crea ease se $4.57 $5.03 $5.53 $6.09 Tot

  • tal

al Water Charge ge $45.73 $50.30 $55.33 $60.86 $66.95

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Proposed Wastewater Rate Adjustment

Effect ectiv ive e Date of Proposed sed Increa ease se Current ent Rate July 1, 1, 2016 July 1, 1, 2017 July 1, 1, 2018 18 July 1, 1, 2019 Percen ent t Increa ease se 9% 9% 9% 9% Monthly thly Incr crea ease se $2.02 $2.20 $2.40 $2.61 Tot

  • tal

al Wastewat ater er Charge ge $22.42 $24.44 $26.64 $29.04 $31. 1.65 65

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Storm Drainage The City has decided to postpone the proposed storm drainage service rate changes for approximately one year

  • Avoids potential conflicts with forthcoming

ballot initiatives

  • Provides the opportunity to further inform

customers about the storm drainage system condition, challenges and budget realities

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Finance Strategy

  • Work closely with City Treasurer’s Office
  • Mix of cash and debt financing mechanisms for capital

funding

  • Maximizes use of existing resources to the fullest extent

in order to mitigate rate increases

  • Four-Year Funding Plan
  • Meets regulatory requirements and addresses needs of

critical assets

  • Positions the enterprise funds to issue debt and reduce

risk to the general fund

  • Self-contained
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Cost Driver Projections

Cost st Driver FY17 FY18 18 FY19 FY20 Not

  • te

Labor

  • r

4% 4% 4% 4% 3%/yr + 1%/yr additional PERS costs; Low growth a factor of a workforce mostly at the top of the salary range; includes approved step + COLA Utilit ities es 4% 4% 4% 4% Based on historical trends Fuel 5% 5% 5% 5% Based on historical trends Chemi mical cals 3% 3% 3% 3% Based on historical trends CPI CPI 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% Based on historical trends CCI CI 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% Based on historical trends Genera eral Fund Tax 11% 11% 11% 11% Mandated transfer to City General Fund

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Expenses by Category

WATER WASTEWATER

Expenses by Category

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Program Benefits

  • Continued high quality, reliable services
  • Continued regulatory compliance
  • Local control
  • Environmental stewardship
  • Return on Investment: Economic development and

job creation

  • Produce $128 million of economic output
  • Create 829 new full-time equivalent jobs
  • Financial stability
  • Sustainability
slide-26
SLIDE 26

What Happens if We Don’t Act?

  • Public health/safety threats
  • Regulatory non-compliance
  • Federal/state enforcement
  • Loss of local control
  • Fines, moratoriums, consent decrees
  • Lawsuits and risk claims
  • Negative impact on economic development
  • bjectives
  • Financial instability
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Utility Rate Assistance Program

  • More than 1,600 customers actively participating
  • Over $490,000 spent to date
  • Bill Stuffer – March 2016
  • Leveraging SMUD’s customer database for outreach
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Proposition 218 Protest Summary Propose posed d Util ilit ity y Ser ervic ice e Rate e Adj djustmen tments ts Protest est Summa mary y as of

  • f January

y 27, 7, 2016 Total Notices ices Mail iled ed 18 181,8 ,849 49

  • No Specific Comment

161 <1%

  • Increase is Excessive or Unjustified

73 <1%

  • Causes a Financial Hardship

79

<1%

  • Quality/Level of Service Does Not Warrant Increase

28 <1% Tota

  • tal Writt

tten n Prot

  • tests

ts Received 341 <1% <1%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

RATE COMPAR ARISONS SONS

slide-30
SLIDE 30

How Sacramento Compares: Regionally

$0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00

Folsom Sacramento County Elk Grove Sacramento (Current) Woodland Roseville West Sacramento Sacramento (FY16/17 Proposed) Stockton Davis Sacramento Suburban

$34.44 $37.48 $37.48 $42.33 $44.00 $44.64 $45.18 $46.57 $59.30 $66.04 $78.45

City of Sacramento Current and Proposed FY16/17 Water Rate Comparison

slide-31
SLIDE 31

How Sacramento Compares: Regionally

$0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00

$34.70 $41.40 $46.54 $54.26 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 $9.60 $16.15 $19.85 $19.85 $22.42 $24.44

City of Sacramento Current and FY2016/17 Proposed Wastewater Rate Comparison

Collection SRCSD Treatment Treatment and Collection

2016 rates used where possible * Recommended rate for FY16/17, including SRCSD treatment rate increase for FY16/17 Note: Parts of the City of Sacramento are served by SASD

slide-32
SLIDE 32

How Sacramento Compares: West Coast Cities

$- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400

Wastewater Water

Assumes 15,000 gallons (or 2,000 cubic feet) monthly usage and a 3/4” (or nearest equivalent) meter size. Actual average usage for a 3/4” residential customer will vary by utility. Rates effective April 2, 2013. Data is from the 2012/13 Black & Veatch 50 Largest Cities Water/Wastewater Rate Survey.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

COMMUNI UNITY Y ENGAGEM GEMENT ENT PR PROGR GRAM AM

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Your Utilities. Your Community.

  • 24 presentations to Neighborhood Associations

and Business Community Leaders

  • New website serves as a central information hub:

YourUti rUtilit itie iesY sYourCommun

  • urCommunit

ity.com .com

  • Multicultural outreach program to Spanish,

Russian and Hmong communities

  • Mailed more than 180,000 Rate Change

Notifications to property owners and bill paying tenants

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Next Steps

  • Community Engagement Activities – Ongoing
  • Final Rate Recommendations to City Council – March,

2016

  • If approved, rates effective beginning July 1, 2016
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Qu Questions? estions?

Learn more: YourUtilitiesYourCommunity.com