Adherence, Hypertension, Claims data, EventFlow & CoCo Margrt - - PDF document

adherence hypertension claims data eventflow coco
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Adherence, Hypertension, Claims data, EventFlow & CoCo Margrt - - PDF document

6/2/2016 Adherence, Hypertension, Claims data, EventFlow & CoCo Margrt Vilborg Bjarnadttir Robert H. Smith School of Business | University of Maryland With Sana Malik & Catherine Plaisant & Eberechukwu Onukwugha Adherence


slide-1
SLIDE 1

6/2/2016 1

Adherence, Hypertension, Claims data, EventFlow & CoCo

Margrét Vilborg Bjarnadóttir Robert H. Smith School of Business | University of Maryland

With Sana Malik & Catherine Plaisant & Eberechukwu Onukwugha

Adherence

  • Morbidity
  • Mortality
  • Costs

– $13.35 billion in hospitalization costs annually due to medication non-adherence (Sullivan et al 1990)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

6/2/2016 2

  • The medication possession ratio (MPR):

period n

  • bservatio
  • f

length supplied days

time Study start Study end

= 83%

Adherence Measurement

  • 900,000 Individuals
  • 16 million prescription claims
  • 5 Drug classes:

– Angiotension-Converting Enzyme-Inhibitors (ACE) – Angiotension II Receptor Blockers (ARB) – Calcium Channel Blockers (CCB) – Beta blockers (Beta) – Diuretics

The Data

Michael A. Kane, Margrét V. Bjarnadóttir, Sanjay Ghimire. 2012. “Study of compliance in hypertension treatment” American Society of Hypertension, Annual Scientific Meeting. Poster Presentation, New York, NY, May 2012.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

6/2/2016 3

  • Can we use visualization to understand

adherence patterns

– Can we derive new metrics/visualizations/knowledge – Can we make better prescription decisions

The Research Questions

time

Hypertension Treatment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

6/2/2016 4

time

Hypertension Treatment

time

Hypertension Treatment

slide-5
SLIDE 5

6/2/2016 5

  • Can we use visualization to understand

adherence patterns

– Can we derive new metrics/visualizations/knowledge – Can we make better prescription decisions

  • What are the effects of our modeling

decisions

  • Can we understand different subgroups better

The Research Questions

time

Hypertension Treatment

time

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6/2/2016 6

Gaps & Overlaps Gaps & Overlaps

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6/2/2016 7

PATTERNS AND MODELING DECISIONS

Case study

Event Flow

slide-8
SLIDE 8

6/2/2016 8

General Patterns Modeling Decisions* Diuretics Only - Gaps

slide-9
SLIDE 9

6/2/2016 9

Diuretics Only - Gaps Drilling Down with CoCo

  • Adherent vs. non-adherent
  • Ace-Inhibitors vs Diuretics
slide-10
SLIDE 10

6/2/2016 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

6/2/2016 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

6/2/2016 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

6/2/2016 13

Summary

  • All of the standard data cleaning

considerations apply and are necessary

  • CoCo can quickly compare two cohorts and

give an overall feel the differences between the two groups

margret@rhsmith.umd.edu