Addressing the Issue of Addressing the Issue of Shipping Related - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

APEC Marine Debris Workshop APEC Marine Debris Workshop Honolulu January 2004 Honolulu January 2004

Addressing the Issue of Addressing the Issue of Shipping Related Waste Shipping Related Waste (Marine Debris) in the Pacific (Marine Debris) in the Pacific Islands Region Islands Region

Sefa Nawadra Sefa Nawadra Marine Pollution Adviser Marine Pollution Adviser PACPOL / SPREP PACPOL / SPREP

Introduction to SPREP

• Regional Inter-government

environmental agency

• 14 PICs, 7 PITs, Aust., France, NZ, USA
• Function - coordination & advisory
• PACPOL 5 year SPREP/IMO Program to

address shipping related issues

• Implementation 2000 - 2004
• Funding from Canada and IMO
• 5 Focal areas - marine spills, ships

waste management, port operations, IMS and WWII Wrecks

Situation in PICs

• Small size and economy.
• Solid waste management inadequate
• Urban Landfills/dumps near coast
• Dumping in rivers or at sea
• Waste management in rural areas
• Needed to characterise our maritime

sector

• No Marine Pollution legislation in most

PICs

• Limited capacity to Implement / enforce

Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε

Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Ε Apra Apra Apra Apra Apra Apra Apra Apra Apra Honolulu Honolulu Honolulu Honolulu Honolulu Honolulu Honolulu Honolulu Honolulu Long Be Long Be Long Be Long Be Long Be Long Be Long Be Long Be Long Be Los Ang Los Ang Los Ang Los Ang Los Ang Los Ang Los Ang Los Ang Los Ang Manila Manila Manila Manila Manila Manila Manila Manila Manila Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Pago Port Moresby Port Moresby Port Moresby Port Moresby Port Moresby Port Moresby Port Moresby Port Moresby Port Moresby Pusan Pusan Pusan Pusan Pusan Pusan Pusan Pusan Pusan San Die San Die San Die San Die San Die San Di San Di San Di San Die San Francis San Francis San Francis San Francis San Francis San Franci San Franci San Franci San Francis Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Shanghai Taichung Taichung Taichung Taichung Taichung Taichung Taichung Taichung Taichung Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo Yokohama Yokohama Yokohama Yokohama Yokohama Yokohama Yokohama Yokohama Yokohama Brisbane Brisbane Brisbane Brisbane Brisbane Brisbane Brisbane Brisbane Brisbane Sydney Sydney Sydney Sydney Sydney Sydney Sydney Sydney Sydney Suva Suva Suva Suva Suva Suva Suva Suva Suva Papeete Papeete Papeete Papeete Papeete Papeete Papeete Papeete Papeete Noumea Noumea Noumea Noumea Noumea Noumea Noumea Noumea Noumea

Total Freq/Yr

500 to 1,000 200 to 500 100 to 200 50 to 100 20 to 50 1 to 20 all others

Total Traffic by Frequency

• 10

10

• 40
• 30
• 20

20 120

• 50

130 160 140 150 170 180

• 120
• 160
• 130
• 170
• 150
• 140
• 110

LL1999 by HHOO

100,000 50,000 10,000

Longline Fishing Effort 1999

• 10

10

• 40
• 30
• 20

20 120

• 50

130 160 140 150 170 180

• 120
• 160
• 130
• 170
• 150
• 140
• 110

PS1999 by DAY

400 200 100

Purse Seiner Fishing Effort 1999

Review of Ships Waste Management

• Carried out in 2002
• No PICs meet MARPOL requirements
• Smaller PICs can’t deal with ships waste
• Reg. arrangements – international ships
• Improve domestic ships waste
• Inter-island and fishing vessels concern
• Number of vessels flagged with countries not

party to MARPOL

• Fishing vessels non-convention vessels
• Reg. Arrangements approved by SPREP and

IMO in 2003

What we looked at

• MARPOL Requirements – Annex 1-5
• Categorized Classes of vessels

– Merchant (Container / tanker) – Passenger (international / domestic / charter) – Fishing (oceanic / coastal) – Military vessels – Yachts & Pleasure Craft

• Surveyed Countries and Ports
• Waste Generation Rates
• Capability of countries
• Recommendations

Regional Arrangements

• Recognized the limitation of many PICs

to effectively manage waste

• Unethical requirement to receive

international ships waste

• All responsible for domestic ship waste
• 6 regional centers for international

waste – Apra, Suva & Lautoka, Noumea, Papeete and Port Moresby

• Vessels encouraged to discharge waste
• utside region

Fishing Vessel Issues

• MARPOL is a shipping convention!
• 2002 – 959 fishing vessels, 116 m-ships
• Many fishing vessels - non-convention
• Relies Flag States to enforce
• What they are non-MARPOL?
• Sometimes no Port State Powers
• Waste from fleets that don’t come in to

ports? Do they store till home port?

• More responsibility needs to be taken by

states with distant water fleets.

Actions being Taken

• Regional Model Marine Pollution Act
• Regional Fisheries Observer Program
• Regional Oceans Policy
• Improvements to waste management
• Awareness – publications, activities
• Education – maritime training, schools
• Assoc. Pac. Ports - Environment Accord
• Fisheries Licenses

Main Lesson Learnt

• Ships waste/marine debris should be

looked at within the overall continuum

• f waste.
• Management needs to take an integrated

“cradle to grave approach” whose boundaries may extend beyond one state.

• Otherwise we continue to solve one

problem and cause another.

Sefa Nawadra Marine Pollution Adviser – SPRE P

<sefanaian@sprep.org.ws>