Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Adaptive Design of a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

adaptive design of a unidirectional adaptive design of a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Adaptive Design of a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ISMA23 - International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Sept. 16-18, 1998, Leuven, Belgium Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Source in a Duct Source in a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 1

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Source in a Duct Source in a Duct

Vesa Välimäki1 and Seppo Uosukainen2

1Helsinki University of Technology

Laboratory of Acoustics and Audio Signal Processing (Espoo, Finland)

2VTT Building Technology, Acoustics

(Espoo, Finland)

ISMA23 - International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering

  • Sept. 16-18, 1998, Leuven, Belgium
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 2

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Outline

➤ Introduction ➤ Principal unidirectional two-element constructions ➤ Adaptive design of a unidirectional two-element source ➤ Simulation examples ➤ Conclusions and future work

Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Adaptive Design of a Unidirectional Source in a Duct Source in a Duct

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 3

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

A unidirectional acoustic source in a narrow duct

➤ multiple actuators (see Refs. [1-7] of the paper) ➤ the input of each actuator must be processed (filtered)

Motivation

➤ to be used in feedforward broadband ANC systems ➤ anti-noise must to radiate downstream but not upstream

In this paper, we present structures and an adaptive design method for unidirectional two-element sources

Introduction Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 4

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

➤ the acoustic feedback is eliminated ➤ feedback neutralization filter is not needed ➤ SPL does not increase in the upstream direction due to the

secondary source

➤ the sound pressure level may be attenuated in the

upstream direction, since further reflections from duct terminations are eliminated

Advantages of unidirectional sources Advantages of unidirectional sources

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 5

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

➤ limited frequency band of about 2 to 4 octaves:

not unidirectional at low frequencies (close to 0 Hz) and above an upper frequency limit

➤ need for several actuators ➤ in practice, both disadvantages are tolerable ➤ also other ANC systems also suffer from these defects

Dis Disadvantages of unidirectional sources advantages of unidirectional sources

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 6

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

➤ deviations in the actuator responses degrade the obtainable

attenuation of unidirectional ANC systems – mutual difference

➤ also, measurement error in the distance between the

actuator elements causes degradation

➤ to automatically overcome both problems, we propose an

adaptive design method that learns how to equalize the loudspeakers and account for the propagation delay between them

➤ related earlier work: Elliott, 1993

Why adaptive design? Why adaptive design?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 7

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

➤ 4 different unidirectional two-element structures have been

proposed:

– two-element Swinbanks source (Swinbanks, 1973) – three versions of the JMC-based two-element source

(Uosukainen & Välimäki, 1998)

➤ these will be reviewed in the following

Principal unidirectional Principal unidirectional 2-element constructions 2-element constructions

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 8

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Two-element Swinbanks source Two-element Swinbanks source

q1 q2 1/2 A c0/d ∫dt

τ

  • 1

τL -τ/2

qL

➤ ideal 2-element unidirectional source by Swinbanks: – delay the 1st actuator by delay between the sources, τ – feed the actuators in oppposite phases ➤ the amplification factor is A = kd / sin(kd)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 9

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

JMC-based solutions JMC-based solutions

➤ the JMC method (Jessel, Mangiante & Canévet) is suitable

for formulating the ANC problem with the general system theory

➤ three types of secondary sources are needed: monopoles,

dipoles, and quadripoles

➤ in the case of plane waves (such as in a narrow duct),

quadripoles vanish

➤ ideal JMC actuators in a duct consist of monopole and

dipole sources only

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 10

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

JMC-based two-element sources JMC-based two-element sources

➤ inter-channel delay can be optimized in 3 different ways

  • 1. downstream
  • 2. upstream
  • 3. no delay at all

➤ the control structures for the 3 cases are illustrated next

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 11

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

1/2

  • 1/2

b a c0 /d ∫dt q1 q2 Σ Σ + + + _

τ/2 τ τL - τ/2

qL

Inter-channel delay optimized Inter-channel delay optimized downstream downstream

➤ filters a and b are given in Table 1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 12

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Inter-channel delay optimized Inter-channel delay optimized upstream upstream

1/2

  • 1/2

b a c0 /d ∫dt q1 q2 Σ Σ + + + _

τ/2 τ τL - τ/2

qL

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 13

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

No Inter-channel delay No Inter-channel delay

1/2

  • 1/2

b a c0 /d ∫dt q1 q2 Σ Σ + + + _

τL

qL ➤ in the non-adaptive case, the delayless version has been

found to be easiest to design (Uosukainen & Välimäki, 1998)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 14

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

S12(z)

Ventilation system Open end

H1(z) H2(z) S22(z) S21(z) S11(z)

Mic 1 Mic 1 Mic 2 Mic 2 Act 1 Act 1 Act 2 Act 2

M-LMS

– +

z-∆ NOISE ym1(n) ym2(n) y2(n) y1(n) e2(n)

  • e1(n)
  • Ref. signal
  • Ref. signal

Delay Delay

Adaptive design of a unidirectional Adaptive design of a unidirectional two-element source two-element source

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 15

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Different phases of the adaptive design Different phases of the adaptive design

➤ adaptive design contains 3 phases

  • 1. calibrate transfer functions Sij(z) from both actuators to

both microphones

  • 2. calibrate the unidirectionality (using the above system)
  • 3. calibrate the error path from the unidirectional source to

the error detector

➤ after these phases, the ANC operation may start using a

single-channel adaptive system (one more adaptive filter!)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 16

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Adaptive Swinbanks configuration Adaptive Swinbanks configuration

➤ the proposed adaptive structure can in principle design any

  • f the four unidirectional two-element structures

➤ here we show examples of designing the Swinbanks source ➤ the adaptive structures for the JMC-based structures are

shown in our paper

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 17

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Example 1 Example 1

➤ the delay between the two actuators has been chosen to be

T = 1/fs, that is, one sampling interval

5 10 15 20 −0.5 0.5 Sample index 5 10 15 20 −0.5 0.5 Sample index

➤ the impulse responses of

filters H1(z) and H2(z) are shown here (20 coefficients)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 18

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 −40 −20 Magnitude (dB) Normalized frequency 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 −8 −6 −4 −2 2 Magnitude (dB) Normalized frequency

➤ magnitude responses upstream (upper) and downstream

(lower) in Example 1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 19

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

➤ back-to-front ratio (La Fontaine & Shepherd, 1985)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 1 Back−to−front ratio Normalized frequency

➤ obtainable sound radiation downstream (w/ideal anti-noise)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 −40 −20 Magnitude (dB) Normalized frequency

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 20

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

➤ magnitude responses upstream (upper) and downstream

(lower) in Example 2 (delay between actuators = 2 samples)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 −40 −20 Magnitude (dB) Normalized frequency 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 −8 −6 −4 −2 2 Magnitude (dB) Normalized frequency

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Vesa Välimäki & Seppo Uosukainen 1998 21

HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

Conclusions and future work Conclusions and future work

➤ automatic design of a unidirectional two-element system

was described

➤ further work is needed to implement and evaluate the

adaptive design of JMC-based unidirectional structures

➤ a more advanced adaptive system could be designed that

adapts all transfer functions online: H1(z), H2(z), Sij(z), and the error path model

➤ finally, adaptive unidirectional systems should be tested in

actual real-time situations